Clinical Trials Logo

Coronary Stenosis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Coronary Stenosis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03465644 Active, not recruiting - Coronary Stenoses Clinical Trials

TAILored Versus COnventional AntithRombotic StratEgy IntenDed for Complex HIgh-Risk PCI

TAILORED-CHIP
Start date: February 12, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of tailored antithrombotic therapy with early (<6-month post-PCI) intensified (low-dose ticagrelor [120 mg loading, then 60 mg bid maintenance] and aspirin) and late (>6-month post-PCI) deescalated (clopidogrel alone) strategy in patients undergoing high-risk complex PCI as compared with standard Dual Antiplatelet Therapy(aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months).

NCT ID: NCT03185221 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Stenosis

Cordimax China Post Market Surveillance

Start date: June 20, 2013
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Study purpose: This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical research, which is to assess the effect of Cordimax and Xience V drug-eluting stents as they dealing with all kinds of complex lesions in the real world. Study group Experimental group: Cordimax® Rapamycin Eluting Coronary Stent System Control group: XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System

NCT ID: NCT02978456 Active, not recruiting - Coronary Disease Clinical Trials

Quantitative Coronary Angiography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound GUIDancE for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

GUIDE DES
Start date: February 23, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between quantitative coronary angiography -guided and Intravascular ultrasound -guided strategy in patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing sirolimus-eluting Orsiro/Orsiro mission stent implantation.

NCT ID: NCT02765646 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

eTryton Left Main Registry Tryton Side Branch Stent® Tmt of Denovo CAD in LM and CFX Arteries

eTRYTONLM
Start date: May 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the clinical performance of the Tryton Side Branch Stent used in conjunction with a commercially available Drug Eluting Stent (DES) to treat de novo bifurcated lesions involving both the Left Main (LM) and Circumflex Coronary Artery(LCX).

NCT ID: NCT02508714 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents

BIONYX
Start date: October 7, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.

NCT ID: NCT02175706 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

DUrable Polymer-based STent CHallenge of Promus ElemEnt Versus ReSolute Integrity

DUTCHPEERS
Start date: November 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other. Objective: To investigate whether the clinical outcome is similar after implantation of the Promus Element versus the Resolute Integrity stent (non-inferiority hypothesis). Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized single-blinded study. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. Intervention: In patients who are eligible for DES implantation, the type of DES implanted will be randomized (Resolute Integrity stent versus Promus Element stent). At the start of the study, both DES will also be used in routine clinical practice. Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of target vessel failure at one year follow-up. Target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite endpoint consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Further secondary clinical and angiographic endpoints will be investigated, defined in accordance with suggestions of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). Of note, the angiographic assessment is based on clinically indicated projections only and results in no additional x-ray exposure. There is no routine angiographic follow-up. If angiographic data are available in patients who undergo symptom-driven re-catheterization, we will analyze these data to get insight into the mechanisms of potential DES restenosis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will receive the routine clinical treatment. As a consequence, the risks of this trial do not exceed the risks of any routine PCI procedure.

NCT ID: NCT02128412 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Single de Novo Coronary Artery Stenoses

IVUS Controlled Stenting

Start date: February 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Stent placement is now widely accepted to improve the results of angioplasty (an operation to widen the blood vessel) and decreasing the need for further surgery. Despite their worldwide acceptance, stent usage is still limited by renarrowing which occurs within the stent (restenosis) in some patients within the first six months. In addition there still exists a small risk of heart attacks soon after the stent is placed. The purpose of this study is to test the safety and tolerability of trying to place the stents using a different strategy of using low pressure oversized balloon inflations as opposed to the usual high pressure balloon inflations. This may reduce injury to the artery and reduce the chance of renarrowing of the stent. In order to ensure this is a safe and effective way of performing the procedure the investigators intend to use an Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter to look from inside the artery at the stents. IVUS has proven to be the best way of ensuring optimal stent placement. Primary hypothesis: Stents will be equally well expanded and apposed using a strategy of oversized stenting at normal inflation pressures ( < 10 atmospheres ) as compared to high pressure inflation (≥14 atmospheres) as guided by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Secondary Hypothesis: There will be no difference in acute clinical endpoints (death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation or stent thrombosis) using a strategy of oversized stenting at normal inflation pressure as compared to high pressure inflation. Tertiary Hypothesis: If the above is shown to be true the investigators would hope to expand the study in order to reveal a decrease in stent restenosis using a strategy of lower pressure balloon inflations. The investigators will assess the deployment characteristics of drug eluting versus bare metal stents

NCT ID: NCT02100722 Active, not recruiting - Coronary Disease Clinical Trials

A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

FAME 3
Start date: August 25, 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Fractional flow reserve (FFR, (coronary pressure wire-based index for assessing the ischemic potential of a coronary lesion)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) will result in similar outcomes to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

NCT ID: NCT01960504 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

First in Man Study of the DREAMS 2nd Generation Drug Eluting Absorbable Metal Scaffold (BIOSOLVE-II)

BIOSOLVE-II
Start date: October 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

BIOSOLVE-II is a prospective, international, multicenter, First in Man study. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical performance of the drug eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS 2nd Generation).

NCT ID: NCT01794065 Active, not recruiting - Coronary Stenosis Clinical Trials

The Promus Element Rewards Study

Start date: October 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This study is being done to study stent deformation on persons with de novo coronary lesions to determine how much deformation takes place and how often. The information gathered from the group that receives the Promus element stent will be compared to other groups that receive other contemporary drug eluting stents.