View clinical trials related to Communication.
Filter by:Backround: Positive psychotherapy (PPT) divides conflicts into three. One of these conflicts is the key conflicts that occur frequently in daily life and arise from the unbalanced use of courtesy and honesty. Avoiding key conflicts depends on the balanced use of courtesy and honesty. Nursing students' balance of courtesy and honesty while communicating will reduce key conflicts and increase the level of effective communication skills. This is important in terms of making a significant contribution to the quality of nursing care. Objectives: This research was conducted to determine the effect of PPT-based kindness and honesty psychoeducation on the level of effective communication skills of nursing students. Design: The study is a randomized controlled, pretest-posttest design, and a single-blind study. Settings and participants: This research will conduct with 64 undergraduate nursing students who took a psychiatric nursing course. Methods: Students will divid into intervention and control groups by simple randomization method. "Personal information form and effective communication skills scale" will apply to the intervention and control groups. After the pre-measurements will apply, the intervention group received courtesy and honesty key (KMCI) psychoeducation for 5 weeks, and no intervention will apply to the control group. Afterwards, a post-test will apply to both groups. Key words: Positive psychotherapy, effective communication skills, nursing students, psychoeducation, courtesy and honesty.
The ability to communicate and cooperate effectively is essential in geriatric nursing. However, nursing teachers lacked the exploration of the development of this ability and teaching evaluation in previous studies. The investigators used a systematic process to investigate methods for achieving the following goals: 1. Cultivate a positive attitude toward the elderly among nursing students. 2. Improve nursing students' communication competence and interaction skills when providing advanced health care services. 3. Improve the teaching skills of professional nursing instructors.
Advance care planning (ACP) represents a process whereby a patient, in consultation with healthcare professionals, family members and important others, makes decisions about his or her future healthcare and wishes for end-of-life care and is widely advocated to improve end-of-life care for patients with heart failure (HF). Despite the growing emphasis on communication with HF patients and their relatives, there is no tradition in Denmark for systematical communication about wishes for end-of-life care. The aim of the study is to adapt the ACP to a new contest and target group and determine the feasibility and acceptable recruitment rate and completeness of potential outcome measures for a future RCT. A study of a complex intervention will be conducted to address all elements of an adapted ACP intervention in HF patients (NYHA class III, IV) and their relatives. Patients will be identified and recruited by HF specialist nurses or a cardiologist from the Department of Cardiology at North Zealand Hospital. The HF specialist nurses or the cardiologist will inform the patients about the study and obtain consent for the research staff to contact the patients by telephone. The patients will be further informed by the research staff and asked to fill out the baseline questionnaires. The patients will be asked to select the closest relatives who also will be offered participation. Included patients will receive an invitation with the date and time of their ACP meeting in their electronic patient record. They will be offered an ACP discussion which covers components e.g. symptom control, discussions on prognosis and illness limitations, and wishes for future and end-of-life care. Baseline and follow-up (4 and 12 weeks after the ACP meeting) will be made with disease-specific and generic questionnaires. Qualitative interview data will be obtained, and thematic analysis will uncover the patients, relatives and the clinician's perspectives and satisfaction with the intervention.
Background: There is significant variation in how clinicians currently present information to parents in periviable labour. Whilst each conversation with an individual set of parents will vary, the current level of variation is extreme. In collaborative discussions with the neonatal parental advisory group whilst designing this project, parents reported numerous experiences of significant variation in practice between clinicians in relation to periviable delivery management. There is a pressing issue of injustice here as the hospital or clinician the parent presents to in labour should not restrict their access to information and options for management at delivery. Parents should be empowered and engaged in making an individualised decision for their infant. However, this is not possible if information is not accurately presented to them. There is a gap in knowledge about what information is vital to include in periviable decision-making conversations between parents and healthcare professionals. This study aims to address this important gap in knowledge. Research Question: How can information sharing and decision-making conversations between healthcare professionals and parents prior to periviable birth be improved? Research Aims: 1. To gain understanding of current UK-wide antenatal optimisation practices for infants born at periviable gestations. 2. To establish an evidence-based conversational structure for pre-delivery periviable decision-making discussions, and a prioritised set of key discussion topics derived from parental consensus and clinician input. 3. To develop a set of parent and clinician derived recommendations to improve pre-delivery periviable decision-making conversations. Methodology: The study would progress along the following structure: 1. Literature Review of literature related to how and what information is presented to parents facing periviable labour by healthcare professionals. 2. Semi-structured interviews with clinicians and parents. The aim will be to determine an evidence-based set of priorities for each group and identify the differences in priorities and barriers that exist in communication between parents and clinicians. 3. National Evaluation of current periviable management practices across the UK. This will benchmark and expose variation in current practice. 4. Analysis of pre-delivery periviable conversations. 5. Focus groups with parents and clinicians to consolidate and stratify key priority themes for periviable decision-making conversations and assess acceptability of developing parent-centred periviable delivery resources. 6. Parent survey of parent-assessed long-term outcomes for periviable delivery survivors. Impact and Dissemination: This study will investigate the key topic areas and conversational structure of pre-delivery periviable decision-making conversations, aiming to provide evidence-based recommendations for improvement.
The aim of the study will be to evaluate the effect of oral messages on wrist and finger flexor muscle activity during the application of sham therapy in the form of paper plaster. For years, research has been conducted on the effects of dynamic plaster and rigid plaster on muscle function. In many cases, reports from different authors are contradictory. Therefore, the planned study will use placebo paper plaster with no proven therapeutic effect.
This pilot study is a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial in a tertiary pediatric emergency department with two parallel groups of voluntary post-graduate year [PGY] 1 to 5 pediatric residents and registered pediatric emergency nurses. The impact of an mHealth support tool will be compared to conventional methods on the retrieval of laboratory data from the patient's electronic record, and on team collaboration in a semi-simulated emergency department environment. Ten participants are randomized (1:1). The primary endpoint is the time from the availability of new laboratory results for a given patient to their consideration by participants, measured in minutes using a stopwatch.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a blended learning programme in enhancing the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of final-year nursing students in conducting clinical handovers.
This experimental study aims to investigate the effect of different types of educational interventions on overcoming Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy among the Higher School of Economics (HSE) bachelor students in Russia.
This study is being conducted to better understand the preferences and recommendations of patients and parents regarding optimal ways to share prognostic communication. Specifically, to learn what stakeholders (i.e., patients, parents, and doctors) believe to be the "right" content, timing, and delivery of this important information. Specific Aim 1 - To define key stakeholder preferences and recommendations for timing, content, and delivery of prognostic communication across the advancing illness course and bereavement. Specific Aim 2 - To engage stakeholders in the design of a patient/parent centered RIGHTime framework and communication intervention to promote individualized, timely prognostic disclosure.
This study is a pilot test of The Art of Medicine Series, a smartphone-based educational tool to improve clinician-patient communication. Investigators will enroll clinicians (residents, fellows, attending physicians) and family caregivers (most often parents) from the Children's Wisconsin neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Participants will then receive a series of links to short, animated videos sent to their phone by text message. Each video teaches best-practice communication techniques such as how patients can prompt teach back and how clinicians can avoid biased phrasing in delivering news. Over the 4-week intervention (the length of resident's rotation), clinicians will receive 15 videos and patients will receive 8 videos. Communication skills of clinicians and patients will be assessed pre and post intervention using validated measures and participants' engagement with the videos will be tracked with software in the website.