View clinical trials related to Chemotherapy.
Filter by:The purpose of this single-arm phase II trial is to determine whether nicotinamide riboside (NIAGEN®) prevents the progression of peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients receiving infusions of paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer or recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian, endometrial, peritoneal, fallopian tube cancer or metastatic head and neck cancer.
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)-numbness, burning and stunning pain distributed in hands and feet-is a major challenge among cancer patients. Even after completion of chemotherapy, CIPN persists among ~30-40% of cancer patients, which can negatively impact quality of life. The only drug (duloxetine) better than placebo in a randomized control trial improved pain intensity by 0.72 points on a scale of 0-10, which cannot manage CIPN effectively. A better pain management strategy clearly needs to be developed. The investigators propose to test auricular point acupressure (APA), a non-invasive, easily administered, patient-controlled, and non-pharmacological strategy, to provide rapid, safe, and effective pain relief so that cancer patients can self-manage their CIPN. APA involves an acupuncture-like stimulation of the ear without needles. With APA, small seeds are taped to specific ear points. The patient is taught to apply pressure to the seeds, with the thumb and index finger, three times a day (morning, noon, and evening) for three minutes each session to achieve pain relief. The investigators have developed a detailed APA protocol to teach health-care providers without experience in acupuncture and traditional Chinese Medicine that investigators can learn about APA in brief educational seminars as a treatment including the systematic identification of ear points (called auricular diagnosis). The investigators teach methods that enable patients to continue using APA to self-manage their pain. However APA is not available in current U.S. health care setting yet. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and fMRI in acupuncture have provided new objective methods for measuring pain. QST provides an evaluation of peripheral and central mechanisms of pain by quantifying stimulus-evoked negative and positive sensory phenomena to evaluate a participant's perception of threshold values regarding pain generated through touch (A beta fibers), warmth (C fibers), cold (A delta fibers), and heat (C fibers). Studies have demonstrated changes in heat, pressure, and mechanical pain thresholds immediately following acupuncture; however no study in APA yet. Brain imaging studies in acupuncture indicate that acupuncture can restore normal functional connectivity related to pain reduction. In conjunction with the investigators pilot data demonstrating that APA impacts neural-immune signaling in patients with chronic low back pain, the investigators hypothesize that APA may likewise induce pain relief through the stimulation of A beta fibers and/or C fibers to increase the pain threshold, endogenous opioid binding (releasing inflammatory cytokines), and alter brain networks of central processing in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis to achieve analgesia. The investigators plan to study the mechanisms underpinning pain sensitivity and pain processing due to APA on CIPN. Along with the clinical and subjective CIPN outcomes, objective outcomes will include physiological change in pain sensory thresholds (measured by quantitative sensory testing), brain change associated with pain processing (measured by fMRI), and neuro-transmitters (measured by inflammatory cytokines).
This is a prospective, single arm, single center study evaluating the use of a 4-gene panel to predict the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced abnormal thermal threshold in endometrial and ovarian cancer patients receiving post-operative chemotherapy with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, and stage III colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled during 2017 July~ 2019 June. Blood sample will be collected before chemotherapy to analyze the genetic variants of TRPV1, TRPM2, TRPA1 and ORAI1. All patients will receive neurologic examination (Quantitative Sensory Test, QST) and complete the questionnaires for quality of life (EQ5D & CIPN20). The primary endpoint of this study is to test if the genetic variant of TRPV1, TRPM2, TRPA1, and ORAI1 is a predictive biomarker for the chemotherapy-induced abnormal thermal sensation in cancer patients.
This study evaluates a simple one day prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting for patients who are getting carboplatin based chemotherapy. In addition to standard oral Dexamethasone and oral Ondansetron, participants will be given a third neurokinin 1 (NK1) antagonist agent, either a single dose of oral Aprepitant or intravenous (IV) Fosaprepitant (they have been shown to be equally effective) to improve prevention of nausea and vomiting. No medications need to be taken beyond day 1.
Prevention and control of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) are most important in treatment of cancer patients. CINV is one of the most distressing severe side effects of cancer treatment and can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. The chemotherapy agents that cause the worst degree of nausea and vomiting are categorized into two groups: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) and highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Nausea and vomiting that occurs within the first day of the administration of chemotherapy agents is considered acute CINV, while nausea and vomiting following 24 hours of the administration of chemotherapy agents is considered delayed CINV. Refractory CINV occurs when patients develop CINV during subsequent cycles of chemotherapy when drugs preventing vomiting and nausea (antiemetic prophylaxis) has not been successful in controlling CINV in earlier cycles. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Akynzeo in the treatment of refractory CINV
The primary objective of this study is to determine the anti-tumor activity, as measured by overall response rate (ORR) of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy resistant CRC and positivity for MSI-like molecular signature. This is an international, open-label single arm (non-randomized), one-stage phase II trial.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant (MK-0517) plus ondansetron versus ondansetron alone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in pediatric participants scheduled to receive chemotherapeutic agent(s) associated with moderate or high risk of causing emesis (vomiting), or chemotherapy agent(s) not previously tolerated due to vomiting. The primary hypothesis is that a single dose of fosaprepitant in combination with ondansetron provides superior control of CINV compared to ondansetron alone as measured by the percentage of participants with a Complete Response (no vomiting, no retching, and no use of rescue medications) in the delayed phase (>24 to 120 hours) following initiation of emetogneic chemotherapy in Cycle 1.
The aim of this study is to assess if dextromethorphan administered during 4 weeks induces a decrease of pain intensity in breast cancer patients suffering from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy compared to placebo group.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of intravenous fosaprepitant therapy to reduce nausea and vomiting during the treatment of high dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) therapy for metastatic melanoma or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Fosaprepitant is an intravenous (IV) medication that is FDA- approved for use in adults for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy. Fosaprepitant works by blocking the neurokinin-1 receptor, which is a receptor in the brain that is known to cause nausea and vomiting. Past studies estimate that up to 70% of patients undergoing treatment with HD IL-2 will have nausea and/or vomiting. While fosaprepitant has been used in clinical practice to treat nausea and vomiting during HD IL-2, there have not been any studies done to see how well it works. All patients will receive treatment (IV fosaprepitant) during the study during either the first or second hospital admission for HD IL-2. On the admission that the subject is not receiving IV fosaprepitant, the subject will receive placebo (a medicine that looks like fosaprepitant, but is not active). The study is double-blinded, which means neither the subject, nor the study doctor will know to which group you have been assigned to that admission (IV fosaprepitant or placebo). This study design was chosen to limit the potential for bias, which means the trial was designed to try to ensure that unknown factors do not affect trial results. When patients start the study, patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: those who receive treatment (IV fosaprepitant) first and those who receive placebo first. During the first admission, subjects will be given the IV fosaprepitant or IV placebo during admission. During the second admission, subjects will 'crossover' and receive the other treatment that they did not receive during the first admission. Improvement in nausea and vomiting will be assessed by counting the number of nausea and vomiting episodes, recording if the subject needs additional medication for nausea and vomiting, and by using patient questionnaires.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ONO-7746 across multiple doses in patients with solid tumors and chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) scheduled to receive at least two cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy on Day 1 every 21 days at the same dosages and schedule in the study. The secondary objectives are to characterize the PK profiles of ONO-7746 and to explore the pharmacodynamic effect of ONO-7746 on CIT.