View clinical trials related to Cholangiocarcinoma.
Filter by:This is an open-label,single center,non-randomized,single arm exploratory study. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 antibody plus GEMOX as postoperative adjuvant therapy in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with positively metastatic lymph nodes.
The purpose of this research is to see if combining gemcitabine, cisplatin and Durvalumab chemotherapy treatments with a direct tumor therapy called Yittrium-90, will work better together to shrink the tumor and control cancer.
VALIDATION OF THE SUPERIORITY OF CONTRAST ENHANCED ENDOSCOPY TO STANDARD ENDOSCOPY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BILE DUCT TUMORS
This study aims to find out: 1. The tolerability of Cabotamig (ARB202) in adults with advanced solid gastrointestinal tumors who failed the standard treatment. People can participate if their tumor has the CDH17 marker. 2. To find out how study drug is broken down in the body 3. To know the effects of the study drug on the tumor.
Choledochal cysts are congenital cystic dilatations of the intra and/or extrahepatic bile duct. They have been considered a rare entity of the child population. Globally, they account for 1% of all biliary pathology benign, with a clearly higher incidence in Asian countries (1/5,000 in China, 1/1,000 in Japan, compared to 1/100,000-150,000 in Western countries). However, the number of adults diagnosed in recent years has increased by up to 70% due to improvements in imaging tests. Currently, the common bile duct malformation is considered a premalignant entity: although the data are not very precise, it is estimated that between 2.6% and 26% of patients diagnosed choledochal cyst, will develop cholangiocarcinoma. In this sense, we must bear in mind that most of the published literature is of Asian origin, where the rate of cholangiocarcinoma is 0.1-71/100,000 compared to 0.1-1.8/100,000 in Europe or 0.6-1/100,000 in the USA. The most used classification to differentiate the types of cysts is that of Todani. Following this classification, we would find a higher rate of malignancy on types I and IV. The recommendations found in the literature refer to the need for surgical intervention for choledochal cysts due to their high rate of malignancy. These recommendations are based on studies conducted in a symptomatic Asian population. We do not usually find in therapeutic algorithms the inclusion of various factors that could be involved in the development of malignancy such as episodes of cholangitis, presence of anomaly in the pancreatobiliary junction, presence of lithiasis in cystic dilatation, etc. Some surveys carried out among the scientific population reflect a lack of consensus on its management: in the same clinical situation, different surgery units specialized in hepatobiliary-pancreatic pathology would act in the opposite way (specifically surgical versus conservative treatment). Bile duct resection is not without complications, both short-term and long-term. Therefore, the patient's symptoms, age or comorbidities can play an important role in decision-making in the treatment of this pathology. This nationwide multicenter retrospective observational study aims to determine the clinical situation of this rare pathology in a Western environment. A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with choledochal cyst in the period between 2000 and 2020 is proposed. Demographic variables, risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma, symptoms associated with the cyst and its characteristics, diagnostic method, type of treatment, complications will be analyzed. Malignancy, time, and follow-up method will also be discussed. This study will attempt to answer questions about the incidence of choledochal cysts in our environment, their association with cholangiocarcinoma, the associated morbidity and mortality, as well as the therapeutic and follow-up attitudes adopted in the face of this rare pathology.
Brief Summary: This is a multicentric, retrospective, real-world study to investigate the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), with the perioperative characteristics and long-term overall survival being compared. We aimed to find out whether the minimally invasive surgery is safe or feasible for PHC. And we also want to find out patients with what kind of characteristic can be benefit from the minimally invasive surgery compared with the open approach.
Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, of which intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma accounts for 10%-15%. Surgical resection is the only curative method for ICC, but most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and only 15% of patients can undergo surgical resection. In locally advanced ICC patients without distant metastases, although the tumor was initially assessed as unresectable, these patients may have the opportunity for surgical resection after reducing the size tumor lesion and increasing the remnant liver volume through conversion therapy. The current standard first-line treatment for unresectable ICC is gemcitabine combined with cisplatin, with a median overall survival of only 11.7 months and an ORR of 26.1%. In view of the poor effect of the standard chemotherapy regimen, the NCCN guidelines recommend that patients could participate in clinical study. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy can increase the local blood drug concentration and improve the tumor regression rate. By reducing the dose of systemic chemotherapy drugs concentration, the incidence of adverse reactions can be reduced. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy may be a better choice for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. PD-1 immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy is expected to improve the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with sintilimab and bevacizumabin the treatment of unresectable ICC.
Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) has emerged as a medical advance with an important role in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary lesions. This technique has demonstrated higher sensitivity in the guidance for tissue acquisition when compared with standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). DSOC-guided biopsy is considered technically safe and successful for tissue collection. Hand in hand with the development of more precise diagnostic techniques, comes the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnostic assessment. For the past decade, the role of artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasing at a rapid pace. In the biliary tract, different models have been proposed for the characterization of malignant features. Nevertheless, to date, the discrepancy between the visual impression of the operator and the histological results obtained by cholangioscopy still present, affecting the accuracy the diagnosis. Based on the above, the investigators aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of AI for the guidance of tissue acquisition with DSOC compared to DSOC without AI for suspected cholangiocarcinoma. As a secondary aim, the investigators pursue to compare quality of AI-guided biopsies samples vs. DSOC biopsies without AI.
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of HAIC combined with donafenib and sintilimab in first-line treatment of unresectable ICC.
This is an open-label, dose-escalation, multi-center phase I study evaluating the safety of CF33-hNIS (hNIS - human sodium iodide symporter) administered via two routes of administration, intratumoral (IT) or intravenous (IV), either as a monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic or advanced solid tumors.