A Clinical Trial With Intranasal Fentanyl in Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain

Cancer Clinical Trial

— NOSE-400  

Official title:

A Dose Titrated Clinical Trial With a Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomised, Cross-over Phase to Demonstrate the Efficacy of 400 μg Intranasal Fentanyl (INFS) Dose Strength, and to Evaluate 12 Weeks Safety and Nasal Tolerability of All Dose Strengths Between 50 μg and 400 μg, in Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01429051
• Other study ID #: FT-1301-032-SP
• Secondary ID: 2010-021096-85U1
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: September 1, 2011
• Last updated: February 20, 2014
• Start date: August 2011
• Est. completion date: January 2013

Study information

• Verified date: February 2014
• Source: Takeda
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Hungary: National Institute of PharmacyNorway: Norwegian Medicines AgencyRussia: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this clinical trial was to demonstrate the efficacy of a 400 μg dose strength of intranasal fentanyl spray (INFS, Instanyl®) and to evaluate the safety and to establish long term tolerability of treatment with INFS doses of 50, 100, 200 and 400 μg.

Description:

This is a clinical trial with 12 weeks treatment of Intranasal fentanyl (INFS) in cancer patients with breakthrough pain (BTP). It was composed of a dose titrated, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, cross-over efficacy phase, combined with a titration and a tolerability phase assessing the safety and nasal tolerability of INFS. The trial is set up with a screening period and three treatment phases: a titration phase (I), an efficacy phase (II) and a tolerability phase (III). The entire trial period for each completed patient consisted of the one week screening period and 12 weeks treatment with INFS.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 46
• Est. completion date: January 2013
• Est. primary completion date: January 2013
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

All inclusion criteria were answered 'yes' for a patient to participate in the clinical trial.

• Is the patient a cancer patient with breakthrough Pain (BTP)?

• Has the patient received either oral opioids or transdermal fentanyl for treatment of background pain (BGP) within the last month prior to the screening visit?

• Is the current dose of prescribed opioids (for BGP) equivalent to 60-1000 mg oral morphine/day?

• Has the patient's BGP for the last 7 days prior to the screening visit been generally stable, and on average controlled to a mild level (defined as = 4 on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale [NRS])?

• Does the patient (at the time of the screening visit) experience his/her current BTP episodes to be of such severe pain intensity, that he/she in general needs additional analgesia (i.e. on top of the background opioid treatment)?

• Has the patient on average for the last 7 days prior to the screening visit had at least three BTP episodes per week, but no more than four BTP episodes per day?

• Is the patient able to use intranasal drugs?

• Is the life expectancy of the patient at least 3 months from the date of the screening visit?

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Has the patient had an illicit substance abuse within the last year prior to screening?

2. Does the patient have severe hepatic impairment? - defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT or) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels > 3x upper limit of normal (ULN)

3. Does the patient have severe renal impairment? - defined as serum creatinine = 3.0 mg/dl (265 micromol/L)

4. Has the patient ever had facial radiotherapy or is the patient scheduled to facial radiotherapy?

5. Has the patient been treated with any monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors within the last 14 days prior to the screening visit?

6. Does the patient have severe impaired respiratory function, which may increase the risk of clinically relevant respiratory depression by BTP fentanyl treatment?

7. Is the patient known to be hypersensitive to fentanyl or to other opioids or any of their excipients?

8. Does the patient have any head injury, primary brain tumor or other pathological conditions, which could significantly increase the risk of increased intracranial pressure or impaired consciousness?

Study Design

Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Break Through Pain
• Breakthrough Pain
• Cancer

Intervention

Drug:
• Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)
Applied as 1 puff (= 1 dose) in one nostril, or applied as two puffs (= 2 doses, 1 in each nostril) with ten minutes apart.
• Placebo
Matching intranasal placebo spray

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Takeda

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Hungary,  Norway,  Russian Federation, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Induction Phase: Pain Intensity Difference at 10 Minutes (PID10) After Treatment	During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID10 is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to 10 minutes. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a = 2-point difference is considered as clinically important.	During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose of study drug.	No
Secondary	Incidence of Improvement or Worsening in Nasal Mucosa Sign or Abnormality Score	Medical examination of the nasal cavity by rhinoscopy was performed by an oto-rhino-laryngologist before the start of study treatment and at 12 weeks. Signs and any abnormalities were observed for each nostril using the following 4 points assessment scale: • 0 =not present; • 1 =present in a mild degree; • 2 =present in a moderate degree; • 3 =present in a severe degree. A difference in score of 1 or more from Baseline to the end of treatment represented a worsening, while a negative value indicated an improvement of the observed clinical sign. The oto-rhino-laryngologist also assessed whether worsening of a sign was related to study drug. Assessments for both left and right nostrils are presented together. The incidence is calculated as the number of assessments (n) in the improvement or worsening category divided by the number of assessments with a non-missing score for the Nasal Mucosa or Abnormality assessment. Only those signs or abnormalities with n>0 were included	Baseline and at 12 weeks	No
Secondary	Efficacy Phase: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5, 30, and 60 Minutes After First Dose of Study Drug	During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a = 2-point difference is considered as clinically important.	During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug.	No
Secondary	Efficacy Phase: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID0-60 and SPID0-30) Derived From PI Scores	The SPID30 and SPID60 represent the average improvement in pain intensity over the 30 minute interval and 60 minute interval, respectively. SPIDt was calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) for Pain Intensity Difference over the time interval 0 to t minutes, respectively, divided by the length of the time interval (t minutes). A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain.; Pain intensity was assessed at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point.	During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug	No
Secondary	Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a = 1, 2 or 3 Point Reduction in Pain Intensity	Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • greater than or equal to 1 point reduction in pain intensity (PI) from time 0, • greater than or equal to 2 point reduction in PI from time 0, and • greater than or equal to 3 point reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain".	During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug	No
Secondary	Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a = 33% or 50% Reduction in Pain Intensity	Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • Greater than 33% reduction in PI from time 0;? • Greater than or equal to 50% reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain".	During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug	No
Secondary	Efficacy Phase: General Impression (GI) Score at 60 Minutes After First Dose	Participants assessed their general impression (GI) of treatment efficacy for treated BTP episodes at 60 minutes after first dose of study drug. The validated, categorical 5-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) was used for this assessment and scored as follows: 0 =poor; 1 =fair; 2 =good; 3 =very good; 4 =excellent.	During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, 60 minutes after first dose of study drug.	No
Secondary	Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)	The severity (intensity of each AE was assessed as mild (transient symptoms, no interference with daily activities), moderate (marked symptoms, moderate interference with daily activities), or severe (considerable interference with daily activities) by the investigator. Serious adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death or is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. The investigator assessed each AE as either related or not related to study treatment.	12 weeks	Yes