View clinical trials related to Carer Stress Syndrome.
Filter by:How do varying levels of participation in selecting self-management interventions (ranging from no input into the selection to selection based on need or preference) affect health risks and physical and mental health over time in family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's and other dementia disorders? Caregivers will be randomized to 1) information on diversional activities (attention control); 2) self-management intervention based on need (SM-need); or 3) self-management intervention of their preference (SM-preference).
Family caregivers (CG) of persons with dementia are vulnerable to disproportionate physical, mental and social adverse health consequences . The Reitman Centre CARERS program is an innovative, group psychotherapeutic skills-training intervention. Study objective: to determine the effectiveness of the Reitman Centre CARERS program on key outcomes in family CGs of people with dementia. Study sample: Family CGs of people with dementia (n=264) referred to Reitman Center and the partner sites and wait-list control group (n=83) who received regular care. Method: quasi-experimental, non-randomized, multiple group trial; participants were evaluated before and after completion of the 8-week CARERS program in comparison.
How do different health self-management interventions (resourcefulness training or biofeedback training) compare to usual care (dementia education) in affecting the health risks, and physical and mental health, of family caregivers of people with dementia? And, how do those health outcomes compare with similar measures for family caregivers of people with bipolar disorder? This one-year supplement study will exam these two aims as part of a larger four-year parent grant (NCT03023332). Caregivers enrolled in the study will be randomized to one of the three self-management interventions, with two data collections time points pre- and post-intervention.
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a computer assisted care management system to identify and reduce unmet needs for and to improve quality of life of informal caregivers of people with dementia.
Although multisensory and cognitive stimulation therapy was shown as an effective intervention in improving cognition and behavioral symptoms of people with dementia (PWD), it is not commonly found as an element in the previous dyadic interventions. It was believed that the involvement of the family caregivers in multisensory and cognitive stimulation therapy could produce additional benefits to both PWD and caregivers by enhancing their interactions. Therefore, we will conduct a pilot study which aims to explore the feasibility and the effects of a home based dyadic multisensory and cognitive stimulation (MCS) program for the PWD and their family caregivers followed by a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In the RCT, the intervention group will attend the home-based dyadic MCS group, while the control group will receive the usual care. The outcomes measurements of caregivers (positive caregiving experience, perceived stress, caregiver burden, and quality of life) and PWD (cognitive function and behavioral symptoms) will be assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention, and 3 month-follow up. To understand the therapeutic components and identify the strengths, limitations and difficulties of the home based dyadic MCS program, process evaluation will be conducted through semi-structured focus group interviews with 15 participants from the MCS group. It is hypothesized that the MCS group will have a significant improvement on positive caregiving experience, perceived stress, caregiver burden, and quality of life of caregivers and cognitive function and behavioral symptoms of PWD.
Caring for people with dementia (PWD) poses many challenges which may cause high levels of caregiver stress. This study aims to investigate the effects of a modified Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for stress reduction in the family caregivers of PWD. A prospective, single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 76 family caregivers of PWD will be recruited and randomized to either the MBCT or the control groups.The primary outcomes (stress) and secondary outcomes (anxiety, depression, burden, quality of life and resilience) will be measured at immediate post-intervention (T1) and at 3 months follow up (T2) which will be compared with the baseline (T0). Mixed repeated measure MANOVA will be performed to assess the effects of time, group, and time-group interaction on all outcome measurements.To understand the therapeutic components and identify the strengths, limitations, and difficulties of the MBCT program, process evaluation will be conducted through focus group interviews with 15 participants from the MBI group. It is hypothesized that the MBCT group will have a significantly greater reduction of stress (primary outcome) and improvement in the secondary outcomes, namely depression, anxiety, and burden, at T1 and/or T2 than the control group.
This is a feasibility study to evaluate whether it is possible to conduct a larger study to evaluate whether providing psychological support to carers of people with MS is effective in reducing carer strain. Whilst not all carers experience distress as a result of their caring duties, some do. This study is testing the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in a self-help format. Participants will learn about and use ACT by reading a book provided to them by the study. One group will receive the ACT book, another will receive the same book alongside weekly telephone support to use the book, and a third group will act as a control group and therefore will not have extra support. Participants are allocated to the groups based on chance (a computer will decide group allocation). Participants will complete questionnaires before group allocation, and then again 3 months after they were allocated to a group, and one final time 6 months after group allocation. Those who receive the self-help book will get sent chapters each week for 8 weeks. The groups will be compared on scores from the questionnaires and complete feedback interviews with a subgroup of those who receive the book, to gain feedback about their experiences of the study.