Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Optimization of a mHealth Physical Activity Promotion Intervention With Mindful Awareness for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
The purpose of the present study is to utilize Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST)1 to test four social support and mindfulness components (e-coaching, buddy, general mindfulness training, and MVPA-specific mindfulness training) in a 12-week mHealth moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) intervention in a sample of young adult cancer survivors (YACS), to improve quality of life (QOL) and decrease adverse effects and symptom burden. PRIMARY AIM To identify which components from four mHealth components under consideration for inclusion meaningfully contribute to improvements in MVPA at 12 and 24 weeks SECONDARY AIM To examine how changes in MVPA, as a result of Opt2Move components, may influence additional health behaviors and outcomes including: a) symptom burden (i.e. fatigue, depression, anxiety); b) time spent in other activity intensities (i.e. light, sedentary time); and c) sleep duration and quality THIRD AIM To examine potential mediators (i.e. adherence, psychosocial factors such as post-traumatic growth, self-compassion, self-efficacy, and goal setting) and moderators (cancer type, age, gender) of the four intervention components on MVPA.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 304 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 39 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: For YACS - Diagnosis of nonmetastatic cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) within 5 years from the time of screening / study overview session - Age Diagnosis of cancer between 18-39 years at time of diagnosis and at time of screening / study overview session - Three or more months post-completion of primary treatment (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation); may still be undergoing endocrine or hormone therapies - Score of 0 on two of the Exercise Preparticipation Health Screening Questionnaire items or willingness to obtain medical clearance from a primary care physician or oncologist - Self-report engagement in <60 minutes total each week of MVPA at time of screening / study overview session - Ownership of a smartphone that is either an iPhone (version 5 or greater) or an Android (version 5.0 or greater) - Internet access - Fluency in spoken and written English - Willingness, at time of screening / study overview session, to find a Buddy (someone who knows about their cancer and participation in this study and who is willing to participate by supporting them during the 6-month study), if assigned to that condition For "Buddies" - Friend, co-worker, caregiver or family member of a participating YACS - Age 18 years or older - Score of 0 on the Exercise Preparticipation Health Screening Questionnaire or willingness to obtain medical clearance from a primary care physician - Ownership of a smartphone that is either an iPhone (version 5 or greater) or an Android (version 5.0 or greater) - Internet access - Fluency in spoken and written English - Willingness to share their Fitbit data with the study team Exclusion Criteria: - For YACS: Diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer - Absolute contraindications to exercise (i.e., acute myocardial infarction, severe orthopedic conditions), metastatic disease, or planned elective surgery - Currently pregnant or plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months - Plans to move out of the United States in next 18 months - For YACS: Current enrollment in another dietary or physical activity trial - Inability to provide informed consent - Prisoners or other detained individuals |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Wake Forest School of Medicine | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Northwestern University | National Cancer Institute (NCI), Wake Forest University Health Sciences |
United States,
Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jun 6;104(11):815-40. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs207. Epub 2012 May 8. — View Citation
Bélanger LJ, Mummery WK, Clark AM, Courneya KS. Effects of targeted print materials on physical activity and quality of life in young adult cancer survivors during and after treatment: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 2014;3(2):83-91.
Brunet J, Wurz A, Shallwani SM. A scoping review of studies exploring physical activity among adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer. Psychooncology. 2018 Aug;27(8):1875-1888. doi: 10.1002/pon.4743. Epub 2018 Jun 5. — View Citation
Burkart M, Sanford S, Dinner S, Sharp L, Kinahan K. Future health of AYA survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Feb;66(2):e27516. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27516. Epub 2018 Oct 26. — View Citation
Buysse DJ, Yu L, Moul DE, Germain A, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Shablesky-Cade MA, Pilkonis PA. Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep. 2010 Jun;33(6):781-92. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.6.781. — View Citation
Chadwick P, Hember M, Symes J, Peters E, Kuipers E, Dagnan D. Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;47(Pt 4):451-5. doi: 10.1348/014466508X314891. Epub 2008 Jun 20. — View Citation
Collins LM, Baker TB, Mermelstein RJ, Piper ME, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Christiansen BA, Schlam TR, Cook JW, Fiore MC. The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Apr;41(2):208-26. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9253-x. — View Citation
Collins LM, Murphy SA, Nair VN, Strecher VJ. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Aug;30(1):65-73. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8. — View Citation
Coups EJ, Ostroff JS. A population-based estimate of the prevalence of behavioral risk factors among adult cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):702-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.011. — View Citation
DiCiccio TJ, Efron B. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statistical science. 1996:189-212.
