Cornea Donor Study

Corneal Disease Clinical Trial

— CDS  

Official title:

Cornea Donor Study: The Effect of Donor Age on Penetrating Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disease

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00006411
• Other study ID #: NEI-80
• Secondary ID: 5U10EY0123583U10
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 10, 2000
• Est. completion date: July 2014

Study information

• Verified date: August 2018
• Source: National Eye Institute (NEI)
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The Cornea Donor Study (CDS) was designed as a prospective cohort study with the following objectives:

To determine whether the graft-failure rate over a 5-year follow-up period following corneal transplantation is the same when using corneal tissue from donors older than 65 years of age compared with tissue from younger donors.

To assess the relationship between donor/recipient ABO blood type compatibility and graft failure due to rejection.

To assess corneal endothelial cell density as an indicator of the health of the cornea and as a alternate outcome measure (in an optional Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study).

Description:

The study enrolled 1101 subjects with a corneal disease considered to be at moderate risk for failure (principally Fuchs' dystrophy and pseudophakic corneal edema). A donor cornea meeting the following criteria was assigned to the subject by one of 43 participating eye banks:

• donor age 10 to 75 years

• endothelial cell count 2300 to 3300

• tissue quality very good to excellent

• death to preservation time <12 hrs if body refrigerated or eyes on ice and <8 hrs if not

• death to surgery time <5 days

The cornea surgeon (investigator) and patient were masked to donor age and characteristics of the donor cornea. Preoperative management, surgical technique, and postoperative care, including prescription of medications, were provided according to each investigator's customary routine. The follow-up visit schedule for the initial six months was left to each investigator's discretion and after this time the minimum follow-up visit schedule included a visit between six and 12 months and then one visit every 12 months through five years. The primary study outcome was graft survival at five years. The definition of graft failure, based on the definition used in Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies, was a regraft or, in the absence of regraft, a cloudy cornea in which there was loss of central graft clarity sufficient to compromise vision for a minimum of three consecutive months. Follow-up in the initial phase of the study continued for five years unless the patient had a regraft of the study eye.

For the ABO compatibility study, the ABO blood type of both the donor and recipient were determined in order to compare the rate of graft failure for ABO-compatible cases with the rate for ABO-incompatible cases.

For the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study, endothelial cell counts were determined from specular images by a central reading center, and the relationship of the cell counts to donor age were assessed. In the initial phase of the study, specular images were obtained at 6 months, and then annually through five years post-transplant.

Five-year follow up was completed in November 2007. The 5-year cumulative probability of success was 86%: 86% in the <66.0 year donor age group and 86% in the >=66.0 year donor age group (difference = 0%, upper limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval = 4%). Adjusting for baseline endothelial cell density had no appreciable effect on these results. In a statistical model with donor age as a continuous variable, there was not a significant relationship between donor age and outcome (P=0.11). Three graft failures were due to primary donor failure, 8 to uncorrectable refractive error, 48 to graft rejection, 46 to endothelial decompensation, and 30 to other causes. At least one probable or definite graft rejection episode preceded graft failure in 23 of the 46 failures attributed to endothelial decompensation (4 definite and 19 probable) and in 18 of the 30 failures attributed to other causes (4 definite and 14 probable). The distribution of causes of failure between the donor age groups did not substantially differ.

Although the 5-year results indicated no difference in the success rate of moderate-risk transplants according to donor age, results from the SMAS indicated that among the successful cases, there was a slight association between donor age and endothelial cell loss, with the cell loss after 5 years being slightly lower in corneas from younger donors (r adjusted for baseline endothelial cell density = -0.19, 95% confidence interval -0.29 to -0.08). Whether this slight association between cell loss and donor age is of clinical importance is not known. Of perhaps even greater importance, however, was the finding that irrespective of donor age, endothelial cell loss was substantial over the first five years after transplant even when the graft had been successful. Half of the successful cases experienced a cell loss of 70% or more, and at five years more than half had an endothelial cell density <800 cells/mm2.

Patients in the CDS continued in annual follow up through 2012 in order to to determine the overall 10-year survival rate for moderate risk grafts and to determine whether the graft-failure rate is related to donor age. Additional objectives included determining the value of endothelial cell density in predicting graft failure and evaluating donor and recipient characteristics that may be predictive of late graft failure. All CDS subjects who were active at the 5-year exam were eligible for the extended follow-up phase.

