View clinical trials related to Carcinoma.
Filter by:The prognosis of liver transplanted (LT) patients with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially those with progression after locoregional treatment or advanced HCC, remains poor. Current treatment modalities involve tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) characterized by a low response rate and often poor tolerability. Encouraging findings from the Imbrave 150 study, demonstrating increased survival rates coupled with favorable treatment tolerance, prompt the investigators to consider the potential of offering the combination of treatment with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab (Atezo-Beva) to patients with LT. No data regarding the safety and efficacy of this new combination are available for patients with LT as they were not included in Imbrave 150. Immunosuppression after LT is low when compared to essentially all other organ recipients, liver recipients are considered with lower immunological risk. However, the use of ICIs has been associated with a risk of hepatic rejection in LT patients. In this study, in order to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR) occurrence, we propose to adopt a standardized immunosuppressive regimen closed to the one used immediately after LT but with lower therapeutic goals for tacrolimus and everolimus to allow immunotherapy treatment to be effective. The better tolerance of liver grafts will probably lead to less risk of rejection with Atezo-Beva than in other organ transplants.
This prospective, single-arm study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human adenovirus type 5 injection combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The recombinant human adenovirus type 5 was administered intratumorally on day 1 and 5 in cycle 1 and cycle 2. Lenvatinib was administered orally once daily started on day 1 of cycle 1 .Tislelizumab was administered intravenously every 3 week started on day 1 of cycle 3. The patient accepted the therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred or meet the end point of the study. The primary end point was ORR assessed by investigator using RECIST v1.1 .
The goal of this observational study is to accurate diagnose the stage of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in order to help physicians to decide the appropriate clinical treatment. The main question it aims to answer is: • To get early accurate diagnosis of the invasion depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by narrow-band imaging endoscopy data. Participants' clinical informations from routine examinations and treatments will be collected, there will be no harm to participants.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lithium-containing mouthwash for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis and dysgeusia in patients undergoing radiotherapy for malignant head and neck tumors.
Patients with ruptured liver cancer and bleeding after surgical resection were included according to the criteria of admission, and the patients were divided into experimental and control groups. the primary efficacy end point was RFS, and the secondary end point was the rate of abdominal implant metastases and OS.To analyze the efficacy of HIPEC.
SBRT, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab have different mechanisms of action and can potentially have synergistic effects when combined. SBRT delivers targeted radiation to the tumor, while atezolizumab enhances the immune response, and bevacizumab inhibits angiogenesis. The combination of SBRT with atezolizumab and bevacizumab will result in improved tumor response rates as compared to atezolizumab and bevacizumab alone in patients with advance unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Up until now, no study has been done that has compared SBRT with atezolizumab, and bevacizumab in unresectable advance hepatocellular carcinoma. With this study, investigator aim to study to compare the efficacy and safety of SBRT combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab alone in the treatment of unresectable advance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
The goal of this observational study is to determine the risk of recurrence in early-stage OCCC (Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma) patients who received postoperative adjuvant treatment. Participants were received platinum-based adjuvant therapy following debulking surgery will be included for the study.
This is a randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ZG005 in combination with Donafenib or Bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Adjuvant Therapy Versus Endoscopic Surgery Alone in Early-stage Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
This phase II trial tests how well ARX788 works in treating patients diagnosed with HER2-low, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic breast cancer. ARX788 is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that is given by infusion (diluted and injected slowly into veins). Antibodies are proteins which are naturally produced by the body's immune system to help fight infections. ARX788 consists of antibodies that have been attached to a toxin that has the potential to kill cancer cells. ARX788 sticks to a protein called human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2), which is found on some breast cancer cells. Giving ARX788 may be safe and effective in treating patients with HER2-low locally advanced unresectable metastatic breast cancer.