DR H, RD G. Longitudinal data analysis. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience; 2006.
Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, Lee AM, Macfarlane DJ, Leung SS, Cerin E, Chan WY, Leung IP, Lam SH, Taylor AJ, Cheng KK. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012 Jan 30;344:e70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e70. — View Citation
Fox, K.R., & Corbin, C.B. The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 408-430 1989.
Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 May;30(5):777-81. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021. — View Citation
Garcia SF, Cella D, Clauser SB, Flynn KE, Lad T, Lai JS, Reeve BB, Smith AW, Stone AA, Weinfurt K. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 10;25(32):5106-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 20;26(6):1018. Lad, Thomas [added]. — View Citation
Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6. — View Citation
Hankin VV, D.; Polster, R. Maximizing Acceptance and Enrollment in MBSR Randomized Controlled Trials with Older Men Diagnosed with Cancer. . Poster presented to the 8th Annual International Scientific Conference of Mindfulness in Medicine, Health Care, and Society. Worcester, MA. 2010.
Hedeker D, Gibbons RD, Waternaux C. Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: comparing time-related contrasts between two groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 1999;24(1):70-93.
Hong YA, Goldberg D, Ory MG, Towne SD Jr, Forjuoh SN, Kellstedt D, Wang S. Efficacy of a Mobile-Enabled Web App (iCanFit) in Promoting Physical Activity Among Older Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study. JMIR Cancer. 2015 Jun 26;1(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/cancer.4389. — View Citation
Kendzierski D, DeCarlo KJ. Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two validation studies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1991.
Krull JL, MacKinnon DP. Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects. Multivariate Behav Res. 2001 Apr 1;36(2):249-77. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06. — View Citation
Lai J-S, Cella D, Choi S, Teresi JA, Hays RD, Stone AA. Developing a fatigue item bank for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS FIB version 1). Presented at the Meeting of the Survey Methods in Multicultural, Multinational, and Multiregional Contexts(3MC), Berlin, Germany. 2008.
Liu L, Moke DJ, Tsai KY, Hwang A, Freyer DR, Hamilton AS, Zhang J, Cockburn M, Deapen D. A Reappraisal of Sex-Specific Cancer Survival Trends Among Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 May 1;111(5):509-518. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy140. — View Citation
Lloyd GR, Hoffman SA, Welch WA, Blanch-Hartigan D, Gavin KL, Cottrell A, Cadmus-Bertram L, Spring B, Penedo F, Courneya KS, Phillips SM. Breast cancer survivors' preferences for social support features in technology-supported physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods evaluation. Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):423-434. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby112. — View Citation
McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med. 1993 Feb;16(1):103-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00844757. — View Citation
Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, Stein KD, Alteri R, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2. — View Citation
Munoz AR, Kaiser K, Yanez B, Victorson D, Garcia SF, Snyder MA, Salsman JM. Cancer experiences and health-related quality of life among racial and ethnic minority survivors of young adult cancer: a mixed methods study. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Dec;24(12):4861-4870. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3340-x. Epub 2016 Jul 19. — View Citation
Nass SJ, Beaupin LK, Demark-Wahnefried W, Fasciano K, Ganz PA, Hayes-Lattin B, Hudson MM, Nevidjon B, Oeffinger KC, Rechis R, Richardson LC, Seibel NL, Smith AW. Identifying and addressing the needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer: summary of an Institute of Medicine workshop. Oncologist. 2015 Feb;20(2):186-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0265. Epub 2015 Jan 7. — View Citation
Piercy KL, Troiano RP. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans From the US Department of Health and Human Services. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Nov;11(11):e005263. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005263. No abstract available. — View Citation
Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Reise SP, Stover AM, Riley WT, Cella D; PROMIS Cooperative Group. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):263-83. doi: 10.1177/1073191111411667. Epub 2011 Jun 21. — View Citation
Rabin C, Horowitz S, Marcus B. Recruiting young adult cancer survivors for behavioral research. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 Mar;20(1):33-6. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9317-0. — View Citation
Rabin C, Pinto B, Fava J. Randomized Trial of a Physical Activity and Meditation Intervention for Young Adult Cancer Survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016 Mar;5(1):41-7. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0033. Epub 2015 Oct 15. — View Citation
Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8. — View Citation
Rosenberg, M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress.1965.
