View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.
Filter by:This phase 0/1 study evaluates intraarterial administration of gallium Ga 68 gozetotide (68Ga-PSMA) for the detection of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positive liver cancer by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). 68Ga-PSMA is an imaging agent used with PET/CT scans to locate PSMA positive lesions. This study evaluates intraarterial administration of this agent, compared to intravenous administration.
This trial will assess the safety and tolerability of PXS-5505 incorporating first-line combination therapy Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Phase 2 will assess the efficacy of this combination therapy in unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib and nivolumab in people with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
This phase II trial studies the effect of nivolumab and ADI-PEG 20 before surgery in treating patients with liver cancer that can be removed by surgery (resectable). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. ADI-PEG 20 may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the proteins needed for cell growth. Giving nivolumab and ADI-PEG 20 before surgery may help control liver cancer.
Patients with high risk of disease recurrence after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) deserve active intervention. However, there's limited treatment choice for these patients. Anlotinib hydrochloride, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor for both tumor angiogenesis and proliferative signaling in cancer cells, is approved in China for the 3rd line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In the current study, we are to evaluate the safety and effects of adjuvant anlotinib therapy for the patients who underwent curative resection for HCC with high risk of tumor recurrence, which is defined by Shanghai Score (Sun, et al. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017).
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Considering its high mortality and rapid spread, an effective vaccine is urgently needed to control this pandemic. Recently, mass vaccination campaigns using newly approved vaccines, ranging from conventional viral and protein-based vaccines to those that are more cutting edge, including DNA- and mRNA-based vaccines are beginning in many parts of the world. Randomized clinical trials of different vaccines reported efficacies for preventing COVID-19 in the range of 50% to 95%. Although these randomized clinical trials are considered the "gold standard" for evaluating intervention effects, they have notable limitations of sample size and subgroup analysis, restrictive inclusion criteria, and a highly controlled setting that may not be replicated in a mass vaccine rollout. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of different vaccines against COVID-19 under real-world practice conditions.
Subjects with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection, genotype 1 or 4 and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and a complete response to HCC therapy will be randomised to immediate or delayed (6 months) HCV therapy with Elbasvir (MK-8742) and Grazoprevir (MK-5172) [EBR/GZR].
The primary goal of this study is to gather efficacy data concerning overall survival with electromagnetic field when compared to a placebo amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic field device in subjects who have failed or are intolerant to at least two previous systemic therapies
This study is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of HLX10 + HLX04 vs Sorafenibas as the First-line Treatment in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC Eligible subjects in this study will be randomized to Arm A or Arm B at 2:1 ratio as follows: Arm A (treatment group): HLX10 + HLX04 Arm B (control group): sorafenib Randomization is stratified by: region (Asia (excluding Japan) vs. others), HBV infection vs. HCV infection vs. no HBV or HCV infection, portal vein invasion or/and extrahepatic spread (with vs.without), and ECOG (0 vs. 1).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of curative intended irreversible electroporation (IRE) in the treatment of liver tumors neighboring major vessels or bile ducts.