View clinical trials related to Contrast-induced Nephropathy.
Filter by:This prospective study is intended to evaluate if carvedilol has any potential protective effect over atorvastatin on the development of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) following cardiac catheterization in patients with moderate to high risk for CIN.
The use of coronary intervention has increased over the last decade. Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) that develops as a result of procedures using intravenous or intra arterial contrast enhancement, or other diagnostic procedures, has been reported to be the third leading cause of acute renal failure in hospitalized patients. It has been hypothesized that this occurs as a result of direct toxicity, oxidative stress, and ischemic injury. Numerous studies have evaluated the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing angiography. There are limited studies in the acute care setting. Therefore, a tool that could identify early risk factors for CIN would be valuable for patient care. Metabolomic profiling is the identification of small molecule metabolites that are altered in response to injury. We hypothetize that urine metabolomic profiles may differ in patients before and after contrast administration coronary intervention.We hypothesized that metabolomic profiles will differ between those patients who develop CIN and those who do not after contrast administration. In addition we believe that metabolomics profiles prior to angiography may identify subjects who will go on to develop CIN and are therefore at higher risk.
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), an acute kidney injury resulting from the administration of intravascular iodinated contrast media, is an important cause of morbidity/mortality following coronary angiographic procedures in high-risk patients. Despite preventative measures intended to mitigate the risk of CIN, there remains a need for an effective intervention. Dietary inorganic nitrate therapy, which through its chemical reduction in the body delivers nitric oxide has shown promise in attenuating CIN, but its effectiveness in preserving long-term renal function is unknown.
To evaluate the benefit for statin use in prevention of of CI-AKI after computed tomography urogram (CTU).
Severe aortic stenosis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality of the elderly affecting approximately 3% of elderly patients with an increasing number of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve interventions. As part of pre-procedural planning these patients undergo CT scans and receive contrast during the procedure. These patients often have baseline renal insufficiency and are high risk of contrast induced nephropathy despite pre-hydration techniques. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of this simple and safe procedure in preventing renal injury in this particular population.
an interventional study to measure the possible effects of spironolactone ( an aldosterone antagonist) on the incidence of acute kidney injury after coronary angiography
Contrast agent is typically used during routine cardiac intervention in order to enhance the imaging necessary to perform the procedure. Using this contrast agent could lead to kidney injury, called contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). Currently, the methods used to reduce the risk of CIN include reducing the amount of contrast agent used and using a hydration strategy during procedure. A computer-based risk tool has been developed which reports a risk score for the likelihood a person undergoing cardiac intervention gets CIN and a proposed corresponding hydration strategy to reduce the risk of CIN. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the rate of CIN decreases when the treating physician has access to this risk tool during the procedure.
After administration of intravascular iodinated contrast media Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN), also known as Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury (CIAKI), may occur. CIN/CI-AKI is associated with increased risk of dialysis and mortality. No treatment exists for CIN/CI-AKI, therefore the focus lies on prevention. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention of CIN/CI-AKI exist and are implemented in most hospitals. Generally, intravascular volume expansion with normal saline is recommended as prophylaxis. Earlier this year the results of the AMACING study (A MAastricht Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Guideline study) were published in The Lancet (NL47173.068.14/METC 14-2-006; Clinical Trials.gov NCT02106234; http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)30057-0/fulltext). These results show that for the greater part (>90%) of patients considered to be at risk of CIN/CI-AKI by the guidelines, withholding prophylaxis is non-inferior to giving standard intravenous prophylactic hydration in the prevention of CIN/CI-AKI. Furthermore, the standard prophylactic hydration confers some risk (5.5% complications of intravenous hydration were recorded in the AMACING study). As a result the clinical protocol in the Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+) has been adapted, and patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) >29mL/min/1.73m2 no longer receive intravenous prophylactic hydration before or after procedures with intravascular iodinated contrast material administration. CINART is a one year prospective observational study with the aim to evaluate the consequences of the protocol change for 1. for incidences of CIN/CI-AKI, dialysis and mortality, 2. for clinical practice in terms of patient burden (complications of prophylaxis), hospital burden (extra hospitalisations for prophylaxis), and costs, as derived from the number of elective procedures carried out in patients formerly eligible for prophylaxis.
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has remained significant and severe complication of angiographic procedures despite the increasing use of preventative methods. It has been associated with prolonged hospital stay, high morality and the need for dialysis. Since classically used creatinine for diagnosing of CIN does not reflect the degree of tubular injury before 24-48 hours after exposure to contrast media alternative earlier biomarkers and preventative methods are needed. Remote ischemic preconditioning is a non-invasive and safe method which in some studies has been reported to protect against contrast-induced nephropathy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) (1) as an additional method to standard treatment to prevent subclinical and clinical contrast-induced acute kidney injury and (2) to assess its effect on functional properties of arterial wall, organ damage biomarkers and low molecular weight metabolites.
The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose of contrast (Omnipaque) administered for Computed Tomography Arteriograms (CTA) can be reduced without degradation of image quality. The hypothesis is that there is no difference in image quality using ultra-low dose contrast in CTA exams compared to routine, standard of care dose exams.