Rovniak LS, Anderson ES, Winett RA, Stephens RS. Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: a prospective structural equation analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2002 Spring;24(2):149-56. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2402_12. — View Citation
Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987 Nov;16(6):825-36. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3. — View Citation
Salsman JM, Garcia SF, Yanez B, Sanford SD, Snyder MA, Victorson D. Physical, emotional, and social health differences between posttreatment young adults with cancer and matched healthy controls. Cancer. 2014 Aug 1;120(15):2247-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28739. Epub 2014 May 28. — View Citation
Salsman JM, Victorson D, Choi SW, Peterman AH, Heinemann AW, Nowinski C, Cella D. Development and validation of the positive affect and well-being scale for the neurology quality of life (Neuro-QOL) measurement system. Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2569-80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0382-0. Epub 2013 Mar 23. — View Citation
Schneider J, Malinowski P, Watson PM, Lattimore P. The role of mindfulness in physical activity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2019 Mar;20(3):448-463. doi: 10.1111/obr.12795. Epub 2018 Nov 23. — View Citation
Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996 Jul;9(3):455-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02103658. — View Citation
Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Dec;17(4):338-45. — View Citation
Valle CG, Tate DF, Mayer DK, Allicock M, Cai J. A randomized trial of a Facebook-based physical activity intervention for young adult cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):355-68. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0279-5. Epub 2013 Mar 27. — View Citation
Valle CG, Tate DF. Engagement of young adult cancer survivors within a Facebook-based physical activity intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):667-679. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0483-3. — View Citation
Victorson D, Du H, Hankin V, et al. Mindfulness based stress reduction decreases fear of progression over time for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance: results from a randomized clinical trial. The Journal of Urology. 2012 2012;187(4S):384.
Victorson D, Garland, E, Hanley, A, Greco, C. Is Mindfulness Immeasurable? Discovery and Dialogue of Conceptual, Practical, Scientific, and Experiential Solutions. Global Advances in Health and Medicine. 2018 7(1160):13.
Victorson D, Hankin V, Burns J, Weiland R, Maletich C, Sufrin N, Schuette S, Gutierrez B, Brendler C. Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary psychological benefits of mindfulness meditation training in a sample of men diagnosed with prostate cancer on active surveillance: results from a randomized controlled pilot trial. Psychooncology. 2017 Aug;26(8):1155-1163. doi: 10.1002/pon.4135. Epub 2016 May 3. — View Citation
Victorson D, Maletich, C, Gutierrez, B, Schuette, S, Morgan, T, Kutikov, A, Kundu, S, Eggener, S, Brendler, C. Description of a New National Cancer Institute Funded Randomized Controlled Trial
Victorson D, Maletich, C, Sufrin, N, Schuette, S, Gutierrez, B, Cordero, E, Johnson, C, Stencel, D, Bakosh, L, Ring, M. Development of a New Clinical Mindfulness Research Tool to Enhance, Deliver and Streamline Online Mindfulness Interventions. THE JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE. 2016;0(0):A21.
Victorson DS, J; Garcia, S; Snyder, M; Munoz, A. Identifying Challenges, Assets and Quality of Life Impacts among Young Adults with Cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;Suppl 2(P1-81):91.
Welk GJ, McClain JJ, Eisenmann JC, Wickel EE. Field validation of the MTI Actigraph and BodyMedia armband monitor using the IDEEA monitor. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Apr;15(4):918-28. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.624. — View Citation
Wojcicki TR, White SM, McAuley E. Assessing outcome expectations in older adults: the multidimensional outcome expectations for exercise scale. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jan;64(1):33-40. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbn032. Epub 2009 Jan 29. — View Citation
* Note: There are 51 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Physical Activity before and after the 12-week technology supported physical activity interventions in young adult cancer survivors | Physical activity will be measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks.The ActiGraph accelerometer will be used. At each time point, participants will wear the device for 7 consecutive days during all waking hours, except when bathing or swimming. Each valid minute of wear time will be classified according to intensity (counts/min) using commonly accepted cut-points: sedentary (<100), light activity (100-2019) and moderate/vigorous physical activity (=2020). The Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire will also be used. | 24 weeks | |
Secondary | Physical Function in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden on physical function will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (5=without any difficulty to 1=unable to do). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Anxiety in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden of anxiety will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 4-item scale measures uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=always). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The lower scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Depression in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden of depression will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=always). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The lower scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Fatigue in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden of fatigue will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The lower scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Sleep Disturbance in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden of sleep disturbance will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The lower scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Sleep Impairment in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden of sleep disturbance will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment - Short Form 4a.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The lower scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Ability to participate in social roles and activities in young adult cancer survivors | Ability to participate in social roles and activities will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (5=never to 1=always). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The lower scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Applied Cognition Abilities in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden on applied cognitive abilities will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS Applied Cognition-Abilities-Short Form 4a.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Pain interference in young adult cancer survivors | Pain interference will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (5=never to 1=always). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The lower scores represent better outcome.. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Pain intensity in young adult cancer survivors | Pain intensity will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS 29 Profile v2.1.
