View clinical trials related to Consciousness Disorders.
Filter by:The aim of the study, which was planned in the experimental design type, was to determine the effect of the mindfulness-based stress reduction training on nurses' job stress. The sample of the study consisted of 70 nurses (35 in the experimental group, 35 in the control group) working in a university hospital in Çanakkale. The mindfulness-based stress reduction training was carried out as a group, once a week, for 8 weeks in total.
Caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness are highly prone to developing mental health issues. The aim of this study is to investigate the psychological symptoms and care burden of caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), and to examine which characteristics of patients were burden predictors to caregivers.
The goal of this observational study is to compare Nociception Coma Scale-Revised Recorded (NCS-R) scores obtained with the standard pressure on fingernail bed (standard stimulus, SS) versus other personalized painful stimuli (PS), in non-communicative patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), as indicated by professionals and caregivers involved in their care and rehabilitation. The study aims also to establish possible correlations between NCS-R and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R.) The main question : an integrated patient-centered approach for assessment of the physical pain, in which clinical measures and behavioral observations will be integrated, to understand and manage the pain intensity, may improve treatment and rehabilitation outcome. Specifically, a new version of NCS-R, adapted with PS, may produce more intentional and specific responses to pain-inducing maneuvers. Investigating pain perception in non-communicative patients, through recognition of a personalized source of nociception and pain, may avoid non specific, useless and harmful noxious tests (as with standard pain scales) and may provide tools for revealing nociception even in the lack of any response to standard clinical evaluation. Question 1: the superiority of personalized painful stimulus a standard painful stimulation in nin communicative patients. Question 2: the parallel recovery of painful stimuli responsiveness and consciousness Participants will Responsiveness and pain perception will be assessed respectively with the CRS-R and the NCS-R. Pain responses will be assessed by means of standard stimulus (NCS-R-SS, as used in the CRS-R) and personalized stimulation (NCS-R-PS), at admission and discharge. CRS-R will be administered within the first month after admission, at least 5 times in different days, choosing the highest score as reference and repeated during recovery of consciousness or discharge. After informed consent by patient's legal representative or the primary caregiver, for the purpose of the study, caregivers (including relatives, nurses, therapists, physicians) will be asked to record all manoeuvres they feel are associated with potential pain, with a window of observation of the rehabilitation and nursing staff of around one week to identify the personalized painful stimulus (about the second week after admission at the rehabilitation ward). Amongst them, the manoeuvres that consistently over time induced the most motor/behaviour responses suggestive of pain perception, reported at least by 2 members of the rehabilitation staff or by one of them and one caregiver, will be chosen as the personalized stimulus (PS). NCS-R with standard stimulus (NCS-R-SS) and with personalized stimulus (NCS-R-PS), will be recorded within 30 days after admission, alternating the order of the 2 painful stimulations; CRS-R will be recorded accordingly, in parallel to NCS-R-SS and NCS-R-PS and will be blindly recorded, at the same time, by two different rehabilitation staff members, to assess inter-rater reliability, whereas two of them will repeat both NCS-R_SS and NCS-R-PS during the same week to assess intra-rater reliability of both NCS-R-SS and NCS-R-PS, with an interval of at least 6 hours from the last pain killer or anti-spastic drugs administration, including GABAergic, anti-inflammatory drugs or opiates. Both CRS-R and NCS-R (SS and PS) will be repeated 1 month and 3 months after the first assessment with the same procedures of the first time.
This pilot study in healthy volunteers aims to determine if biological sex has an impact on recovery from dexmedetomidine-induced unconsciousness, and if transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) can be used to measure brain complexity during dexmedetomidine sedation without arousing study participants.
The goal of this observational retrospective study is to investigate and compare the clinical evolution of a sample of patients with the diagnosis of MCS+ versus MCS- according to the CRS-R. The main questions it aims to answer are the presence of differences in the likelihood of emergence from the MCS (EMCS) between these two groups and in the progress of disability and functional independence after the EMCS.
Currently, there are significant challenges in the clinical assessment of patients with consciousness disorders, such as distinguishing between vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), and predicting patient prognosis. This study aims to utilize different research techniques, such as auditory stimulation, as well as modified microstate methods, to enhance the disease classification and prognosis prediction of patients with chronic consciousness disorders.
Background: Despite established evidence supporting the use of tDCS in the adult patient with disorders of consciousness, its use in paediatric patients with brain injury is still limited. Regarding the use of tDCS in paediatric patients with DoC, the scientific evidence still appears to be preliminary about the safety profile and requires further data before investigating efficacy on a broad scale. In fact, although the method has been shown to be safe in other clinical conditions, efficacy and tolerability in children with DoC may vary significantly depending on differences in activation threshold and the presence of underlying pathological electrical activity The implementation of clinical trials investigating the safety and tolerability of tDCS in paediatric patients with DoC now represents an essential first step for a future determination of the efficacy of this method in a population for which therapeutic options are currently extremely limited Objective: The study aim to verify the safety of tDCS treatment and to evaluate the effectiveness of stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex by tDCS in promoting improvement in the level of consciousness in paediatric patients with Disorders of Consciousness. Method: in this mono-center, randomised, double blind cross-over controlled pilot study, real or sham tDCS were applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF) cortex of paediatric patients with disorders of consciousness for two weeks, followed by two weeks of washout, then real or sham tDCS were applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF) cortex for other two weeks, followed by another two weeks of washout.
Disorders of consciousness (DOC) refers to the persistent loss of consciousness after 28 days in patients with brain injury caused by trauma, stroke, or hypoxia. It includes coma, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state. At present, there is no effective treatment for DOC. Only one RCT study of amantadine has proved that it may be effective for the treatment of DOC. In recent years, more evidence has shown that neuromodulation technology is beneficial to the recovery of DOC. Cervical spinal cord stimulation surgery is a new treatment method for patients with DOC. Electrodes are implanted in the high cervical spinal cord C2-C5. By adjusting different electrical stimulation parameters, it has a wake-promoting effect. In this study, patients were selected into the spinal cord stimulation group and the conventional treatment group according to the wishes of their families. The patients in the spinal cord stimulation group were given 21 days of cervical spinal cord stimulation treatment on the basis of conventional brain rehabilitation. Patients were followed up routinely and completed designated examinations at 12 months to determine the safety and efficacy of cervical spinal cord stimulation therapy.
This study first aims to validate the feasibility of a multimodal 5-day 20-minute tACS protocol in subacute brain-injured patients with a disorder of consciousness during their ICU stay, and conduct a clinical pilot study (validation phase). Upon completion of this validation phase and according to obtained results, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare the effects of the 5-day active 10Hz-tACS protocol with a 5-day sham-tACS protocol on brain dynamics modulation. This study will also compare intervention conditions on recovery of consciousness, cognition and function using short-term and long-term measurements.
Consciousness-specific Brain Network Connection of Propofol Sedation and Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness based on Electroencephalography and Auditory Event-related Potentials