View clinical trials related to Corneal Edema.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to compare different doses of AURN001 in patients with corneal edema secondary to corneal endothelial dysfunction. The main questions the clinical trial aims to answer are whether AURN001 effective and safe. Participants will receive a single injection of AURN001. A comparison between low, medium, and high doses of AURN001 against the contribution of each element, cells alone and Y27632 alone, will be conducted to determine the effects on corneal edema.
The goal of this clinical study is to assess the safety of multiple intracameral injections of EO2002 with and without topical Ripasudil.
Assessing eFficacy and Safety of DEXTENZA 0.4 mg inseRt, Following Cataract Surgery
This study is designed as a randomised multicentric parallel group pragmatic trial of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in corneal endothelial decompensation. the purpose is to compare the clinical and patient reported outcomes of both therapies across a broad range of indications.
Corneal edema is the most common indication for corneal transplantation, accounting for approximately 70% of penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and 100% of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedures annually. There is currently no disease-modifying treatment for corneal edema. Topical treatments like hypertonic saline are not effective on a long-term basis. For those with advanced disease, where edema and vision loss are not controlled by topical treatment, the only option is a corneal transplant. A potential approach to avoidance of the risks of corneal transplantation is to inject cultured human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) into the anterior chamber of the eye. This approach may avoid surgery by re-populating the inner most aspect of the cornea with functioning endothelial cells. Emmecell has developed a treatment based on technology integrating biocompatible magnetic nanoparticles with cultured HCECs to treat corneal edema in a minimally invasive way. The primary objective of this phase 1, prospective, multi-center, open-label, dose-escalation study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 3 doses of EO2002 with and without endothelial brushing (EB) or Descemet Stripping (DS) in eyes with corneal edema secondary to corneal endothelial dysfunction that qualify for surgery involving full-thickness corneal transplantation or EK.
Surgical treatment of corneal endothelial decompensation in the presence of an anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC IOL) is technically challenging. The ultimate management is to perform Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). However , unfolding the DMEK graft in the presence of an AC IOL can be difficult and injurious to the graft so the investigators recommend exchanging the AC IOL with a posterior chamber IOL first. In this study , the investigators aim to compare the outcome and complications of performing DMEK and IOL exchange as combined one stage surgery versus .sequential 2 stage procedure
Single center, phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of EO1404 in subjects with corneal edema secondary to pseudophakic bullous keratopathy or Fuch's endothelial dystrophy.