View clinical trials related to Colorectal Adenoma.
Filter by:This research study is evaluating the effect of AMR101 as a possible chemopreventive agent to reduce risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with a history of colorectal adenoma. - The name of the study drug involved in this study is: -- AMR101 (VASCEPA).
This study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, multi-center, feasibility study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ColubrisMX ELS System in patients undergoing transanal endoluminal procedures, specifically colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal cancer prevention by allowing the resection of superficial colorectal adenomas or adenocarcinomas. This protection, more effective in the left colon than in the right colon, is imperfect and there are some adenomas and cancers omitted during colonoscopy. The G-EYE colonoscope equipped with an integrated distal balloon would better unfold the haustrations and stabilize the endoscope. Thus, the detection rate of adenomas would be improved by this better vision. The main objective of this study is to confirm that the use of the G-EYE colonoscope allows better detection of adenomatous polyps, decrease the rate of omitted adenomes and then is more effective.
Protocol Title: Three Arm Prospective Randomized controlled trial of High-Definition White-light colonoscopy versus High-Definition White-light colonoscopy with Reveal® Distal Attachment Cap versus High-Definition White-light colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision for the detection of colorectal adenomas Hypothesis: Detection rate of adenomas in patients will be higher in procedures performed with High-Definition White-light (HDWL) colonoscopy with Reveal® distal attachment cap and HDWL colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision compared to HDWL colonoscopes alone Design: Multicenter, Prospective, randomized controlled study Primary Aim: To compare the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma detected during HDWL colonoscopy versus HDWL colonoscopy with Reveal® distal attachment cap versus HDWL colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision. Secondary Aims: To compare the number of adenomas detected per subject with HDWL colonoscopy versus HDWL colonoscopy with Reveal® distal attachment cap versus HDWL colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision. To compare the detection rates for polyp subtypes (including advanced adenomas, serrated polyps, right sided adenomas, etc.), cecal intubation rate, insertion time, withdrawal time, and complications of HDWL colonoscopy versus HDWL colonoscopy with Reveal® distal attachment cap versus HDWL colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision.
Previous researches demonstrated that a prepackaged low-residue diet (LRD) could achieve better bowel preparation quality compared with a self-prepared LRD. However, up to now, there has been no widely acceptable standard of LRD for bowel preparation. Moreover, these prepackaged LRD adopted in previous studies mainly consisted of traditional foods without further processing. Recently, a prepackaged LRD for Special Medical Purpose was specifically designed for bowel preparation. This trail was to compare the impact of the prepackaged LRD on bowel preparation for colonoscopy with self-prepared LRD by patients.
In the UK, around 1 in 16 men and 1 in 20 women will develop bowel cancer at some point in their lives. Most bowel cancers happen when a type of growth in the bowel called an adenoma eventually becomes cancerous. Cutting out adenomas reduces the risk of developing bowel cancer. Certain people are more likely to have adenomas than others, for example people who are overweight. People who are overweight are also more likely to develop liver disease by laying too much fat down in the liver. Studies in Asia have shown that people with fatty liver disease are more likely to have adenomas and these are more commonly found in the part of the bowel (right colon) furthest from the bottom end. Information on the link between obesity, fatty liver disease and adenomas is very limited, particularly in the Western population. The investigators will assess the link between body weight, fatty liver and adenomas in the UK population. 1430 patients will be invited; some through the bowel cancer screening programme and some with symptoms such as low blood count, bleeding or changed bowel habit. These patients will already have been referred for a camera test looking into the bowel, called a colonoscopy. Information including height, weight and some health questions will be taken. Blood samples will be taken. The investigators will compare the number of patients with adenomas who have liver disease or who are overweight with those who don't. This information will be used to develop a scoring system to predict risk of adenomas. This will help the investigators to decide if undertaking colonoscopies in these patients will identify those at increased risk of bowel cancer.
The study aims to compare the results between colonoscopies with two different attachments on the distal end of the colonoscope.
The study aims to compare the results between a standard colonoscopy to a colonoscopy with an attachment on the distal end of the colonoscope.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer in Denmark, and mortality among patients is high. Patients presenting with alarm symptoms of CRC are referred to colonoscopy in the cancer patient pathway for CRC. However, the proportion of patients with alarm symptoms who have CRC is below 10%. Simultaneously, the burden on endoscopy units to conduct fast-track colonoscopies is growing. Occult blood in the faeces may be an early sign of cancer or precancerous lesions, and can be detected by an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT). Few studies have examined the diagnostic properties of the iFOBT among symptomatic patients, and reported sensitivities ranging from 88%-100%, specificities from 77%-94%, and negative predictive values from 98%-100%. These results were derived from diverse patient populations, and used different cut-offs to define positive test results. Using iFOBT may be a valuable tool for the GP when deciding on referral of the patient to the cancer patient pathway. However, evidence is needed on the diagnostic accuracy of the test to detect CRC among patients presenting with alarm symptoms. Hypothesis: In patients presenting with alarm symptoms of CRC, detection of faecal occult blood by iFOBT is an accurate measure of the presence of colonic lesions. Aim: The aim of the study is to examine the diagnostic accuracy of the iFOBT among symptomatic patients referred to colonoscopy in the cancer patient pathway for CRC. Materials and methods: The project is conducted as a diagnostic accuracy study. Patients appointed for colonoscopy will be invited to collect a faecal sample and mail it for analysis. The iFOBT result will be registered in a computer-based laboratory information system. The result of the colonoscopy will be registered in Danish national health registries. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated as measures of the diagnostic properties of the iFOBT, using the result of colonoscopy as the reference standard. The accuracy of the test by type of alarm symptom will also be assessed. Perspectives: The study will provide new and valuable data to evaluate the referral criteria for the cancer patient pathway. Given a good discriminatory ability of the iFOBT among symptomatic patients, fast-track colonoscopy may not be necessary as a first-choice examination in the diagnostic work-up of these patients.
This study seeks to compare colonoscopy results between a standard method and one using a distal scope attachment (Endocuff Vision).