As part of the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study, follow-up images were obtained during the extended follow-up phase at 7-8 years and again at 10-years. The same procedures used during the first 5 years were followed for the grading of the 7-8 year and 10-year images.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 1090
• Est. completion date: July 2014
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2012
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 40 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion

1. Age range 40-80 years

2. Corneal disease: Presence of a condition associated with endothelial dysfunction, including pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema, Fuchs' dystrophy, posterior polymorphous dystrophy, interstitial keratitis (nonherpetic) or perforating corneal injury

3. Willingness to be followed for 5 years and life expectancy at least 5 years (in investigator's judgement)

Exclusion

1. Patients are to be excluded when there is:

• a high risk of graft failure, including failed prior penetrating keratoplasty in the eye to be transplanted, chemical burns or other significant cicatricial conjunctivitis (ocular surface disease), herpes simplex/zoster, temporary keratoprosthesis, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome or any corneal condition in which there are two or more quadrants of stromal neovascularization

• A quadrant is considered vascularized if there is at least one patent stromal vessel >2.0 mm in length crossing the limbus within a quadrant. Two quadrants are considered vascularized if there are at least two stromal vessels 90º or more apart. Enrollment will be restricted to no more than 20% of the total cohort having stromal neovascularization.

• Patients should be excluded if there are PAS or other abnormalities that, in the view of the investigator, place the patient at high risk for graft failure.

• a very high probability of success including keratoconus, stromal dystrophies, stromal scars without edema or post-refractive surgery with healthy endothelium

2. Uncontrolled glaucoma or prior filtering surgery with placement of a shunt in the eye to be grafted (Note: eyes requiring a filtering procedure combined with the PK are considered to have uncontrolled glaucoma and are ineligible. Eyes which have undergone filtering surgery (without a shunt) in which glaucoma is currently considered under control are eligible)

3. Uncontrolled uveitis in the eye to be grafted

4. Fellow eye visual acuity <20/200

5. Fellow eye already included in the study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Corneal Disease
• Corneal Diseases
• Corneal Edema
• Fuch's Dystrophy
• Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy
• Pseudophakic Corneal Edema

Intervention

Other:
• corneas assigned by donor age group
A web-based computer program was used to select and assign a cornea by donor age group from those available at the eye bank that met the study eligibility criteria. The program randomly selected a cornea based on a two-level minimization procedure which attempted first to balance for each surgeon the number of corneas from donors >=66 and <66 years old and then, when possible, to balance among age subgroups of 10-35, 36-50, 51-65, 66-70, and 71-75 years. The assignment was made without regard to recipient age or any other subject characteristics.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Jaeb Center for Health Research, Inc.	Tampa	Florida

Sponsors (15)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
National Eye Institute (NEI)	Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Eye Bank Association of America, Eye Bank for Sight Restoration, Katena Products, Inc., Konan Medical, Inc., Lions Eye Bank of Oregon, Midwest Eye Banks, San Diego Eye Bank, Sight Society of Northeastern New York (Lions Eye Bank of Albany), SightLife, The Cornea Society, Tissue Banks International, ViroMed Laboratories, Inc., Vision Share, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (23)

Beck RW, Gal RL, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Cavanagh HD, Foulks GN, Heck EL, Lindquist T, Macsai MS, Smith RE, Stark WJ, Stulting RD, Sugar J. Is donor age an important determinant of graft survival? Cornea. 1999 Sep;18(5):503-10. Review. — View Citation

Benetz BA, Gal RL, Ruedy KJ, Rice C, Beck RW, Kalajian AD, Lass JH; Cornea Donor Study Group. Specular microscopy ancillary study methods for donor endothelial cell density determination of Cornea Donor Study images. Curr Eye Res. 2006 Apr;31(4):319-27. — View Citation

Benetz BA, Lass JH, Gal RL, Sugar A, Menegay H, Dontchev M, Kollman C, Beck RW, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Gorovoy M, Hannush SB, Bokosky JE, Caudill JW; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Endothelial morphometric measures to predict endothelial graft fai — View Citation

Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group, gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Kollman C, Dunn SP, Heck EL, Lass JH, Montoya MM, Schultze RL, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Sugar J, Tennant B, Verdier DD. The effect of donor age on corneal transplantat — View Citation

Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group, Lass JH, Gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW, Kollman C, Dunn SP, Heck E, Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Montoya MM, Schultze RL, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Sugar J, Tennant B, Verdier DD. Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 ye — View Citation

Dunn SP, Gal RL, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dontchev M, Blanton CL, Holland EJ, Lass JH, Kenyon KR, Mannis MJ, Mian SI, Rapuano CJ, Stark WJ, Beck RW; Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group. Corneal graft rejection 10 years after penetra — View Citation

Dunn SP, Stark WJ, Stulting RD, Lass JH, Sugar A, Pavilack MA, Smith PW, Tanner JP, Dontchev M, Gal RL, Beck RW, Kollman C, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. The effect of ABO blood incompatibility on corneal transplant failure — View Citation

