View clinical trials related to Cognitive Dysfunction.
Filter by:local opera viewing combined medical gymnastics for elderly PSCI
This study will evaluate the effects of a form of non-invasive brain stimulation on brain functioning and memory in cognitively intact older adults (healthy controls, HC) and in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
The trial is designed to examine whether Yizhi Baduanjin could slow down and improve in memory, logical thinking and cerebral function in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). 30 MCI patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to Yizhi Baduanjin intervention group control group for 6 months. The primary outcome is changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaire; other outcome includes Cognitive Function Assessment questionnaire.
The aims of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions program in preventing progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment in the short term, at Nhân dân Gia Định Hospital, Hồ Chí Minh City.
This study seeks conduct a pilot study to test whether a cognitive training program can improve processing speed abilities in individuals with acute traumatic spinal cord injury.
Anesthesia and perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders in the Elderly patients undergoing hip fracture Surgery platform trial (ANDES platform trial): A pragmatic multi-arm, adaptive, open label, multicenter randomized controlled platform trial to assess the effect of different enhance anesthesia technique in perioperative neurocognitive function, as compared to standard anesthesia care in the elderly patients undergoing hip fracture
Background: Nature positively affects people living with dementia. However, there are a lack of nature-based interventions for people living with mild cognitive impairment or dementia who reside in the community. Aim: This study is testing a caregiver-led nature-based intervention, which has been co-developed with people living with dementia, supporters/caregivers and professionals, and the study design and set-up will also be evaluated. The results will help provide evidence for whether or not to carry out a larger study in the future and will also contribute to the evidence of nature-based interventions for people living with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Methods: People from the NHS and charities with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, and their supporters/caregivers (this pair of participants are called a 'dyad') will be approached. The PhD researcher and dyads will meet to discuss the information sheet, answer any questions, then if they'd like to take part, dyads will each complete a consent form and questionnaire asking about demographics, mental health, and service use. A computer will then randomly assign the dyads into the intervention group or waitlist-control group (who will receive the intervention at the end of the study). Supporters/caregivers in the intervention group will attend a one-off online training session on how to use the manual. The intervention involves 8 weekly sessions of nature-based activities, including a session evaluation sheet to complete for each session. The PhD researcher will call the supporters/caregivers twice during the intervention to check in. At the end of the intervention, dyads will complete another questionnaire each, and then those in the waitlist-control group will have the opportunity to take part in the intervention. There is also an optional interview that dyads can take part in to talk about their experience of the intervention and the study set-up.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of a dual-task training intervention on cognitive function,physical function, depression symptoms and quality of life in middle-aged and elderly people with cognitive impairment. A Randomized experimental research design is conduced to recruited 196 middle-aged and elderly people: potentially reversible or reversible cognitive decline to attend this study. All participants are randomly allocated into dual-task training, walking training alone, and cognitive training alone and the waiting list control group. The measurements include: demographic and disease data, frailty symptoms (The FRAIL Scale ,Time up and go test ,Sit-to-stand test), cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale Chinese version), depressive symptoms (Chinese version of Clinical Depression Symptom Assessment Scale) and life Quality (Taiwan's simplified version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire). The results of the study will use Generalized Liner Models and Pearson's product difference correlation analysis to confirm the impact of dual task training intervention on physical function, cognitive function, and depressive symptoms in middle-aged and elderly people with cognitive impairment effect on quality of life.
The goal of this study is to learn more about the changes in the brains of patients with cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. What findings can be used to earlier detect patients that will develop Alzheimers? 2. Which differences are seen between healthy and cognitively impaired patients? 3. Which differences are seen between patients with Alzheimers disease? Participants will undergo: - Cognitive tests - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - Electroencephalography (EEG) - Blood sample collection - Fecal sample collection - A randomized group will undergo polysomnography analysis.
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias lead to marked declines in daily functioning, independence, and quality of life. One of the earliest cognitive changes in these conditions is impairment in prospective memory, or the ability to remember future intentions such as taking medications at a given time. Prior intervention studies that targeted prospective memory used mnemonic strategies or cognitive training, but these approaches resulted in modest gains in clinical populations. By contrast, a Stage I pilot trial indicated that smartphone-based memory aids (reminder apps) can be accepted and used by persons with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia to improve both subjective and objective prospective memory performance. The investigators will now test for efficacy, durability, and generalizability of benefits across diverse samples in a Stage II randomized controlled trial. Some 200 participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia will be recruited, half of whom will be from digitally-disadvantaged backgrounds (low socioeconomic status, rural, or historically underrepresented groups). Participants will complete baseline assessments and then be randomly assigned to a smartphone reminder app intervention or an active control condition that uses a paper- based memory support system. Across a 4-week intervention period, participants will complete patient-selected and experimenter-assigned prospective memory assessments and receive booster training sessions to promote self-efficacy with the intervention/control system. Durability of effects will be assessed at 3-month and 6-month follow-up sessions. As a secondary aim, study partners will be simultaneously enrolled to collect informant ratings, track how much study partners assist the participants, and determine whether improving prospective memory in patients improves quality of life in study partners (e.g., by reducing the double to-do list burden of remembering for themselves and for care recipients). As a third aim, the investigators will identify barriers and facilitators to smartphone interventions in digitally-disadvantaged individuals who have historically been underrepresented in technology and dementia research.