View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.
Filter by:Surgical resection is the primary curative treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a 5-year overall survival rate of 60-80% post-surgery. Therefore, guidelines recommend surgical resection as the first-line choice for early to mid-stage HCC (CNLC stages IA-IIA or BCLC stages A/B) patients with well liver reserve function. However, the high postoperative recurrence rate is the main factor limiting long-term survival in HCC patients, with literature reporting recurrence rates exceeding 70%. Among these, half of the patients experience recurrence within two years post-surgery, imposing a heavy burden on patients' physical and mental health as well as on societal medical resources. Adopting effective treatment to improve surgical curability and reduce postoperative recurrence rates is one of the current research hotspots. Recent studies from the investigators' center indicate that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and immunotherapy can provide definite efficacy for patients with advanced HCC, extending their survival time. Mechanistically, chemotherapy and immunotherapy have synergistic effects: tumor cell necrosis induced by chemotherapy can promote immune activation, while cytokines and neutralizing antibodies secreted by immune cells can enhance the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical study, targeting HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors, to evaluate whether neoadjuvant HAIC combined with a PD-1 monoclonal antibody (Tislelizumab) followed by adjuvant Tislelizumab post-surgery can reduce postoperative recurrence rates in HCC patients. The primary endpoint is the 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate post-surgery, while secondary endpoints include the objective response rate (ORR) of neoadjuvant therapy, the incidence of perioperative complications, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, overall survival (OS) time, pathological complete response (pCR) rate of neoadjuvant therapy, and major pathological response (MPR) of neoadjuvant therapy. The investigators aim to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant HAIC plus PD-1 and adjuvant PD-1 in the perioperative treatment of HCC.
Saffron has recently gained considerable interest for its capacity to interfere with cancer at initiation and promotion stages as well as for cancer treatment. Although saffron and its constituents have been shown to have antitumorigenic and proapoptotic activities in different cancer cell lines. The aim of the current investigation is to identify the anti-cancer potentiality of saffron on hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
This is a Phase 1, open label clinical trial of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
A phase I clinical study of 4th generation chimeric antigen receptor T Cells targeting glypican-3 ( CAR-GPC3 T Cells) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of ctDNA-MRD longitudinal surveillance model and internationally accepted pathological MVI results in predicting recurrence after radical hepatectomy. At the same time, to explore the relationship among the two methods of predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma, postoperative adjuvant therapy and postoperative recurrence, this study further confirmed the effectiveness of ctDNA-MRD longitudinal monitoring model in monitoring postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and guiding treatment.
Nowadays, there are few second-line treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In order to further improve the efficacy of second-line treatment for advanced HCC, we plan to conduct a single-arm, single-center and phase II clinical study to explore the efficacy and safety of the new second-line treatment for advanced HCC. Previous studies had shown that FOLFOX systemic chemotherapy tended to increase the median survival time of patients with advanced HCC, and significantly improved the progression-free survival and tumor response rate. Therefore, FOLFOX systemic chemotherapy has become one of the recommended treatments for advanced HCC in Chinese guidelines. A phase II clinical study had showed that sintilimab combined with fruquintinib was with a promising anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced HCC who had received standard treatment, with a median progression-free survival of 7.4 months and a tumor response rate of 31.6%. Furthermore, there was a synergistic effect among chemotherapy, immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. Our previous phase II study showed that the median progression-free survival was 9.73 months, the median overall survival time was 14.63 months, and the tumor response rate was 43.3% in HCC patients extrahepatic metastasis who received FOLFOX systemic chemotherapy combined with targeted and immunotherapy. The results from our study suggested that the combination therapy had excellent anti-tumor efficacy and safety profile. Therefore. We intend to conduct this clinical study to explore the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX systemic chemotherapy combined with fruquintinib and sintilimab in second-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC after first-line treatment.
In recent years, with the emergence of various new targeted and immunotherapy drugs, drug therapy for advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma has also seen continuous breakthroughs. The effective rate, progression free survival, and overall survival of advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma have all significantly improved. At present, internationally recognized first-line treatments available include atezolizumab+bevacizumab (T+A), lenvatinib, sorafenib, Durvalumab+tremelimumab, etc. However, the effective rate of first-line treatment has not exceeded 50%, and most patients face difficulties such as drug resistance or treatment failure. Second line treatment for Hepatocellular carcinoma still faces many difficulties and challenges. The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of HAIC combined with TQB2868 and Ramucirumab in second-line treatment of advanced HCC patients.
This study is a first-in-human (FIH) Phase 1 study of BGB-B2033 to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of the BGB-B2033 in participants with advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric cancer (GC), extragonadal yolk sac tumors, non-dysgerminomas, or glypican-3 (GPC3)-positive squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study will also identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BGB-B2033 alone and in combination with tislelizumab for subsequent proof-of-concept studies. BGB-B2033 will be administered by intravenous infusion. The Phase 1 study will be conducted in 2 parts: Part A (Monotherapy Dose Escalation and Safety Expansion) and Part B (Combination Dose Escalation and Safety Expansion).
This is a retrospective study that retrospectively included patients with intermediate and advanced HCC beyond up to seven who received first-line treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents combined with/without TACE/HAIC from January 01, 2019 to December 31, 2023 in the Department of Hepatic Oncology and Department of Liver Cancer Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
This study is a prospective, open label, multi-centre phase 2 trial which assesses the efficacy and safety of standard dosing compared to extended dosing interval of nivolumab, atezolizumab or pembrolizumab in advanced/unresectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction/oesphageal adenocarcinomas with PDL1 CPS ≥5%, hepatocellular carcinoma andnon-small cell lung cancer with PDL1 TPS≥50% with no prior treatment. The investigators hypothesize that nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab can be used efficiently at extended dosing intervals, compared to their approved labels with comparable clinical outcome.