View clinical trials related to Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic.
Filter by:In this study, the investigators evaluated the association between various measures of adiposity [BMI and waist circumference (WC)] and clinical outcomes in Asian patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, using a nationwide population based cohort.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the rhythm control effect in hypertrophic non-obstructive patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by either concomitant catheter endocardial and thoracoscopic epicardial ablation or catheter ablation alone. The study aims to see if concomitant hybrid ablation can more effectively achieve rhythm control effect than catheter ablation alone in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mavacamten compared with placebo in participants with symptomatic non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM).
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited monogenic heart disease. There is an abnormal increase in myocardial mass in this disorder that leads to a state of cardiac sympathetic hypertonia, which is involved in disease progression, development of arrhythmias and heart failure. Cardiac sympathetic hyperactivity may constitute a new therapeutic target in HCM patients who persist symptomatic despite conventional treatment. The hypothesis of this project is that renal denervation (a minimally invasive percutaneous interventional therapy with proven efficacy in resistant arterial hypertension) reduces cardiac sympathetic activity in HCM. The SNYPER pilot study is a non-randomized clinical trial with medical devices (proof of concept), in which a renal denervation procedure will be performed in 20 patients with genetically confirmed sarcomeric HCM, severe left ventricular hypertrophy and persistent symptoms. The impact of denervation in reducing the 123I-meta iodo benzyl guanidine (MIBG) washout rate quantified by isotopic tracing (planar imaging and SPECT) at 6 months is established as a primary efficacy objective, and the proportion of renal denervation-related complications as a safety objective. The most relevant secondary endpoints are the outcomes of renal denervation on left ventricular mass (echocardiogram), diastolic function, maximum oxygen consumption (ergospirometer), ventricular arrhythmia burden (Holter), blood pressure (ABPM), N-terminal (NT) Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and quality of life (KCCQ questionnaire). The results of this study may open the development of a new, technically simple and easily accessible therapeutic line for the treatment of HCM.
Aim: to compare the treatment effects of Bisoprolol (beta 1 receptor specific beta blocker (BB)) and Verapamil (cardio-specific calcium channel blockers (CCB)) in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall and a hypercontracted state of the sarcomeres. This narrows the left ventricular cavity, but though the left ejection fraction is increased the stroke volume and the cardiac output cannot be fully compensated. The disease manifestations can be mild or develop into severe functional limitations and devastating complications at early age. Dyspnea, chest pain, palpitations and syncope are the most common symptoms, and patients are at risk of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac deaths may precede heart failure symptoms. Patients with symptomatic HCM are treated initially with beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. However, there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of this guideline-recommended treatment in HCM. Methods: The study is a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Patients are randomized in to three 35-days treatment periods with Bisoprolol, Verapamil and Placebo. Each treatment period includes a 7-days up titration period, a 21-days target dose period and a 7-days down titration period. Between treatment periods 45 days treatment pause is allowed. End point will be evaluated at day 21 (- 4 days). Patients will be evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise test, echocardiography, 7 day Holter-monitoring, biomarkers and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). A subgroup of patients will also be evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Hypotheses: Three separate phases each with one primary effect parameters will be analyzed between treatment with Bisoprolol and Verapamil: Phase 1: The maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is different (ΔVO2 max ≥1 ml/kg/min) between treatments in non-obstructive HCM patients Phase 2: The left ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVvol) is different (ΔLVvol ≥3 ml) between treatments in non-obstructive HCM patients. Phase 3: The incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is different (Hazard ratio ≥ 0.5) between treatments in non-obstructive HCM patients. The trial will be performed and analyzed in three phases, and each phase may be unblinded and analyzed separately.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of MYK-224 in participants with obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (oHCM)
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important clinical sequela in patients with structural heart disease. VT generally occurs as a result of electrical re-entry in the presence of arrhythmogenic substrate (scar). Scar tissue forms due to an ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) from prior coronary obstructive disease or a non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) from an inflammatory or genetic disease. AADs can reduce VT recurrence, but have significant limitations in treatment of VT. For example, amiodarone has high rates of side effects/toxicities and a finite effective usage before recurrence. ICDs prevent cardiac arrest and sudden death from VT, but do not stop VT occurring. Recurrent VT and ICD therapies decrease QOL, increase hospital visits, mortality, morbidity and risk of death. Improvement in techniques for mapping and ablation of VT have made CA an alternative. Currently, there is limited evidence to guide clinicians either toward AAD therapy or CA in patients with NICM. This data shows significant benefit of CA over medical therapy in terms of VT free survival, survival free of VT storm and VT burden. Observational studies suggest that CA is effective in eliminating VT in NICM patients who have failed AADs, resulting in reduction of VT burden and AAD use over long term follow up. Furthermore, there is limited data on the efficacy of CA in early ICM with VT, or advanced ICM with VT. RCT data is almost exclusively on patients with modest ICM with VT, and this is not representative of the real-world scenario of patients with structural heart disease presenting with VT. Therefore the primary objective is to determine in all patients with structural heart disease and spontaneous or inducible VT, if catheter ablation compared to standard medical therapy with anti-arrhythmic drugs results in a reduction of a composite endpoint of recurrent VT, VT storm and death at a median follow up of 18 months.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a disease of the heart muscle that causes the heart to become thicker and this thickness places children at risk of heart rhythm problems, heart failure and sudden death.To decrease the risk of sudden death, health care providers generally counsel that the patient should stop all intense physical activity. While this recommendation may decrease the risk of sudden death it is unclear what the long term impact of reduced physical activity is on cardiovascular health in children with HCM. Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a disease of the heart and blood vessels and is the cause of heart attacks in adults. There are many risk factors for the development of CV disease including genetics, medical conditions and lifestyle choices. While some studies in adults suggest that patients with HCM are at higher risk of poor cardiovascular health, this has not yet been assessed in children. Although, CV disease is generally thought of to be a disease of adults, there is a lot of information that suggests the development of CV disease starts early in life and therefore by promoting heart healthy lifestyles in children, it is possible that these children will becomes healthier adults. The goal of this project is to assess risk factors for CV disease in a population of children with HCM at the two largest pediatric cardiac programs in Canada. This assessment will be to look at factors we can measure (e.g., weight, cholesterol levels) and patients' and families' perceptions of what it means to be heart healthy. It is hoped that through this project risk factors for heart disease, and poor "heart healthy" lifestyles choices, will be identified in order to develop strategies to decrease these risk factors in patients with HCM. With a better understanding of the families' perceptions of heart healthy behaviours, educational tools and resources for cardiovascular health promotion in patients with HCM can be developed.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) treated in the real-world setting. The registry study also provide a real-world understanding of the current obstructive HCM patient population, treatment patterns, and clinical relevant outcomes for patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM in the US.
To explore the feasibility, safety, health and psychological benefits of a 12-week high intensity exercise programme in a young group of individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This will pave the way for a large-scale randomised study of safety of exercise in HCM, the results of which will strengthen the evidence base for exercise recommendations.