Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03417388
Other study ID # IRB201701142 -A
Secondary ID W81XWH-17-2-0030
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date February 9, 2018
Est. completion date December 30, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source University of Florida
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The Ischemia-IMT (Ischemia-Intensive Medical Treatment Reduces Events in Women with Non-Obstructive CAD), subtitle: Women's Ischemia Trial to Reduce Events in Non-Obstructive CAD (WARRIOR) trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation (PROBE design) evaluating intensive statin/ACE-I (or ARB)/aspirin treatment (IMT) vs. usual care (UC) in 4,422 symptomatic women patients with symptoms and/or signs of ischemia but no obstructive CAD. The hypothesis is that IMT will reduce major adverse coronary events (MACE) 20% vs. UC. The primary outcome is first occurrence of MACE as death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) or hospitalization for heart failure or angina. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, time to "return to duty"/work, health resource consumption, angina, cardiovascular (CV) death and primary outcome components. Events will be adjudicated by an experienced Clinical Events Committee (CEC). Follow-up will be 3-years using 50 sites: primarily VA and Active Duty Military Hospitals/Clinics and a National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) clinical data research network (CDRN)(OneFlorida Consortium). This study is being conducted to determine whether intensive medication treatment to modify risk factors and vascular function in women patients with coronary arteries showing no flow limit obstruction but with cardiac symptoms (i.e., chest pain, shortness of breath) will reduce the patient's likelihood of dying, having a heart attack, stroke/TIA or being hospitalized for cardiac reasons. The results will provide evidence data necessary to inform future guidelines regarding how best to treat this growing population of patients, and ultimately improve the patient's cardiac health and quality of life and reduce health-care costs.


Description:

WARRIOR trial is a multi-site, PROBE design, that will evaluate an intensive statin/ACE-I (or ARB)/aspirin treatment strategy (IMT) vs. primary prevention risk factor therapy treatment strategy (UC) in 4,422 symptomatic (chronic angina or equivalent) women with non-obstructive CAD (<50% diameter narrowing). There will be ~80 US sites, including VA/ military and OneFlorida CDRN sites, with a proven record in prior trials. The investigators will use web-based, real-time data entry, and management University of Florida Data Management System (UFDMS) for site selection, screening, participant eligibility confirmation, enrollment, and randomization. Participants will be recruited from screened women with symptoms suspected to be ischemic with non-obstructive CAD by invasive coronary angiogram or CT angiogram. The high dose statin (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) and ACE-I (lisinopril) [or ARB (losartan)] are generic commonly used medications previously demonstrated effective for improving angina, stress testing, myocardial perfusion and coronary microvascular flow reserve in small size trials in this population. Additionally, aspirin will also be recommended to IMT participants without contraindications or excess bleeding risk, however aspirin will not be provided by the study. Both the groups will also receive Lifestyle Counseling (PACE Assessment), and the same visit schedule and "face-time" with site staff to reduce bias. Events will be adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC), according to objective criteria and masked to treatment assignment clues.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 2476
Est. completion date December 30, 2024
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 100 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Signs and symptoms of suspected ischemia prompting referral for further evaluation by cardiac catheterization or coronary angiogram or coronary CT angiogram within 5 years from consent - Willing to provide written informed consent - Non-obstructive CAD defined as 0 to 49% diameter reduction of a major epicardial vessel or a FFR>0.80 Exclusion Criteria: - History of noncompliance (with medical therapy, protocol, or follow-up) - History of non-ischemic dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy - Documented acute coronary syndrome(ACS) within previous 30 days - Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, New York Heart Association heart failure (NYHA HF) class III-IV, or hospitalization for Reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) within 180 days - Stroke within previous 180 days or intracranial hemorrhage at any time - End-stage renal disease, on dialysis, or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min. - Severe valvular disease or likely to require surgery/Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TVAR) within 3 years - Life expectancy <3-yrs. due to non-cardiovascular comorbidity - Enrolled in a competing clinical trial - Prior intolerance to both an ACE-I and ARB - If intolerant to a statin unless taking a PCSK9 as a statin replacement by their clinical provider - Pregnancy (all pre-menopausal females must have negative urine pregnancy test if randomized to IMT before study drugs are prescribed. If they have not gone through menopause, had a hysterectomy, oophorectomy, or sterilization such as tubal ligation procedure)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
High dose potent statin
The IMT-assigned women will receive high-dose, potent statin (atorvastatin 40-80 mg/d or rosuvastatin 20-40mg) class of lipid-lowering medications.
ACE-I (lisinopril) or ARB (losartan)
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for primary hypertension.
Aspirin
Will be recommended to IMT women without contraindications or bleeding risk.
Behavioral:
Lifestyle Counseling
The PACE Lifestyle Assessment Intervention which is a program to assist with smoking cessation, weight loss, and exercise.
Quality of Life Questionnaires
Quality of Life Questionnaires will be obtained.

