View clinical trials related to Chest Pain.
Filter by:Despite optimal angiographic result after stent implantation, a number of patients will undergo repeat angiography within 1 year of index procedure. EASY-PRIPCI is an observational study evaluating the incidence of abnormal physiology results in patients undergoing repeat angiography after uncomplicated percutaneous intervention (PCI).
In this study, clinical database and blood sample bank of acute chest pain (ACP) will be established at chest pain center of multi-center hospital. To explore new biomarkers and screen clinical indicators with effective risk stratification and prognostic evaluation for ACP through proteomics technology and statistics methods. Risk stratification and short-term and long-term prognostic evaluation models for high-risk ACP will be established using large data analysis.
Following surgery and treatment for breast cancer, many patients experience swelling of lymph nodes (lymphedema) or accumulation of fluid (seroma) that can cause pain, restrict movement, and reduce quality of life. Current treatments include massage, pressure dressings, and drainage, but these are often ineffective and do not last. Physical activity, in particular swimming, has been linked to improvement in lymphedema/seroma symptoms, but more research is required to determine whether or not this type of treatment is effective.
This study will evaluate the ability of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA), used as a first-line diagnostic tool in women with stable chest pain and low risk for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), to reduce the number of women requiring more than one diagnostic test to rule in or rule out CAD. Half of the participants will undergo CCTA as the first test to investigate stable chest pain, while the other half will undergo any test ordered by their family physician.
Traumatic rib fractures (RF) are a relatively common occurrence in patients of all ages, with a 10% incidence in all trauma patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adequate analgesia is paramount for preventing pulmonary complications and can reduce morbidity and mortality. There is longstanding evidence of lidocaine's effectiveness and safety in the post-operative patient and the investigators hypothesize that this modality may prove to be ideal in trauma patients with RF. Therefore, it is imperative that intravenous lidocaine be investigated to ascertain if there is significant benefit for pain reduction in patients who have sustained rib fractures. A single-centre, double-blind, randomized control trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a 72-96 hour IV lidocaine infusion plus standard analgesics versus placebo infusion plus standard analgesics will be performed on patients (age 18 or older) diagnosed with two or more traumatic rib fractures ,from blunt thoracic trauma, requiring hospital admission at Victoria Hospital. The primary outcome is mean pain score, as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) when the patient is at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes are protocol adherence, patient satisfaction as measured on the VAS, incidence of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, mortality, incidence of lidocaine toxicity, treatment regimens (use of additional non-opioid analgesics) and total morphine equivalents used (including breakthrough doses). This trial will serve to quantify the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for patients with traumatic rib fractures. Successful completion of a single centre trial will inform the development of a multi-centre trial powered to demonstrate a reduction in respiratory failure in the trauma population.
Patients with ipsilateral multiple rib fractures will be randomized to receive either a single-shot ultrasound-guided serratus plane block, or a continuous serratus plane block within 24h from the chest trauma. Primary outcome is the difference in forced respiratory volume (FEV1) at 72h.
Early rule-in or rule-out of myocardial infarction (MI) is essential in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with chest pain. Recently, the European Society of Cardiology has suggested an accelerated 0h/1h algorithm to rule-in or rule-out MI as a valid alternative to the standard 0h/3h approach. So far, the 0h/1h algorithm has only been validated for certain high-sensitive Troponin assays. Moreover, it is unknown if MI can be ruled-out by measuring hs-cTn already at 30 minutes (0h/30m) after presentation to the Emergency Department. This prospective cohort study aims to investigate, if a high-sensitive Troponin assay can rule-in or rule-out MI, when using a 0h/30m and a 0h/1h algorithm. Serial blood samples will be drawn from each patient and used for biomarker analysis. In addition, patients will be asked to complete a detailed questionnaire on chest pain characteristics.
Validation of modified HEART score as a rule-out criterion for MACE at 6 weeks: a 2 centre prospective observational cohort with a direct comparison to TIMI, GRACE and high sensitive troponin T at limits of detection Detailed description: The HEART score, as defined previously by Backus et al1, is a risk score specifically developed for acute chest pain/ suspected acute coronary syndrome. The conventional scoring system for the troponin component of HEART is as follows: Troponin <99th percentile =0 (in the case of Hstn T [Roche} 14ng/l, 99th percentile up to X3 URL (99th percentile)= 1 (HSTN T =14-42ng/L, >x3 URN =2 (HSTN T >42ng/l). We have previously defined that the optimal rule-out strategy for suspected acute coronary syndromes may well be a modified HEART score in a single centre study. This study is to prospectively validate the use of this score in a prospective unselected cohort of patients with possible acute coronary syndrome at 2 large secondary care centres
This is a prospective, exploratory, randomised clinical trial. Patients with diagnosed cancer that are to be treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) will be randomised into standard oncological treatment or a cardiological assessment prior to the 5-FU treatment. The investigators hypothesize that aggressive management of ischemic risk factors in asymptomatic patients will reduce the number of hospitalisations and investigations for acute coronary syndrome during and after 5-FU treatment and that patients with high coronary artery calcium scores are more likely to experience chest pain during the treatment with 5-FU.
Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) is a condition of recurring chest pain or discomfort that occurs when a part of the heart is not receiving sufficient blood flow. It is a major public health concern internationally and in Singapore, the leading cause of death from cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has the ability to assess heart structures, scarring or lack of blood supply to the heart muscle with great accuracy and without any radiation involved. A CMR-compatible cycle ergometer can offer a safe and low cost stress equipment to assess heart function and motion abnormalities, and restrictions of the blood supply to the heart tissues due to partial or complete blockages of the blood vessels. This study aims 1. to develop an exercise-CMR stress protocol by testing its feasibility and robustness in assessing changes in cardiac volumes and function due to physical exertion in healthy individuals and 2. to assess the accuracy of the multiparametric stress-CMR as a diagnostic tool for ischemic-causing coronary artery disease (CAD) with coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a reference. 3. to measure the overall economic impact of ischaemic heart disease by estimating the direct and indirect medical costs for each participant. The current sample costs will be extrapolated to estimate the annual costs of treating and managing ischaemic heart disease in the local population. 4. to evaluate the effects of coronary microvascular dysfunction on coronary flow and regulation, physiological response and cardiac sympathetic signaling in patients with chest pain.