This 1-item scale uses a 11-point Likert scale (0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable). The minimum value one can score is 0, and the maximum is 10. The lower score represents better outcome.. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Physical self-perception in young adult cancer survivors | Physical Self-Perception will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Physical Self-Perception Profile-Physical Self-worth Subscale.
This instrument used to assess self-esteem relative to several domains of physical functioning in a hierarchical, multidimensional fashion. The instrument contains a general physical self-worth scale (PSW) which subsumes four more specific scales of perceived sport competence (SPORT), physical condition (COND), attractive body (BODY), and strength (STRENGTH), with six items per scale. Participants indicated on a four-point scale the degree to which each item is characteristic or true of them. Responses range from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (completely true), with higher scores representing better outcome. The minimum value one can score is 6, and the maximum is 24. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Confidence in ability to be regularly active in young adult cancer survivors | Confidence in ability to be regularly active will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Exercise Self-Efficacy (EXSE).
This short form assesses the participants' beliefs in their ability to be regularly active "for the next 12 weeks" on a scale from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (completely confident), with higher scores representing better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Confidence in ability to be regularly active despite common barriers in young adult cancer survivors | Confidence in ability to be regularly active despite common barriers will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Barries Self-Efficacy (BARSE).
This scale assesses the beliefs in ability to be regularly active despite common barriers "for the next 12 weeks" on a scale from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (completely confident), with higher scores representing better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Leisure Time Physical Activity in young adult cancer survivors | Leisure time physical activity will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire Physical Activity.
This is a measure of self-reported physical activity participation. Participants report "times per week" they participate in strenuous (e.g., jogging), moderate (e.g., fast walking), and mild (e.g., easy walking) exercise over the past 7 days and the "average duration each time you exercised (in minutes)" for each of the three activity categories. Weekly minutes of total, light, moderate, and vigorous activity are calculated by multiplying the frequency and time of each activity. This value is divided by 7 to obtain daily averages. The minimum value one can score is 0, and the maximum depends on the number of self-reported minutes of physical activity. Higher scores indicate better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Sitting time in young adult cancer survivors | Sitting time in young adult cancer survivors will be assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Sitting Time Questionnaire.
This questionnaire assesses the amount of hours and minutes spent sitting during weekdays and weekends, with lower scores representing better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Outcome expectations for exercise in young adult cancer survivors | Outcome expectations for exercise in young adult cancer survivors will be assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Outcome Expectations for Exercise_MOEES.
This scale assesses the beliefs and expectations about the benefits of regular exercise and physical activity on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores representing better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Self-Esteem in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden on self-esteem will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
This scale assesses global self-esteem and consists of 10-items asking participants to indicate their level of agreement/disagreement with each statement. Sample items include: "I feel that I'm a person of worth, at least on an equal basis with others;" and "I am able to things as well as most people." Participants respond on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). The minimum value one can score is 10, and the maximum is 50. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Emotional Support in young adult cancer survivors | Symptom burden on emotional support will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the PROMIS Emotional Support - Short Form 4a.
This 4-item scale uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=always). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Social support for exercise in young adult cancer survivors | Social support for exercise will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Social Support for Exercise Scale.
This scale assesses support for physical activity received from the following categories: family, friends, and other cancer survivors. Statements are scored on a Likert scale of 1 (never) to 5 (very often) for each of the three categories, with higher scores representing better outcome. The minimum value one can score for each category is 10, and the maximum is 50. The minimum value of the total measure is 30, and the maximum is 150. An additional "does not apply" response option is provided on the measure. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Mindful Awareness in young adult cancer survivors | Mindful awareness of distressing thoughts and images will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ).