Locations

Country Name City State
Puerto Rico VA Caribbean Healthcare System San Juan
United States Peak Clinical Trials, LLC Apex North Carolina
United States Emory University Atlanta Georgia
United States Austin Heart Austin Texas
United States Seton Heart Institute Austin Texas
United States Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda Maryland
United States Western Kentucky Heart And Lung Bowling Green Kentucky
United States University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia
United States Loyola University Chicago Chicago Illinois
United States The Christ Hospital Cincinnati Ohio
United States Trihealth Heart Institute Cincinnati Ohio
United States Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants Clinical Research Clearwater Florida
United States Bassett Healthcare Network Cooperstown New York
United States South Palm Cardiovascular Research Institute Delray Beach Florida
United States Essentia Institute of Rural Health Duluth Minnesota
United States Midwest Cardiovascular Research and Education Foundation Elkhart Indiana
United States Medicoricium Fairview Heights Illinois
United States Brooke Army Medical Center Fort Sam Houston Texas
United States Lutheran Health Physicians Fort Wayne Indiana
United States Cardiovascular Clinic at UF Health UF Gainesville Florida
United States Family Medicine at 4th Ave Gainesville Florida
United States Family Medicine at Eastside Community Practice Gainesville Florida
United States Family Medicine at Haile Plantation (Adults & Peds) Gainesville Florida
United States Family Medicine at Hampton Oaks Medical Plaza (Adults and Peds) Gainesville Florida
United States Family Medicine at Old Town (Adults and Peds) Gainesville Florida
United States Internal Medicine at Tower Hill Gainesville Florida
United States Internal Medicine at UF Health Medical Plaza Gainesville Florida
United States Malcom Randall VA Medical Center Gainesville Florida
United States Spring Hill Cardiology Gainesville Florida
United States Dignity Health-Mercy Gilbert Medical Center Gilbert Arizona
United States Silver State Cardiology Henderson Nevada
United States Baptist Health Jacksonville Florida
United States Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida
United States Naval Hospital Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida
United States University of Florida, Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida
United States UF Primary Care at Lake City SW Lake City Florida
United States UF Primary Care at Lake City West Lake City Florida
United States The Research Group of Lexington, LLC Lexington Kentucky
United States University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky
United States University of Arkansas Little Rock Arkansas
United States Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute Los Angeles California
United States UCLA Medical Center Los Angeles California
United States Charles H. Croft MDPA Melbourne Florida
United States Mid Michigan Health Midland Michigan
United States Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation Minneapolis Minnesota
United States Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc. Mobile Alabama
United States West Virginia University Morgantown West Virginia
United States Daytona Heart Group Multiple Locations Florida
United States Southwest Florida Research Institute Naples Florida
United States NYU Langone New York New York
United States Weil Medical college of Cornell New York New York
United States Cardiovascular Instititute of Central Florida Ocala Florida
United States Ocala Research Institute Inc. Ocala Florida
United States CHI Health Research Center Omaha Nebraska
United States Orlando Health Orlando Florida
United States Midwest Heart and Vascular Specialists Overland Park Kansas
United States Naval Hospital Pensacola Pensacola Florida
United States Dignity Health-St. Joseph Phoenix Arizona
United States Pinehurst Medical Clinic Pinehurst North Carolina
United States Berkshire Medical Center Pittsfield Massachusetts
United States Chippenham Hospital Richmond Virginia
United States Jamaica Hospital Medical Center Richmond Hill New York
United States The Valley Hospital Ridgewood New Jersey
United States Carilion Clinic Roanoke Virginia
United States San Antonio Endovascular and Heart Institute San Antonio Texas
United States Cardiovascular Center of Sarasota Sarasota Florida
United States Advent Sebring Sebring Florida
United States Heart House Research Foundation Springfield Ohio
United States AdventHealth Tampa - Pepin Heart Institute Tampa Florida
United States BayCare Medical Group Tampa Florida
United States Interventional Cardiac Consultants Tampa Florida
United States James A. Haley Veterans Hospital Tampa Florida
United States Baylor Scott and White Temple Texas
United States Cardiovascular Consultants of South Georgia, LLC. Thomasville Georgia
United States Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor UCLA Medical Center Torrance California
United States University of Arizona Tucson Arizona
United States Cardiology Associates Research, LLC Tupelo Mississippi
United States Cardiology Associates Research. LLC Tupelo Mississippi
United States Carle Foundation Hospital Urbana Illinois
United States Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia
United States Guardian Research Winter Park Florida

