Calcium Aluminosilicate Anti-Diarrheal in Treating and Preventing Diarrhea in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Irinotecan

Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

Phase II, Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of CASAD vs. Placebo for the Treatment and Prevention of Diarrhea in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00748215
• Other study ID #: MDA-2008-0005
• Secondary ID: MDA-2008-0005CDR
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: February 4, 2009
• Est. completion date: August 12, 2014

Study information

• Verified date: November 2020
• Source: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

RATIONALE: Calcium aluminosilicate anti-diarrheal (CASAD) may help treat and prevent diarrhea caused by irinotecan. It is not yet known whether CASAD is more effective than a placebo in treating and preventing diarrhea in patients receiving irinotecan. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying CASAD to see how well it works compared with a placebo in treating and preventing diarrhea in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan.

Description:

OBJECTIVES: Primary - To compare the efficacy of calcium aluminosilicate anti-diarrheal (CASAD) versus placebo in reducing the incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving an irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimen. Secondary - To compare stools per day in patients treated with these drugs. - To compare chemotherapy dose reductions and delays due to diarrhea in patients treated with these drugs. - To compare quality of life of patients treated with these drugs. - To compare the safety of these drugs in these patients. - To compare the incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea in patients treated with these drugs. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to chemotherapy regimen (irinotecan hydrochloride in combination with fluorouracil and/or biologic therapy vs irinotecan hydrochloride alone). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive oral calcium aluminosilicate anti-diarrheal (CASAD) 4 times daily for 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who develop grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and are removed from the study may receive CASAD for an additional 6 weeks. - Arm II: Patients receive oral placebo 4 times daily for 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who develop grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and are removed from the study may then receive CASAD for 6 weeks. Patients undergo quality-of-life assessment at baseline and at weeks 3, 5, and 6. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed for 30 days.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 100
• Est. completion date: August 12, 2014
• Est. primary completion date: August 12, 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

• Diagnosis of colorectal cancer
• Metastatic disease
• Scheduled to receive irinotecan hydrochloride alone or in combination with fluorouracil, cetuximab, leucovorin calcium, or other biological therapy (including bevacizumab)
• No uncontrolled brain metastasis
• Previously treated brain metastasis allowed

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
• Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,000/mm³
• Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
• Total bilirubin < 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
• Aspartate aminotransferase (AST or SGOT) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT or SGPT) < 2.5 times ULN (< 5 times ULN if liver metastasis is present)
• Alkaline phosphatase < 2.5 times ULN
• Creatinine clearance > 35 mL/min
• Not pregnant or nursing
• Negative pregnancy test
• Fertile patients must use effective contraception
• No known UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) deficiency with homozygotes.
• No known history of Gilbert's disease
• No diarrhea > grade 1
• No serious illness or medical condition, including any of the following:
• Uncontrolled congestive heart failure
• Uncontrolled hypertension (i.e., blood pressure > 150/100 mm Hg)
• Uncontrolled arrhythmia
• Active angina pectoris
• Symptomatic heart disease according to New York Heart Association(NYHA) class II-IV
• No serious uncontrolled active infection
• No existing colostomy or ileostomy
• Not able to take and document oral study medications
• No history of allergies to irinotecan hydrochloride
• No history of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders that would preclude giving consent or participating in study treatment or follow up

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

• See Disease Characteristics
• Prior treatment for metastatic disease allowed
• At least 4 weeks since prior irinotecan
• More than 2 weeks since prior chemotherapy
• Irinotecan alone or in combination with other chemotherapy or biologic agents allowed
• More than 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy
• No concurrent radiotherapy
• No concurrent medication schedule that does not permit a 2-hour window between administration of calcium aluminosilicate anti-diarrheal (CASAD) and other medications

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chemotherapeutic Agent Toxicity
• Colorectal Cancer
• Colorectal Neoplasms
• Diarrhea

Intervention

Drug:
• calcium aluminosilicate anti-diarrheal
Given orally

Other:
• placebo
Given orally

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas	Houston	Texas
United States	CCOP - Columbia River Oncology Program	Portland	Oregon

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center	National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Diarrhea	One hundred patients were randomized equally between CASAD and placebo arms in order to assess whether CASAD was efficacious in preventing grade 3/4 diarrhea within 6 weeks for each arm compared. Bayesian futility monitoring in the study with a recommendation to stop the trial for futility if it became clear that CASAD was not better than placebo.	First 6 weeks from baseline in initial intervention with CASAD or PLACEBO

External Links

•   Related Info