View clinical trials related to Cardiac Complication.
Filter by:This study is a retrospective, observational study that aims to include patients undergoing cardiac surgery. 1. Evaluate the preventive effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on post-cardiac surgery cognitive dysfunction over the past eight years. 2. Utilize the pre-existing preoperative and postoperative 24-hour plasma samples from previous studies to measure the levels of glycocalyx and its related regulatory factors. 3. Assess the clinical correlation between the measured parameters and patient outcomes.
The aim of the project is to identify the prevalence and characteristics of long-term cardiovascular changes in Covid-19 infection.
The goal of this observational study is to collect health data on people who are at high risk of having heart complications and are having a surgery that is not on the heart. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is this study feasible in terms of recruiting enough people to participate in this study? - How often do heart complications happen in people who are at high risk of heart complications and are having a surgery that is not on the heart? Participants will have their usual care and will also be asked to: - Have extra bloodwork done - Complete some surveys - Have two echocardiograms (ultrasounds of the heart) - Continue to follow-up with the research team for one year after their surgery Researchers will compare how often heart complications occur in this high risk population to a future study where participants will receive stem cells before their surgery.
Patient reported outcomes are becoming increasingly recognized as an important metric to determine efficacy of interventions following recovery after cardiac surgery. Quality of Recovery 15 survey is a tool that attempts to measure patients' recovery across several different domains (i.e physical, emotional and social). This tool has been validated extensively in the post operative patient population, but these studies contained only small numbers of cardiac surgery patients. This population faces unique challenges to recovery such as a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital LOS, delirium, significant pain in the first 24-48 hours and post operative arrhythmias. This study aims to validate the QoR 15 in this population exclusively to determine if it is feasible, valid, reliable and responsive in this unique population.
Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a rapidly evolving method of clinical assessment within the intensive care unit (ICU) with training predominantly aimed at physicians. Routine whole-body PoCUS (lungs, heart, abdomen and blood vessels) when conducted by physicians benefits patient care and outcomes including reducing the risk of prolonged ICU stay (>7 days) and mechanical ventilation as well as reducing utilisation of other diagnostic tests. However, physician-only use of PoCUS does not allow for use as a routine assessment method in the ICU due to the low physician to patient ratio and poor ultrasound accreditation rate. Providing other healthcare professionals such as Advanced Critical Care Practitioners (ACCPs), ICU nurses and physiotherapists with PoCUS skills increases the proportion of trained staff to perform routine PoCUS in the ICU. This could aid earlier identification of abnormal pathology, earlier treatment, and prevent patient deterioration. The advancement of handheld PoCUS technology is making ultrasound more portable, cheaper and easier to use. The increased accessibility of PoCUS combined with growing evidence of its diagnostic accuracy compared to other modes of imaging means PoCUS use is gaining traction globally. However, little to no research exists investigating the feasibility of implementing scheduled interprofessional PoCUS in the ICU and its impact on patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a quick and simple whole body ultrasound scan performed by trained ACCPs, ICU nurses, physiotherapists, and doctors at set time points throughout the patients ICU stay. The investigators want to find out the most common barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation and to explore the key clinical outcomes for use in a future definitive RCT.
Patients scheduled for elective surgery will undergo 4 week course of trimodal prehabilitation
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which affects multiple organ system particularly the lung and heart. Indeed, SARS CoV-2 has various cardiac manifestations which are associated with higher mortality and morbidity. Cardiac involvement, based on elevated levels of myocardial enzymes, have been described in 20 to 30% of COVID-19 infection. However, the physiopathological mechanisms of myocardial injury remains unclear. Main hypothesis include inflammation and cytokine storm, hypercoagulability and vascular thrombosis, inflammation or stress leading to coronary plaque rupture (type I myocardial infarction), supply-demand mismatch and hypoxemia resulting in myocardial damage (type II myocardial infarction) ... Two patterns can be identified : ischemic or non-ischemic pattern including myocarditis, stress induced cardiomyopathy, thrombo-embolic disease. However, the consequences of myocardial damage after confirmed COVID-19 infection are unknown at medium to long term prognosis. Data are needed to identify myocardial damage and to guide effective therapies and follow-up (use of ACE inhibitor, beta-blockers, steroids...? ) In this study, the investigators proposed to collect multimodal cardiac imaging including MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and TTE (Transthoracic echocardiogram) in order to identify and characterize cardiac injury as ischemic or non-ischemic pattern, to better assess risk stratification and to guide effective therapies if necessary.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the cardiac status of COVID-19 pneumonia patients during 1 year after discharge
At the end of December of 2019, a series of patients in Wuhan, China were struck with a mysterious respiratory infection. These isolated events have rapidly grown into a deadly, global pandemic. This pandemic is caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which results in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). For individuals infected with COVID-19, approximately 30% of the hospitalized cases are associated with cardiovascular complications. Data are emerging that individuals with pre-exiting conditions (like hypertension, diabetes, cancer, or medical issues related to the immune system) are most susceptible to complications related to COVID-19. Furthermore, individuals of certain racial and ethnic backgrounds (e.g. African American and Hispanic) are at a higher risk of death from COVID-19. Despite these emerging observations, it remains unclear who will develop the cardiovascular complications (acute myocardial injury with evidence of a myocarditis-like picture and cardiogenic shock) and what the long term sequelae of this disease will be for survivors of this infection after hospitalization. Thus, the goals of this project are to better understand the epidemiology of cardiac injury in acutely ill COVID-19 patients through deep cardiac phenotyping and identify the molecular profile of individuals most susceptible to cardiac injury from COVID-19.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study to investigate the efficacy of pemziviptadil (PB1046) by improving the clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at high risk for rapid clinical deterioration, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death. The study will enroll approximately 210 hospitalized COVID-19 patients who require urgent decision-making and treatment at approximately 20 centers in the United States.