Cataract Clinical Trial
— Z8_CCIOfficial title:
A Single Center, Randomized Control Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Femto-laser Created Clear Corneal Incisions With Manually Created Clear Corneal Incisions During Cataract Surgery
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis, that in terms of Surgically Induced corneal Astigmatism (SIA), Higher-order Aberrations (HOA), and wound geometry the femtosecond clear corneal incisions (CCIs) created during cataract surgery are not inferior when compared to manual CCIs. The potential risks associated with application of the femtosecond laser in this study are no greater or in most cases less than those associated with the standard manual cataract surgical procedure, and the potential benefits (such as precision and reproducibility) are greater than with the standard manual cataract surgery. Therefore, the risk-to-benefit ratio is very low, such that the potential benefits for a subject participating in this study exceed the potential risks
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 94 |
Est. completion date | December 30, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | November 30, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Cataract surgery planned - Accurate baseline biometric measurements and assessed medical status - Subject able to cooperate with the docking system of the laser - Full pupil dilatation Exclusion Criteria: - Glaucoma - Pseudoexfoliation - Small pupils - Previous corneal surgery - Other ophthalmological diseases - Corneal scars - Pterygium |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Switzerland | Augenklinik ORASIS AG | Reinach AG | Aargau |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG |
Switzerland,
Abell RG, Kerr NM, Vote BJ. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;41(5):455-62. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12025. Epub 2012 Dec 10. — View Citation
Baig NB, Cheng GP, Lam JK, Jhanji V, Chong KK, Woo VC, Tham CC. Intraocular pressure profiles during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1784-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.026. Epub 2014 Sep 24. — View Citation
Brian G, Taylor H. Cataract blindness--challenges for the 21st century. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):249-56. Epub 2003 Jul 7. Review. — View Citation
Chang JS, Chen IN, Chan WM, Ng JC, Chan VK, Law AK. Initial evaluation of a femtosecond laser system in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jan;40(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.045. Epub 2013 Nov 22. — View Citation
Ferreira TB, Ribeiro FJ, Pinheiro J, Ribeiro P, O'Neill JG. Comparison of Surgically Induced Astigmatism and Morphologic Features Resulting From Femtosecond Laser and Manual Clear Corneal Incisions for Cataract Surgery. J Refract Surg. 2018 May 1;34(5):322-329. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180301-01. — View Citation
Friedman NJ, Palanker DV, Schuele G, Andersen D, Marcellino G, Seibel BS, Batlle J, Feliz R, Talamo JH, Blumenkranz MS, Culbertson WW. Femtosecond laser capsulotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1189-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.022. Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Sep;37(9):1742. — View Citation
Grewal DS, Basti S. Comparison of morphologic features of clear corneal incisions created with a femtosecond laser or a keratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;40(4):521-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.028. Epub 2014 Feb 22. — View Citation
He L, Sheehy K, Culbertson W. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;22(1):43-52. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283414f76. Review. — View Citation
Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):600-612. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30544-5. Epub 2017 Feb 25. Review. — View Citation
Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;25(12):1053-60. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091117-04. — View Citation
Nagy ZZ, Kránitz K, Takacs AI, Miháltz K, Kovács I, Knorz MC. Comparison of intraocular lens decentration parameters after femtosecond and manual capsulotomies. J Refract Surg. 2011 Aug;27(8):564-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110607-01. Epub 2011 Jun 20. — View Citation
Olson RJ, Braga-Mele R, Chen SH, Miller KM, Pineda R 2nd, Tweeten JP, Musch DC. Cataract in the Adult Eye Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2017 Feb;124(2):P1-P119. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Review. — View Citation
Pajic B, Vastardis I, Gatzioufas Z, Pajic-Eggspuehler B. First experience with the new high-frequency femtosecond laser system (LDV Z8) for cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 8;8:2485-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S72983. eCollection 2014. — View Citation
Palanker DV, Blumenkranz MS, Andersen D, Wiltberger M, Marcellino G, Gooding P, Angeley D, Schuele G, Woodley B, Simoneau M, Friedman NJ, Seibel B, Batlle J, Feliz R, Talamo J, Culbertson W. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with integrated optical coherence tomography. Sci Transl Med. 2010 Nov 17;2(58):58ra85. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001305. — View Citation