This 16-item scale measures mindful awareness during distressing thoughts and images. Using a 7-point Likert scale (0=strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree), items reflect the following subscales: mindful observation (4 items), letting go (4 items), non- aversion (4 items), and non-judgment (4 items). The minimum value one can score on any of the subscales is 0, and the maximum is 24. The minimum value of the total measure is 0, and the maximum is 96. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Mindful acceptance in young adult cancer survivors | Mindful acceptance will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Mindful Allowance - Acceptance v1.0 - Short Form 4a.
This 4-item scale measures uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Mindful self-kindness in young adult cancer survivors | Mindful self-kindness will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Mindful Allowance - Self-Kindness v1.0 - Short Form 4a.
This 4-item scale measures uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Mindful de-centering in young adult cancer survivors | Mindful de-centering will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Mindful Insight - Decentering v1.0 - Short Form 4a.
This 4-item scale measures uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score is 4, and the maximum is 20. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Mindful presence in young adult cancer survivors | Mindful presence will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Mindful Presence - Awareness v1.0 - Short Form 4a,Mindful Presence - Curiosity v1.0 - Short Form 4a, and Mindful Presence v1.0 - Short Form 8a.
The measures use a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The minimum value one can score on the 4-item scales is 4, and the maximum is 20. The minimum value one can score on the 8-item scales is 8, and the maximum is 40. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Meditation experience in young adult cancer survivors | Meditation experience in young adult cancer survivors will be assessed using the Meditation Experience Questionnaire, a local questionnaire developed by the study researchers.
Participants will report on their experience and familiarity with meditation concepts and practices. The measure uses Yes-No response options (1=Yes; 0=No). The minimum value one can score is 0, and the maximum is 5. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
baseline | |
Secondary | Meditation practice in young adult cancer survivors | Meditation practice in young adult cancer survivors will be assessed using the Meditation Experience Questionnaire, a local questionnaire developed by the study researchers.
Participants will report on meditation practice. How long participants have practiced meditation is measured on a 4-point Likert scale (1="not applicable, I don't practice" to 4="5 or more years"). Average weekly practice frequency is measured on a 7-point Likert scale (1="Not applicable, I do not meditate on a regular basis" to 7="More than once a day"). Average time spent on meditation sessions is measured on a 6-point Likert scale (1="Not applicable, I do not meditate on a regular basis" to 6="Greater than 60 minutes").The minimum value one can score on is 1; the maximum is 17. Higher scores represent better outcome. Significant change will be indicated by p<.05 on reported practice between baseline and follow up time points between interventions. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Implementation feasibility measured by enrollment rate | This indicator of implementation feasibility for the interventions delivered is defined by the overall enrollment rate being >/= 70% (e.g., total number of individuals enrolled/total number approached). Enrollment rate will be tracked continuously during the 24 week study. | 24 weeks | |
Secondary | Implementation feasibility measured by retention rate | This indicator of implementation feasibility for the interventions delivered is defined by the retention rate being >/= 70% (e.g., total number of participants who drop out/ total number randomized). Retention rate will be tracked continuously during the 24 weeks of the study and significant differences between the study interventions in the number of participant withdrawals will be tracked. | 24 weeks | |
Secondary | Adherence to the OPT2MOVE app + Fitbit by young adult cancer survivors | Adherence to the OPT2MOVE app + Fitbit will be monitored and usage tracked continuously during the 24 week study.
Objective data include Fitbit wear time, number of times app is opened each week, time spent in app each time it is opened, and for participants who receive each component, usage of general and moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity specific mindfulness videos (i.e. whether clicked, how many times and for how long), number of e-coaching exchanges, number of buddy training webinars attended, and number of buddy interactions in the app. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Acceptability of the technology supported physical activity interventions as measured by a post-intervention evaluation survey | Acceptability will be measured using a brief, Likert-type survey assessing participant enjoyment, satisfaction, perceived benefit, and ease of use. Acceptability is defined as >/= 70% of survey responses in affirmation of this. | 24 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in body mass index in young adult cancer survivors | Change in body mass index in young adult cancer survivors will be assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Health History Questionnaire, a local questionnaire developed by the study researchers.