Lass JH, Beck RW, Benetz BA, Dontchev M, Gal RL, Holland EJ, Kollman C, Mannis MJ, Price F Jr, Raber I, Stark W, Stulting RD, Sugar A; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Baseline factors related to endothelial cell loss following penetrating keratopla — View Citation

Lass JH, Gal RL, Ruedy KJ, Benetz BA, Beck RW, Baratz KH, Holland EJ, Kalajian A, Kollman C, Manning FJ, Mannis MJ, McCoy K, Montoya M, Stulting D, Xing D; Cornea Donor Study Group. An evaluation of image quality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of do — View Citation

Lass JH, Riddlesworth TD, Gal RL, Kollman C, Benetz BA, Price FW Jr, Sugar A, Terry MA, Soper M, Beck RW; Cornea Donor Study Research Group. The effect of donor diabetes history on graft failure and endothelial cell density 10 years after penetrating kera — View Citation

Lass JH, Sugar A, Benetz BA, Beck RW, Dontchev M, Gal RL, Kollman C, Gross R, Heck E, Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Raber I, Stark W, Stulting RD; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Endothelial cell density to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrat — View Citation

Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Beck RW, Belin MW, Goldberg MA, Gal RL, Kalajian AD, Kenyon KR, Kollman C, Ruedy KJ, Smith P, Sugar J, Stark WJ; Cornea Donor Study Group. Clinical profile and early surgical complications in the Cornea Donor Study. Cornea. 2006 Feb — View Citation

Powe A, Gal RL, Beck RW, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ on behalf of the Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. The Cornea Donor Study. Vision Pan-America 2009; 8:134-137.

Riddlesworth TD, Kollman C, Lass JH, Patel SV, Stulting RD, Benetz BA, Gal RL, Beck RW. A mathematical model to predict endothelial cell density following penetrating keratoplasty with selective dropout from graft failure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 — View Citation

Stulting RD, Sugar A, Beck R, Belin M, Dontchev M, Feder RS, Gal RL, Holland EJ, Kollman C, Mannis MJ, Price F Jr, Stark W, Verdier DD; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Effect of donor and recipient factors on corneal graft rejection. Cornea. 2012 O — View Citation

Sugar A, Gal RL, Beck rW, Ruedy KJ, Blanton CL, Feder RS, Hardten DR, Holland EJ, Lass JH, Mannis MJ, O'Keefe MB; Cornea Donor Study Group. Baseline donor characteristics in the Cornea Donor Study. Cornea. 2005 May;24(4):389-96. — View Citation

Sugar A, Montoya MM, Beck R, Cowden JW, Dontchev M, Gal RL, Kollman C, Malling J, Mannis MJ, Tennant B; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Impact of the cornea donor study on acceptance of corneas from older donors. Cornea. 2012 Dec;31(12):1441-5. doi — View Citation

Sugar A, Tanner JP, Dontchev M, Tennant B, Schultze RL, Dunn SP, Lindquist TD, Gal RL, Beck RW, Kollman C, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology. 200 — View Citation

Sugar J, Montoya M, Dontchev M, Tanner JP, Beck R, Gal R, Gallagher S, Gaster R, Heck E, Holland EJ, Kollman C, Malling J, Mannis MJ, Woody J; Group Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Donor risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Cor — View Citation

Verdier DD, Sugar A, Baratz K, Beck R, Dontchev M, Dunn S, Gal RL, Holland EJ, Kollman C, Lass JH, Mannis MJ, Penta J; Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Corneal thickness as a predictor of corneal transplant outcome. Cornea. 2013 Jun;32(6):729-36. do — View Citation

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group, Lass JH, Benetz BA, Gal RL, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dontchev M, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Chow C, McCoy K, Price FW Jr, Sugar A, Verdier DD, Beck RW. Donor age and factors related to endothelial ce — View Citation

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Gal RL, Dontchev M, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dunn SP, Schultze RL, Verdier DD, Lass JH, Raber IM, Sugar J, Gorovoy MS, Sugar A, Stulting RD, Montoya MM, Penta JG, Benetz BA — View Citation

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group, Sugar A, Gal RL, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dontchev M, Croasdale CR, Feder RS, Holland EJ, Lass JH, Macy JI, Mannis MJ, Smith PW, Soukiasian SH, Beck RW. Factors associated with corneal graft surv — View Citation

* Note: There are 23 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Graft Failure	# eyes with graft failure, defined as a regraft or a cloudy cornea that was sufficiently opaque as to compromise vision for a minimum of three consecutive months. Only one eye per participant was included in the study.	Baseline to 10 Years of Follow Up
Secondary	Endothelial Cell Density (ECD)	ECD (cells/mm2)was measured on a subset of the overall Cornea Donor Study cohort who participated in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study	10 year ECD