Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Other |
Process measure of habituation: Subjective Unit of Distress (SUD; Wolpe, 1969) |
The SUD is a self-report scale from 0 to 10 for measuring the subjective intensity of distress experienced by an individual; subjective distress refers to uncomfortable or painful emotions felt. The SUD will be completed pre and post narration of each trauma event to assess for within session habituation and then repeated for re-narration of each trauma event for between session habituation. |
For approximately ten weeks |
|
| Other |
Change in post traumatic growth between the baseline, the last NET session, and 1 month and up to three months follow up phases - as assessed by the Post-traumatic growth inventory (PTGI; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996) |
Post traumatic growth is defined as the ability of the individual to experience positive changes in the aftermath of extremely negative experiences; the positive changes usually occur in the context of the self, interpersonal relationships, and philosophy of life (Anderson & Lopez-Baez, 2017). The PTGI consists of 21 items which cover five domains: relating to others, new possibilities, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation of life. The PTGI has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .90) and test-retest reliability (r = .71) (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996). |
On week two, week 15, week 19, and week 31 |
|
| Other |
Change in existential anxiety symptoms between the baseline, the last NET session, and 1 month and up to three months follow up phases - as assessed by theExistential Concerns Questionnaire (ECQ; van Bruggen, 2018) |
Existential anxiety represents a form of anxiety that goes beyond experiencing anxiety as a consequence of a concrete threat, it is instead related to a threat to our existence as a whole (Glas, 2003); as mentioned in the background section, cancer patients often question their own individual values and the meaning of their existence. Research has demonstrated that cancer patients with higher levels of existential well-being (e.g., less fear related to disease recurrence) report better QoL and lower emotional distress (Brady et al., 1999; Edmondson et al., 2008, Visser et al., 2010). This 13-item questionnaire covers anxiety in reaction to death, guilt, and meaninglessness. The ECQ has shown good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of .91 and test-retest reliability (van Bruggen, 2018). |
On week two, week 15, week 19, and week 31 |
|
| Other |
Change in body awareness and autonomic reactivity between the baseline, the last NET session, and 1 month and up to 3 months follow-up phases - as assessed by the Body Perception Questionnaire Short Form - Autonomic Nervous System (Porges, 1993, 2015) |
The Body Perception Questionnaire (BPQ) is a self-report measure of body awareness and autonomic reactivity. For the purpose of this research project, the Autonomic Nervous System subscale was taken into consideration. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a set of neural pathways connecting the brain and body; these pathways send information and signals from the body about the status of organs and tissues (i.e., afferent projections). These signals can alter the functions of the body, depending on internal and external needs. The BPQ-SF has shown good internal consistency (categorical omega between .77 and .96) and test-retest reliability (r = .96 to .99). |
On week two, week 15, week 19, and week 31 |
|
| Other |
Change Interviews (Elliot et al., 2001) |
The feasibility and acceptability of video NET will be investigated by conducting Change Interviews with participants approximately one month after completing the treatment. In this instance, the participant will be asked to provide feedback on their experience of receiving treatment, including in terms of barriers and fascinators to engagement. The interviews will be conducted by an external researcher, i.e. another Trainee Clinical Psychologist, following an adaptation of Elliott, Slatick, & Urman's (2001) protocol. The interviews will be audio- or video-recorded and then sent to the student/investigator for transcription and analysis. |
At 1 month follow up |
|
| Primary |
Change in PTS symptoms between the baseline, NET intervention, and 1 month and up to three months follow-up phases - as assessed by thePTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C; Weathers et al., 1994) |
The PCL-C explores items related to individuals' past stressful experiences using a 17-item self-report checklist (Weathers et al., 1994). The PCL-C has been widely used in cancer research (such as DuHamel et al., 2010; Levine et al., 2005; Lleras de Frutos et al., 2020; Ochoa-Arnedo et al., 2020) and was assessed as a screening instrument by Andrykowski and colleagues in their study with breast cancer survivors in 1998. The PCL-C has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha >.75) (Wilkins et al., 2011) and good test-retest reliability with scores ranging from 0.68 and 0.92 (Hahn et al., 2015). Scores above 29 are indicative of clinical concerns; the US Department of Veterans Affairs recommends a cut-off score of 30 to 38 for diagnosis of PTSD (www.ptsd.va.gov). |
Throughout the study, for approximately 31 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
Change in depression and anxiety symptoms between the baseline, NET intervention, and 1 month and up to three months follow-up phases - as assessed byHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983) |
The HADS is the most extensively studied mood scale in cancer services (as well as in other medical settings) (Mitchell et al., 2010). It is a fourteen item self-report measure of anxiety and depression that has demonstrated to be psychometrically robust showing good internal consistency (Anxiety Cronbach's alpha = .83; Depression Cronbach's alpha = .82) (Bjelland et al., 2002) and good test-retest reliability (Anxiety r = .82; Depression r = .52) (Martin & Thompson, 2002). Scores of 8 and above are indicative of clinical concerns. |
Throughout the study, for approximately 31 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
Change in cancer-specific quality of life between the baseline, NET intervention, and 1 month and up to three months follow-up phases - as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General 7 items (FACT-G7; Yanez et al., 2013) |
The FACT-G7 is a brief, cancer-specific quality-of-life measure comprising 7 items from the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale (FACT-G; Cella et al., 1993) that were endorsed by cancer patients as being of highest priority. Its items comprise physical, emotional and functional domains. Total scores range between 0 and 28, and higher scores indicate better quality of life. The FACT-G7 has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = between .72 and .80) (Mah et al., 2020) and good test-retest reliability (scores between .52 and .74) (King et al., 2020). |
Throughout the study, for approximately 31 weeks |
|
