Effectiveness & Safety of Using Prontosan to Treat Bacterial Biofilm

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Prontosan wound irrigation solution comparing with Normal Saline on the removal of wound bacterial biofilm through observing the morphological characteristics and development of bacterial biofilm in chronic wound patients with secondary infections. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B . - Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups. - 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups. - Wound healing rate - Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score. - Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound. - Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm. Participants will be randomized to experimental group or Control group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution or normal saline will be extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution or normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06185465
Study type	Interventional
Source	The First Hospital of Jilin University
Contact	Jia'ao Yu, Professor
Phone	+86 13804337395
Email	yuja@jlu.edu.cn
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	January 3, 2024
Completion date	February 28, 2025

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05023135` - DeepView SnapShot Portable (DV-SSP): Device Training Study
Completed	`NCT05276869` - Reliability and Feasibility of WeeFIM Instrument to Measure Functional Independence in Pediatric Burns
Completed	`NCT04548635` - VR for Burn Dressing Changes at Home	Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06076031` - Effects of Applying Streaming Media on Reducing Pain in Patient With Second-degree Burn During Changing Dressing	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05084248` - Vitamin D Deficiency in Adults Following a Major Burn Injury	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03113253` - TRANexamic Acid to Reduce Bleeding in BURN Surgery	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT04090424` - Assessment of Safety and Effectiveness of NovoSorb® BTM in Severe Burns	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05649891` - Checklists Resuscitation Emergency Department	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT03159182` - Study of Silicone Material Inserts To Treat Burn Scars	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02904941` - Human Amniotic Versus Synthetic Membrane as a Transient Skin Cover for Pediatric Burns	N/A
Completed	`NCT02681757` - Comparison of Mepitel Ag vs Antibiotic Ointment Used With Soft Cast Technique for Treatment of Pediatric Burns	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01812941` - Evaluation of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Severe Burn and Trauma Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT01437852` - StrataGraft® Skin Tissue as an Alternative to Autografting Deep Partial-Thickness Burns	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT01214811` - Open Multi-centre Investigation to Evaluate Signs and Symptoms of Local Inflammation/Infection on Chronic Ulcers and Partial Thickness Burns When Using Mepilex Border Ag as an Anti-microbial Wound Dressing	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01061502` - Efficacy Study of a Bioelectric Dressing to Treat Skin Graft Donor Site Wounds	Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated	`NCT00822796` - Thermogard™ Efficacy Trial	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00824681` - Effect of Music Therapy on Families of Burn Patients	Phase 1
Terminated	`NCT00634166` - Effects of Therapy With Sulfamylon® 5% Topical Solution Compared to a Historical Control Group	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT00464386` - Continuous Glucose Monitoring (POC) in the ICU	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00216983` - Proline Metabolism in Severely Burned Patients: Effect of Modulated Parenteral Feeding	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Effectiveness and Safety of Using Prontosan to Treat Bacterial Biofilm

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms