View clinical trials related to Carcinoma in Situ.
Filter by:The goal of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the possibility of vacuum-assisted excisional biopsy (VAE) to completely remove the pathology in case of small lesions for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH) and low-intermediate grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS).
This study will construct a longitudinal risk model of VaIN according to the HPVs distribution of cervix and vaginal for those had CIN2+. The study will include three arms to complete the follow-up data for the previous cohort constructed, and prospectively recruit new subjects with the appropriate inclusion/excluding criteria in order to increase sample size of this study.
The purpose of this study is to assess whether APG-157 can reduce the tumor size in participants with the study disease. Another purpose is to find out about the effects of APG-157 on certain tumor markers and oral rinses in participants with the study disease.
Anal cancer can be prevented through detection and treatment of a recognised precancerous lesion, known as anal intra-epithelial neoplasia (AIN), specifically the anal high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (aHSIL) subtype. Assessment of changes in disease burden is an important feature in the clinical evaluation of a treatment. Existing trials in aHSIL have predominantly used disease response outcomes based on histological and cytological changes to measure the effects of treatment. Several limitations to this approach have been identified. Lesion characteristics such as lesion size and number represent potential indicators of disease response to treatment and might overcome some of the limitations. We aim to develop a disease measurement instrument capable of describing disease burden such that it can be used to evaluate disease response to treatment in addition to histological and cytological based measurements further strengthening the quality of disease response outcomes. The disease measurement instrument will be developed over 4 stages: 1. A meeting of AIN experts to determine a longlist of lesion measurement items capable of capturing disease burden; 2. A series of disease assessments will be undertaken in participants known to have aHSIL to assess disease burden using the measurement items identified in stage 1; 3. Data analysis to determine the best performing measurement items and comprise a disease measurement instrument; 4. Pilot-testing of the proposed disease measurement instrument. Two trained disease assessors (experienced clinicians familiar with the assessment of anal intraepithelial lesions) will assess disease burden per participant. Disease burden will also be captured photographically. We will undertake disease assessments on 20-30 participants. By analysing the results of the clinician assessments and digital analysis of the photographic representation of disease burden, we will be able to determine the most acceptable, feasible, reliable and reproducible ways of measuring disease burden and use these to inform a disease measurement instrument.
This is a study involving exome sequencing and immune profiling of matched tissue and blood samples from patients with both high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous cell carcinoma. This is a collaborative project between Imperial College London and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), investigating the genetic predeterminants for the progression of anal HSIL to SCC as well as the immunogenetic profile of these conditions will be beneficial for risk stratification (with respect to identifying those individuals with anal HSIL most likely to progress to invasive disease), the identification of potential new drug targets and will add to our understanding of how the tumour microenvironment may influence treatment response and disease recurrence of both anal HSIL and SCC.
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involving the analysis of Cancer Registry Data. As part of this study, cancer registration data collated by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS; the national cancer registry in England), via NHS Digital data access request service (DARS), will be analysed on all female patients aged between 25-90+ years in England with a registered diagnosis of anal and vaginal and/or vulvar and/or cervical cancer and/or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) between 2001 and 2019. For these patients information on age at diagnosis, ethnicity, deprivation, performance status, stage of the cancer at diagnosis, the date of each diagnosis, the treatment received for the diagnosis and the route to diagnosis, will be analysed. Additionally, the total number of women/year (between 1995 and 2019), in England, aged between 25-90+ years with a diagnosis of anal, vulvar, vaginal and cervical cancer as well as their respective HSILs will be requested. Together this data will be used to establish the incidence of anal cancer and HSIL in women with genital cancers and/or HSILs, the progression timelines between the different pathologies, as well as identify relevant sociodemographic risk factors in this patient group.
Our study aims to assess the relationship between the Seismofit® derived VO2 peak estimate and CPET-measured VO2 peak in patients who are having CPET as part of their preoperative workup. Our aim is to establish whether Seismofit® can be considered a cheaper, less resource intensive and better tolerated alternative to the CPET, or whether it might be useful as a screening tool to efficiently identify patients with exercise intolerance who may benefit from further characterisation by CPET.
This study evaluates whether adding a polygenic risk score evaluation to standard breast cancer risk assessment tools helps African American and Hispanic women make more informed decisions about accepting additional breast cancer screening and prevention strategies. Traditional breast cancer risk assessments rely mostly on the presence of standard clinical risk factors including family history, reproductive history, and mammographic breast density. This information can be combined with validated risk estimation models to provide a measure of a patient's 10 year and lifetime risk for breast cancer. A polygenic risk score helps to estimate breast cancer risk in a more individualized way by evaluating a patient's genetics. Adding a polygenic risk score evaluation to traditional screening techniques may help minority women make more informed decisions about screening and prevention strategies for breast cancer.
This is a multicentre open labelled phase I trial evaluating the safety and preliminary efficacy of local decitabine treatment of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) grade 2/3. The main purpose and primary objective of the study is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of VTD-101 ointment for the topical treatment of HPV-induced VIN grade 2/3. The RP2D is defined as the dose that is safe, tolerable and effective. Corresponding endpoints are the rate of patients experiencing at least one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and the rate of patients with clinical complete or partial response (cCR/cPR) according to adapted RECIST criteria. Secondary objectives are to further characterize the efficacy of topical treatment with VTD-101 ointment, to further evaluate the safety and tolerability of topical treatment with VTD-101 ointment, and to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with VTD-101 ointment.
Screening and advances in breast imaging led to a continuous increase of Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis. Whole breast radiotherapy was reported to be effective in reducing the risk of local recurrence in all analyzed patients and tumor characteristics. In order to de-escalate treatment in low and intermediate DCIS, it is possible to investigate the role of partial breast irradiation (PBI). To date, data from available literature supports the hypothesis that PBI is a safe well tolerated therapy that appears to be equivalent to WBI in terms of efficacy and ultimate breast cosmesis.