View clinical trials related to Chronic Kidney Disease.
Filter by:Rationale: Several studies have shown that higher urinary potassium excretion (as proxy for potassium intake) is associated with better kidney outcomes, lower blood pressure and improved survival. These associations are also observed in patients with (advanced) CKD. However, application in daily practice in patients with CKD, is impaired by the risk of hyperkalemia, due to metabolic acidosis and impaired renal potassium excretion in these patients. As a consequence, patients with CKD are advised to restrict their intake of fruit and vegetables, as these healthy food components are important sources of dietary potassium. This is particularly undesirable for patients with CKD in view of the very high risk of cardiovascular disease. Concomitant use of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) could allow a more liberal intake of fruit and vegetables for patients with CKD, as SZC effectively treats hyperkalemia and counteracts metabolic acidosis [1]. With this strategy, the beneficial effects of potassium in fruits and vegetables on (vascular) health could also become accessible to patients with CKD. Objective: To demonstrate that a potassium-rich diet, including the use of SZC as potential rescue treatment (in case of hyperkalemia), does not result in an unacceptable rise in plasma potassium (i.e. max rise of 0.5 mmol/L and no hyperkalemia). Study Design: Investigator initiated, single center, cross-over randomized clinical trial with non-inferiority design (14 weeks, 2 groups: regular diets vs. diet with potassium rich fruits and vegetables with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate if necessary) Study population: Outpatients ( age ≥ 18 years ) with chronic kidney disease stage IIIb/IV and use of inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system (RASi). Intervention: Addition of fruit- and vegetables that contain 40 mmol of potassium on top of regular diet. Addition of SZC after 1 week in case hyperkaliemia develops (serum potassium > 5,5 mmol/L). Weekly measurement of plasma potassium and dose adjustment of SZC if needed
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of balcinrenone/dapagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin alone on patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and albuminuria. This study will evaluate the effect of the balcinrenone/dapagliflozin on urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), compared with dapagliflozin in patients with CKD. This is a dose-finding study aiming to identify an optimal dose of balcinrenone/dapagliflozin for a future Phase III study in patients with CKD.
High blood pressure is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease and is common in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Intradialytic hypotension is associated with an adverse prognosis. More knowledge is needed to identify patients at high risk for intradialytic hypotension and dialysis-associated hypotensive episodes. The aim of this observational single-center pilot study is to evaluate whether point-of-care ultrasound measurements may predict intradialytic hypotension and orthostatic blood pressure falls, in patients with chronic kidney disease who undergo maintenance hemodialysis.
The investigators hypothesize that Ketosteril can improve sarcopenia in patients with renal disease without increasing the burden on the kidneys and causing deterioration of renal function. Therefore, this study intends to take patients with CKD stage 3-4 and sarcopenia as the research object, give Ketosteril intervention or not to patients on the base of low-protein diet, and clarify the clinical benefits of Ketosteril prescription for improving sarcopenia in patients with CKD.
Pain is one of the most common symptoms among patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), and often goes unrecognized or inadequately managed in hemodialysis patients. More than 50% of patients undergoing hemodialysis suffer from pain, with 75% of them being treated ineffectively due to healthcare professionals' lack of awareness of this symptom. Therefore, pain management in this population is a complex and challenging task for healthcare providers. The most prevalent pain syndromes in hemodialysis patients include musculoskeletal disorders, metabolic neuropathies, in addition to typical intradialytic pain. The aim of this study is to assess the presence and characteristics of chronic pain in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis to determine whether it is relevant to include the management of chronic pain in the holistic treatment (physical activity, nutrition, and psychological support) already being implemented in various studies for these patients.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two health system-based approaches for offering kidney failure treatment options to older patients with kidney failure, specifically, to ensure patients are actively involved in a shared decision making (SDM) process covering a full range of treatment choices and have meaningful access to that full range of choices. These include standard in-center or home dialysis as well as alternative treatment plans (ATPs): active medical care without dialysis, time-limited trial of dialysis, palliative dialysis, and deciding not to decide. Approach 1 - Educate and Engage: Nephrology practices encourage their patients to a) participate in a kidney disease education program providing a balanced presentation of all options including ATPs, b) use evidence-based patient decision aids that include ATPs, and c) engage in SDM with staff trained in communication skills and best practices. Approach 2 - Educate and Engage Plus Kidney Supportive Care Program: Nephrology practices add a primary palliative care program to support patients who choose ATPs and their families. The program provides care coordination, symptom management, advance care planning, and psychosocial support to supplement usual care from their nephrologist. To compare the two approaches, the investigators will conduct a repeated, cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trial involving 28 chronic kidney disease clinics at 10 practice organizations around the United States. Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of Approaches 1 and 2 in a) increasing proportion of patients choosing ATP and b) reducing patient-reported decisional conflict about treatment. Aim 2: Compare the patient and family experience of ATP care between Approaches 1 and 2 in terms of quality of life, services used, and end of life (EOL) experience. Aim 2a will focus on experience while patients are receiving an ATP. Aim 2b will describe the EOL experience. Aim 3: Evaluate implementation of each approach through a mixed-methods design based on the expanded RE-AIM framework. For Aims 1 and 2, researchers will collect information by chart review and surveys with patients and caregivers. For Aim 3, information will be reported by site managers as part of monthly progress reports. Clinic administrators, clinical providers, and staff will complete surveys before and after implementation of each approach.
This study will look at how well a drug that reduced the amount of oxalate in the body works in patients that have kidney disease and need dialysis treatment. People with kidney disease often have higher levels of oxalate in the blood. People with kidney disease are also at higher risk of having heart attacks, heart disease and strokes (these are called cardiovascular diseases). It is thought that high oxalate levels may increase the risk of these diseases. So we would like to study if this medicine can lower the amount of oxalate in the blood of dialysis patients and see if there is any change in the health of their heart. This medicine is already used for people who have high oxalate levels because of a genetic cause and has been used safely for patients on dialysis. The study will put the participants randomly into either the group getting the study medicine or the group getting a placebo (this will be a solution of saline water). Neither participants not the doctors will know whether the drug or placebo is given until after the end of the study. At the start of the study we will ask all the participants to have an echocardiogram (an ultrasound of the heart) and again 6 months later at the end of the study. We will also take blood tests once a month when the participants come for dialysis.
The goal of this single-blinded randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention for patient self-management and successful renal replacement therapy in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients. The main question it aims to answer is whether the flipped class pedagogy in delivering the pre-dialysis program to CKD patients is effective. Participants will undergo a week-long intervention consisting of pre-class instructional videos, self-study tutorials, face-to-face sessions, and take-home exercises, and will be compared to those receiving the conventional educational course.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HRS-1780 tablets or Henagliflozin Proline tablets in patients with chronic kidney disease by evaluating UACR change from baseline to Week 13
Using a highly innovative methodology, the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), the purpose of this study is to pilot test, an optimization trial approach to develop and refine the decision partnering skills of persons with stage 4 chronic kidney disease and their caregivers. Using a 2x2x2 full factorial design, 64 dyads (patients and one identified caregiver) will be randomized to receive one or more lay coach-delivered decision partnering training components, based on Pearlin's Stress-Health Model of Family Caregiving and Rini's Social Support Effectiveness theory. The components include: 1) caregiver coaching on effective decision support (1 vs. 3 sessions); 2) caregiver decision support communication training (1 session vs. none); and 3) patient social support effectiveness psychoeducation (yes vs. no).