View clinical trials related to Carcinoma in Situ.
Filter by:The goal of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the possibility of vacuum-assisted excisional biopsy (VAE) to completely remove the pathology in case of small lesions for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH) and low-intermediate grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS).
This study will construct a longitudinal risk model of VaIN according to the HPVs distribution of cervix and vaginal for those had CIN2+. The study will include three arms to complete the follow-up data for the previous cohort constructed, and prospectively recruit new subjects with the appropriate inclusion/excluding criteria in order to increase sample size of this study.
The purpose of this study is to assess whether APG-157 can reduce the tumor size in participants with the study disease. Another purpose is to find out about the effects of APG-157 on certain tumor markers and oral rinses in participants with the study disease.
This is a study involving exome sequencing and immune profiling of matched tissue and blood samples from patients with both high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous cell carcinoma. This is a collaborative project between Imperial College London and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), investigating the genetic predeterminants for the progression of anal HSIL to SCC as well as the immunogenetic profile of these conditions will be beneficial for risk stratification (with respect to identifying those individuals with anal HSIL most likely to progress to invasive disease), the identification of potential new drug targets and will add to our understanding of how the tumour microenvironment may influence treatment response and disease recurrence of both anal HSIL and SCC.
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involving the analysis of Cancer Registry Data. As part of this study, cancer registration data collated by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS; the national cancer registry in England), via NHS Digital data access request service (DARS), will be analysed on all female patients aged between 25-90+ years in England with a registered diagnosis of anal and vaginal and/or vulvar and/or cervical cancer and/or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) between 2001 and 2019. For these patients information on age at diagnosis, ethnicity, deprivation, performance status, stage of the cancer at diagnosis, the date of each diagnosis, the treatment received for the diagnosis and the route to diagnosis, will be analysed. Additionally, the total number of women/year (between 1995 and 2019), in England, aged between 25-90+ years with a diagnosis of anal, vulvar, vaginal and cervical cancer as well as their respective HSILs will be requested. Together this data will be used to establish the incidence of anal cancer and HSIL in women with genital cancers and/or HSILs, the progression timelines between the different pathologies, as well as identify relevant sociodemographic risk factors in this patient group.
Our study aims to assess the relationship between the Seismofit® derived VO2 peak estimate and CPET-measured VO2 peak in patients who are having CPET as part of their preoperative workup. Our aim is to establish whether Seismofit® can be considered a cheaper, less resource intensive and better tolerated alternative to the CPET, or whether it might be useful as a screening tool to efficiently identify patients with exercise intolerance who may benefit from further characterisation by CPET.
This study evaluates whether adding a polygenic risk score evaluation to standard breast cancer risk assessment tools helps African American and Hispanic women make more informed decisions about accepting additional breast cancer screening and prevention strategies. Traditional breast cancer risk assessments rely mostly on the presence of standard clinical risk factors including family history, reproductive history, and mammographic breast density. This information can be combined with validated risk estimation models to provide a measure of a patient's 10 year and lifetime risk for breast cancer. A polygenic risk score helps to estimate breast cancer risk in a more individualized way by evaluating a patient's genetics. Adding a polygenic risk score evaluation to traditional screening techniques may help minority women make more informed decisions about screening and prevention strategies for breast cancer.
Screening and advances in breast imaging led to a continuous increase of Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis. Whole breast radiotherapy was reported to be effective in reducing the risk of local recurrence in all analyzed patients and tumor characteristics. In order to de-escalate treatment in low and intermediate DCIS, it is possible to investigate the role of partial breast irradiation (PBI). To date, data from available literature supports the hypothesis that PBI is a safe well tolerated therapy that appears to be equivalent to WBI in terms of efficacy and ultimate breast cosmesis.
High-risk precancerous cervical lesions are divided into stage 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2 and 3). CIN 3 represents a direct pre-stage of invasive cancer, has a high rate of progression and a high degree of agreement with the final histological diagnosis. In CIN 2 lesions, the rate of agreement with the final histological diagnosis is lower and the rate of spontaneous regression is higher. Due to the higher rate of regression and possible complications after excisional treatment, conservative active monitoring can be considered in selected young CIN 2 patients. A recent meta-analysis reported a high rate of spontaneous clinical regression of CIN 2, particularly in women under 30 years old. There are currently no prospectively validated prognostic biomarkers to determine which CIN 2 will progress to higher grade and which will regress to lower grade of change. Recent research has studied HPV methylation and microbiome analysis as biomarkers. A number of studies have shown that host cell DNA methylation levels in cervical scrapes increase with underlying cervical disease severity and are highest in cervical cancer. DNA methylation involves the covalent binding of a methyl group to the 5´ position of a cytosine molecule in CpG dinucleotides. Besides global hypomethylation, the overall loss of methylation during carcinogenesis, resulting in chromosomal instability, and the silencing of tumour suppressor genes by local hypermethylation of CpG-rich promoter regions contribute to cancer development. Gene promoter methylation can be easily accessed by sensitive, quantitative methylation-specific PCR providing an objective test outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the methylation rate of two suppressor genes- FAM19A4 and hsa-mir-124 on the rate of CIN 2 regression, persistence or progression in women younger than 36 years (≤35 years old).
This clinical trial assesses if the use of a three-dimensional imaging device called the Clarix Imaging Volumetric Specimen Imager (VSI) can help guide and assist surgeons in identifying and removing all positive margins while in the operating room (intraoperative imaging) for patients with breast cancer and breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast conservation surgery or lumpectomy is a standard of care (routine) procedure that removes the tumor and a rim of surrounding normal tissue (margins) while leaving as much normal breast tissue as possible. A margin that does not contain tumor cells is called a negative margin and tells the surgeon that the primary tumor has been removed. A positive margin contains tumor cells at or near the edge of the tissue removed. As part of standard of care, surgeons take two-dimensional x-ray images of the tissue that has been removed in the operating room to assess if there is any additional tissue that should be shaved (removed) to get a negative margin. After the surgery is over, the tissue is examined once again by a pathologist in a laboratory to determine if there are any small pieces of tumor left in the margin that were not visible during surgery. If residual tumor is detected in the margin, a reoperation may be required to remove additional tissue until the tumor has been completely removed from the margin. Diagnostic procedures, such as intraoperative volumetric specimen imaging may reduce the rate of reoperation of for patients who previously underwent lumpectomy.