Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04905433 |
Other study ID # |
IMT and CR |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
March 1, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2022 |
Source |
Cairo University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
As an extension of previous work, in this study, a breathing retraining component is added
using breathing calisthenics and inspiratory muscle trainer for the classical cardiac
rehabilitation (CR), as an appealing option, to implement a comprehensive rehabilitation
protocol addressing the different patient-centered outcomes including different
cardiovascular, and respiratory complaints; increasing the benefits of classical CR;
detecting the impact of adding this on the cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, and discovering the
correlation between the CV and respiratory data.
Description:
A very large number of studies have demonstrated the positive effect of cardiac
rehabilitation (CR) and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on morbidity and mortality. Globally,
each year millions of patients with different cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and chest
diseases are enrolled in these programs. The exact effects may be slightly variable, but
generally, both CR and PR aim to improve the patient's condition and improve the overall
quality of life utilizing almost the same methods (exercise, and education).
Despite these positive effects, utilization rates of either CR or PR are around 30% in
Europe, with much less percentages in the Middle East. The reasons for the low engagement
rates are many; with most probably the main reasons are about individuality and reach.
Optimized CR programs have to be individually tailored; meeting the individual needs of every
single patient in the program. Worse knowing that the chest pain and breathlessness are
highly prevalent in general in CVD, and considered -in many cases as the chief complaint, and
the classical CR programs are neglecting these complaints; negatively affecting adherence
rates and patient-centered outcomes (PCO) which mostly extend much beyond the cardiovascular
complaints, to extend to the respiratory, and sleep complaints; questioning the reason why
breathing retraining methods are not yet considered as an integral part of the CR programs.
The reason that standard CR programs usually neglect these complaints, and only look for the
CV outcomes; is considering the other mentioned complaints as "out-of-context". However,
solid evidence is suggesting a strong correlation between respiratory, sleep, and CV
outcomes.
It has been previously investigated the impact of the CR on sleep, and there is a prior
estimate suggesting that 25% of the participants in the CR programs have already sleep
disorders, there is a strong correlation between the sleep and CV outcomes, and almost all of
the patients in the CR have respiratory symptoms including dyspnea and functional capacity
decline.
Therefore, it was suggested adding a breathing retraining component using breathing
calisthenics and inspiratory muscle trainer for the classical CR, as an appealing option, to
implement a comprehensive rehabilitation protocol addressing the different PCO including
different cardiovascular, and respiratory complaints; increasing the benefits of classical
CR; detecting the impact of adding this on the CV outcomes, and discovering the correlation
between the CV and respiratory data.