Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04994730 |
Other study ID # |
IC 2020-14 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
May 25, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
May 25, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2021 |
Source |
Institut Curie |
Contact |
Nathalie BADOIS, MD |
Phone |
+33144324535 |
Email |
nathalie.badois[@]curie.fr |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Prospective monocentric quality of life study. Including all patients who have been exentered
at the Institut Curie Paris, from January 2004 to December 2019, proposing to compare the
reported quality of life of patients according to the reconstruction technique they have
undergone.
The sponsor will evaluate the quality of life of our patients by means of two validated
questionnaires, in French, in the context of ENT surgery: the FACT-G and FACT-MBIS
questionnaires.
Description:
It is now obvious to all surgeons involved in the follow-up of these patients that not all
orbital reconstruction techniques are equal.
Thus, through this study, The investigators wish to objectively highlight the gain in quality
of life and prosthetic equipment in exentered patients, depending on the reconstruction
method used.
This prospective study, including all patients who have been exentered at the Institut Curie
Paris, from January 2004 to December 2019, proposes to compare the reported quality of life
of patients according to the reconstruction technique patients have undergone.
The investigators will evaluate the quality of life of our patients by means of two validated
questionnaires, in French, in the context of ENT surgery: the FACT-G and FACT-MBIS
questionnaires. The investigators will submit them, after express telephone agreement, by
post to all the patients included in our study.
The aim of such a study will therefore be to provide assistance to both surgeons and patients
in the choice of an orbital reconstruction technique, by objectively demonstrating the
superiority of one technique over the others in terms of quality of life and prosthetic
equipment rate.
The patients included in this study will have to answer two questionnaires, submitted by
post. This study therefore falls within the framework of minimal or moderate risk studies.
The patients will be informed by telephone interview about the method of writing the
questionnaires and their content.
The investigators will pay particular attention to the quality of life of the patients who
have benefited from a free ante-brachial flap reconstruction in comparison with other
reconstruction techniques; this will constitute the main criterion of our study.
In addition, the collection of pseudo-anonymised computerised data from all the patient files
will give rise to a comparison of post-operative healing times, the rate of prosthetic
fitting, and the time taken to fit the prosthesis according to the reconstruction techniques.
These three factors, already identified in the literature as indicators of good
rehabilitationn , will constitute our secondary judgment criteria.