Participants will report on the following: height and most recent weight. BMI will be calculated. Significant change will be indicated by p<.05 on reported health behaviors between baseline and follow up time points between study interventions. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in health behaviors in young adult cancer survivors | Change in health behaviors in young adult cancer survivors will be assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Health History Questionnaire, a local questionnaire developed by the study researchers.
Participants will report on the following: weekly leisure-time physical activities; weekly consumption of fruits, vegetables, red meat, processed meat, brown rice, beans, whole grain bread, fast food/snacks, caffeine, carbonated beverages; cigarette and alcohol use. Unhealthy behaviors will be reverse scored. Higher scores represent better outcome. Significant change will be indicated by p<.05 on reported health behaviors between baseline and follow up time points between study interventions. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in treatment expectations in young adult cancer survivors | Change in treatment expectations in young adult cancer survivors will be assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the HEAL - Treatment Expectancy - Short Form, OPT2MOVE Expectancy Items, and Positive Outlook v1.0 - Short Form 6a.
Participants will report on the expectations they have about the outcomes of the study treatment. Each scale measure uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in life event related stress in young adult cancer survivors | Change in life event related stress will be assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Health History Questionnaire, a local questionnaire developed by the study researchers.
This 10-item scale measures distress about life events (e.g., death of someone close; concerns about finances) on a 5-point Likert scale (0=not at all to 4=very much). The minimum value one can score is 0, and the maximum is 40. The higher scores represent better outcome. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Environmental factors in physical activity participation in young adult cancer survivors | environmental factors in physical activity participation will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Survey.
This 17-item questionnaire assesses environmental factors in physical activity participation, such as neighborhood safety, aesthetic qualities, neighborhood infrastructure, and access to destinations. Each question is rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 4 (Strongly agree). Higher scores indicate higher neighborhood walkability. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in key components of multi-purpose action control framework in young adult cancer survivors | Change in key components of M-PAC framework will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) questionnaire.
The following components will be measured in 5-point Likert scale: affective attitude (score:3-15), instrumental attitude(score:3-15), perceived capability (score:3-15), perceived opportunity (score:3-15), behavioral regulation (score:6-30), habit formation (score:4-20), identity formation (score:4-20); and two items for decisional intentions (score:1-12). Higher score means higher levels of reflective, regulatory, and reflexive processes that may have facilitated exercise behavior change. |
24 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in executive function in young adult cancer survivors | Change in executive function will be measured at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks using the Amsterdam Executive Functioning Inventory.
The 13-item inventory groups items into three dimensions: attention; self-control; and planning. Responses are scored on a 3-point Likert scale: from 1 (not true) to 3=(true). Total score of all items is calculated so that higher scores are indicative of better outcome. |
24 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05346796 -
Survivorship Plan HEalth REcord (SPHERE) Implementation Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05094804 -
A Study of OR2805, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting CD163, Alone and in Combination With Anticancer Agents
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04867850 -
Effect of Behavioral Nudges on Serious Illness Conversation Documentation
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04086251 -
Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring in Oncology Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01285037 -
A Study of LY2801653 in Advanced Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00680992 -
Study of Denosumab in Subjects With Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00062842 -
Study of Irinotecan on a Weekly Schedule in Children
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04548063 -
Consent Forms in Cancer Research: Examining the Effect of Length on Readability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04337203 -
Shared Healthcare Actions and Reflections Electronic Systems in Survivorship
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04349293 -
Ex-vivo Evaluation of the Reactivity of the Immune Infiltrate of Cancers to Treatments With Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Immunomodulatory Pathways
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02866851 -
Feasibility Study of Monitoring by Web-application on Cytopenia Related to Chemotherapy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05304988 -
Development and Validation of the EFT for Adolescents With Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT04448041 -
CRANE Feasibility Study: Nutritional Intervention for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
|
||
Completed |
NCT00340522 -
Childhood Cancer and Plexiform Neurofibroma Tissue Microarray for Molecular Target Screening and Clinical Drug Development
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04843891 -
Evaluation of PET Probe [64]Cu-Macrin in Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer and Sarcoidosis.
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844048 -
An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03167372 -
Pilot Comparison of N-of-1 Trials of Light Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03109041 -
Initial Feasibility Study to Treat Resectable Pancreatic Cancer With a Planar LDR Source
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01441115 -
ECI301 and Radiation for Advanced or Metastatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06206785 -
Resting Energy Expenditure in Palliative Cancer Patients
|