View clinical trials related to Cesarean Section.
Filter by:The restless leg syndromes is a common sensorimotor disorder of unknown cause affecting approximately 10% of the population. Different literature had different views on the association between neuraxial anesthesia and the occurrence of restless leg syndrome. Some reported that spinal anesthesia induced postoperative restless leg syndrome, but other studies showed that spinal and general anesthesia all two did not cause restless leg syndrome. A potential difference amongst these studies is that a big difference exists in surgical types. The investigators proposed that different types of surgery performed undergoing various anesthesia, and that there is a big difference in original pathophysiological condition. Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that pregnant women who have special physical states would have had an association between neuraxial anesthesia and restless leg syndrome in such patients who received selective cesarean section undergoing spinal or epidural anesthesia.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rates of maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity in gravid patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Specifically, the investigators are examining whether the timing of antibiotic administration has any effect on rates of maternal and neonatal infections, neonatal sepsis work-up and length of hospital stay.
A prospective, randomized, double blind study designed to investigate analgesic efficacy of wound infusion using diclofenac or ropivacaine following Cesarean section performed via a Pfannenstiel incision.
The planned study will be conducted in a prospective, randomized, double blind placebo controlled manner. Two "anti-traumatic" Homeopathic remedies (Arnica montana and Staphysagria) will be used. The selection of these remedies was based on a previous trial that showed a statistical difference in Hemoglobin levels favoring pregnant women treated with these drugs following delivery. The proposed study will focus on the post-operative recovery of women undergoing Cesarean section. According to Homeopathic principles, these two remedies are believed to improve the "vital force", and will therefore improve convalescence following surgery in the study group. The study will include 90 women between the ages of 18 and 50 years who are scheduled for elective Cesarean Section. Exclusion criteria are: obesity (above 100kg), malignancy, psychiatric illness, diabetes and multipara pregnancies. Participants will be inducted following a detailed explanation by an MD and signing of an informed consent form, and then subdivided randomly into three groups numbering 30 in each: Two groups will be treated with homeopathic drugs of varied doses, and the third will get a placebo remedy which is indistinguishable from the other drugs. Outcome measures will include: 1. Blood loss - as estimated by a reduction in serum Hemoglobin levels. 2. Pain -to be evaluated by a numerical rating score (NRS) 3. Analgesic use 4. Length of post-operative stay and complications. 5. Quality of life outcomes - to be assessed using the MOS SF-36 questionnaire at one and four weeks following surgery. Although not expected, adverse events will be monitored. If, as we anticipate, the homeopathic treatment proves to be both safe and effective in shortening the duration of post-operative healing, this will have significant implications, with respect to both healthcare costs and patient suffering. It will also open the door for further research in the field of trauma medicine, as well as other stress-related illness.
Can epidural nalbuphine reduce incidence or severity of epidural morphine induced pruritus in patient undergoing cesarean section?
The purpose of this study will be to assess whether forced air warming decreases the rate of surgical site infections following cesarean section.
Pregnancy promotes respiratory system's restrictive component. This study observes the generation of atelectasis during labor.
A multicenter, randomized, controlled, single blinded study to evaluate the effectiveness of Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier in reducing adhesion formation in cesarean deliveries. Primary outcome will be measurement of the extent and severity of adhesions at the time of subsequent cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes will include measures of safety, operative times (ex., incision-delivery; total operative time).
There is no difference between extra-abdominal or in situ suture of the uterus in cesarean section.
Women who have a cesarean delivery have a surgical incision on their abdomen (belly). The usual way to close this opening is with metal surgical staples. In many other types of surgery, surgical incisions are closed with a super-glue called Dermabond. The researchers at the University of Massachusetts believe Dermabond may be a safe alternative to using staples at the time of a cesarean delivery, but this has not been studied. Women who choose to participate will be randomly assigned to have the cesarean delivery skin incision closed with staples or Dermabond. The researchers will survey the patients to see how they felt about the experience and the appearance of their scar. The researchers will survey physicians performing the surgery to see how easy Dermabond was to use. The researchers will ask physicians to evaluate the appearance of the incision after a 6-week recovery period and will analyze complications (such as bruising, infection, or separation of the wound) in the two groups.