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Florida United States Department of Defense

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Puerto Rico, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary All Cause Death incidents reported between the two groups Collection of all deaths reported between the two groups will use the log rank test for comparison of outcomes. Although the power analysis required the exponential assumption, the actual statistical test is free of assumptions, as the null hypothesis is that the survival distributions for the two strategies are the same, and therefore the null hazard ratio is 1.00 (proportional hazards). 3 years
Primary Non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) incidents reported between the two groups Collection of all non-fatal MI's reported between the two groups will use the log rank test for comparison of outcomes. Although the power analysis required the exponential assumption, the actual statistical test is free of assumptions, as the null hypothesis is that the survival distributions for the two strategies are the same, and therefore the null hazard ratio is 1.00 (proportional hazards). MI definition follows universal criteria for Types 1-5 MI events. Specifically, the use of the "Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction" detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarker values, with at least one value >99th percentile upper reference limit and preferred biomarker is Cardiac troponin (cTn). 3 years
Primary Stroke/TIA incidents reported between the two groups Collection of all strokes or transient ischemic attack (TIA) reported between the two groups will use the log rank test for comparison of outcomes. Although the power analysis required the exponential assumption, the actual statistical test is free of assumptions, as the null hypothesis is that the survival distributions for the two strategies are the same, and therefore the null hazard ratio is 1.00 (proportional hazards). The stroke definition is new onset neurological defect of central origin confirmed by brain imaging (CT or MRI) evidence of cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage. The definition of TIA is the same as stroke except no confirmation by brain imaging, but confirmed by a neurologist consult. 3 years
Primary Hospitalizations for cardiovascular events reported between the two groups Collection of all hospitalization for cardiovascular events reported between the two groups will use the log rank test for comparison of outcomes. Although the power analysis required the exponential assumption, the actual statistical test is free of assumptions, as the null hypothesis is that the survival distributions for the two strategies are the same, and therefore the null hazard ratio is 1.00 (proportional hazards). Cardiovascular causes includes accelerated angina, persistent angina, unstable angina. 3 years
Primary Hospitalizations for heart failure incidents reported between the two groups Collection of all hospitalizations for heart failure between the two groups will use the log rank test for comparison of outcomes. Although the power analysis required the exponential assumption, the actual statistical test is free of assumptions, as the null hypothesis is that the survival distributions for the two strategies are the same, and therefore the null hazard ratio is 1.00 (proportional hazards). 3 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A