Reddy KP, Kandulla J, Auffarth GU. Effectiveness and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted lens fragmentation and anterior capsulotomy versus the manual technique in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.035. — View Citation
Trikha S, Turnbull AM, Morris RJ, Anderson DF, Hossain P. The journey to femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: new beginnings or a false dawn? Eye (Lond). 2013 Apr;27(4):461-73. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.293. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change from baseline (pre-operative) Surgically Induced corneal Astigmatism (SIA) measured by visual acuity (LogMAR) | Baseline = Pre-operative, Follow-up = 12 days, 4 weeks and 6 weeks after surgery | ||
Secondary | Change from baseline (pre-operative) Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measured by the Shack-Hartmann aberrometry method | Baseline = Pre-operative, Follow-up = 12 days, 4 weeks and 6 weeks after surgery | ||
Secondary | Central corneal thickness (CCT) | Baseline = Pre-operative, Follow-up = 1 day, 12 days, 4 weeks and 6 weeks after surgery | ||
Secondary | Endothelial cell density (ECD) | Baseline = Pre-operative, Follow-up = 1 day, 12 days, 4 weeks and 6 weeks after surgery | ||
Secondary | Effective Phacoemulsification Time (EPT) | Baseline = Treatment day | ||
Secondary | Ultrasound total time (US) | Baseline = Treatment day | ||
Secondary | Achieved CCI architecture | Presence of Descemet membrane detachment, posterior and anterior wound gape, if present size) will be analyzed on OCT images | Baseline = Treatment day | |
Secondary | Intra- and post-operative CCI related complications rate | Baseline = Treatment day, Follow-up = 1 day, 12 days, 4 weeks and 6 weeks after surgery | ||
Secondary | FEMTO LDV Z8 OCT auto - detection accuracy | Analyzed on intra-operative Z8 OCT images | Baseline = Treatment day |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04685538 -
Chloroprocaine 3% Gel Eye Drop as Topical Anestheticsin Phacoemulsification.
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06060041 -
IC-8 Apthera IOL New Enrollment Post Approval Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05518539 -
Evaluation of Quality of Vision and Visual Outcomes With Bilateral Implantation of the Clareon PanOptix Intraocular Lens
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05271942 -
Tilt and Tumble vs Divide and Conquer - a Unique Comparison of the Two Cataract Surgery Methods
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04778501 -
PMCF Study on Monofocal Toric IOL (PODEYE TORIC) in Asia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05062564 -
Efficacy of LipiFlow in Patients Affected by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Reducing Post-cataract Surgery Dry Eye
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03751033 -
Influence of DisCoVisc Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device (OVD) on Intraoperative Aberrometry Readings
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02529488 -
Investigation of AcrySof® IQ PanOptix™ Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens (IOL) Model TFNT00
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04539548 -
A Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Dextenza® for the Treatment of Ocular Pain and Inflammation Following Surgery for Pediatric Cataract
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03740659 -
Evaluation Of Aqueous Humor Of Levofloxacin-Dexamethasone Eye Drops And Of Its Components In Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03494257 -
Effect of Fixed Brinzolamide-brimonidine Combination on Intraocular Pressure After Phacoemulsification
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05119127 -
Rotational Stability of Acrysof IQ Vivity Extended Vision Toric IOL and Refractive Visual Outcome.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04271709 -
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03713268 -
Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery II
|
||
Completed |
NCT03739528 -
Levo-Dexa vs. Tobra+Dexa for Prevention and Treatment of Inflammation and Prevention of Infection in Cataract Surgery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02888210 -
A Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of MD-15 Intraocular Lens in Patients With Aphakic Eye After Cataract Surgery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03356847 -
Evaluation of the Rotational Stability of the Monofocal SISA Implant Following Cataract Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04332640 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Next Generation Phaco System
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03638726 -
Subconjunctival Atropine and Intracameral Epinephrine for Pupil Dilation in Phacoemulsification
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03050697 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the HARMONI® Toric Lens
|
N/A |