Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT01065519 |
| Other study ID # |
EudraCT 2009-010923-14 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
June 2009 |
| Est. completion date |
January 14, 2016 |
Study information
| Verified date |
April 2009 |
| Source |
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Assessment of vessel healing after DES implantation in STEMI, NSTEMI and stable/unstable
angina patients: a randomized comparison between everolimus and biolimus A9-eluting stents:
an optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound-tissue characterisation
(IVUS-TC) study.
Plaque characterisation substudy: Assessment of culprit lesions in different subsets of
patients (STEMI, NSTEMI and stable/unstable angina) by use of optical coherence tomography
(OCT) and intravascular ultrasound tissue characterisation (IVUS-TC).
Description:
1. The use of DES in STEMI and NSTEMI is still a matter of intense debate. Reassuring data
of trials, meta-analyses and registries conflict with reports of delayed arterial
healing and higher risk of stent thrombosis after DES implantation in ACS patients.
Heterogeneity in healing (bad healing at the site of the necrotic core), stent strut
malapposition and plaque prolapse are all proposed as possible causes for a higher risk
of stent thrombosis. Furthermore, next generation DES claims a better safety profile in
comparison to first-generation DES.
2. Thus far, our information on tissue characterisation of coronary plaques prone to
rupture, relies on histopathology data. Recently, new invasive coronary imaging
techniques; radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound (RF-IVUS) and optical coherence
tomography (OCT) provide new possibilities for in vivo assessment of coronary plaques.
Aims:
1. To evaluate vessel healing, expressed as stent strut coverage and stent strut apposition
assessed with OCT at 9 months after PCI and compare between everolimus Xience V (Abbott
Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) and biolimus A9-eluting Biomatrix (Biosensors, Newport Beach,
CA) stents, in 3 different groups of patient subsets (STEMI, NSTEMI and patients with
stable/unstable angina).
2. To make, by use of OCT and IVUS-TC, a detailed characterisation of coronary lesions
before PCI and to study the possible link between specific lesion characteristics (e.g.
thin cap fibroatheroma, large necrotic core, extensive calcification,…) and outcome
(risk of distal embolisation and myonecrosis in the short term, risk of bad strut
coverage or risk of restenosis or stent thrombosis on longer term). To compare the
performance of both technologies (OCT and IVUS-TC) in a direct way.
3. To assess, by use of OCT and IVUS-TC, the stented segment just after the intervention
(assessment of stent expansion, stent strut apposition, detection of edge dissection,
intraluminal thrombus) and correlate with angiographic and clinical outcomes. Again, the
performance of both technologies will be compared in a direct way.
4. To study the influence of drug-eluting stent implantation in a 3-5 cm long segment of
the coronary artery just distal to the implanted stent by use of OCT at baseline and at
9 months after stent implantation.
Methods: Patients undergoing PCI are recruited from 3 groups of patients: patients with STEMI
(group I), patients with NSTEMI (group II) and patients with stable/unstable angina (group
III). From each group, 20 patients are included. In each individual group, randomization
between an everolimus-eluting stent and a biolimus A9-eluting stent is performed. All
patients undergo IVUS-TC and OCT examination of the stented segment (and the 3 to 5 cm distal
from the stented segment) just before and after stent implantation at the time of the index
procedure. All patients undergo control angiography with OCT examination at 9 months
follow-up.