View clinical trials related to Bronchoscopy.
Filter by:Advances in medical imaging technology have made it possible to detect patients with small-sized lung lesions early. Generally, invasive methods such as PCNA were used to diagnose peripheral lung nodule. However, Radial probe endobronchial ultrasonography (RP-EBUS) is widely used in the histological diagnosis of peripheral lung nodule in recent years. In order to carry out RP-EBUS, it is necessary to know the path to the lesion to access it. Conventionally, the path to the peripheral lung nodule is identified by the drawing, but recently, the path is reviewed by the virtual bronchoscopy navigation (VBN) which is reconstructed 3-dimension image using the CT data. Currently, VBN is driven by using raw data acquired using standard thin sectioned chest CT protocol, but the problem is that additional doses of radiation are exposed to patients who have initially discovered lung lesions using low dose CT. Therefore, we conduct a randomized controlled trial to verify the suitability of VBN using the raw data acquired by low dose CT.
Role of bronchoscopy in diagnosis of bronchiectasis in to different types
The aim of this study protocol is to evaluate the feasibility of biopsies using the new system called Archimedes® in 12 patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) suspicious of malignancy not accessible through current bronchoscopy techniques.
The execution of diagnostic-therapeutic investigations by bronchial endoscopy can expose the patient to acute respiratory failure (ARF). In particular, the risk of hypoxemia is greater during broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). For this reason, oxygen therapy is administered at low or high flows during the course of bronchoscopic procedures, in order to avoid hypoxemia. Few clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (HFNC) during BAL procedures, and no study has evaluated, during bronchial endoscopy, the effects of HFNC on diaphragmatic effort (assessed with ultrasound) and aeration and ventilation of the different lung regions (assessed with electrical impedance tomography). Therefore, investigators conceived the present randomized controlled study to evaluate possible differences existing during bronchoscopy between oxygen therapy administered with HFNC and conventional (low-flow) oxygen therapy, delivered through nasal cannula.
Therapeutic bronchoscopy is a common procedure to treat respiratory diseases. The procedure includes stent implantation, bronchus dilation, electronic incision, laser therapy, and so on. Most of these procedures are painful and require general anesthesia. Conventionally, the general anesthesia for therapeutic bronchoscopy was performed using laryngeal mask. But in the previous experiences, the investigators found that sedation with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil was as effect as laryngeal mask anesthesia. The present study was performed to compare the two approach for sedation or anesthesia in therapeutic bronchoscopy.
Diagnostic bronchoscopy is an invasive procedure performed to diagnose respiratory diseases. But pain has been complained by most of the patients receiving such procedures. Sedation or anesthesia was required by both of the patients and bronchoscopists. Unfortunately, no consensus has been made upon the sedation strategies. Multiple sedation approaches have been applied, such as midazolam and fentanyl, remifentanil and propofol, dexmedetomidine and propofol. The present study was designed to compare these protocols in sedation for diagnostic bronchoscopy.
The best opioid for bronchoscopy is still unclear.This randomized double-blind prospective study was conducted on a total of 60 patients who were randomly allocated into 3 groups: Group S received sufentanil 0.1 mcg/kg, Group F received fentanyl 1 mcg/kg and Group R received remifentanil target-controlled infusion with effect-site target concentration of 1ng/ml. Patients in all groups received midazolam to achieve moderate levels of sedation as assessed by the Narcotrend (NT; between B1 and C2). Adverse events, patient tolerance and physician satisfaction were analized.
The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of sufentanil combined with midazolam in bronchoscopy under conscious sedation. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients undergoing bronchoscopy applying sufentanil and midazolam under conscious sedation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from September 2013 to July 2017.
This study aims to characterize airflow patterns during bronchoscopy under conscious sedation, and determine the incidence of obstructive and central respiratory events. The investigators also plan to monitor the degree and frequency of oxygen desaturation throughout the procedure. To achieve this, investigators use a physiologic monitoring device (NOX T3, K082113) that has been FDA approved for the screening and diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing [1]. The results from this pilot study will be used to assess the feasibility of a prospective study utilizing continuous external negative pressure (Pneuway). This negative pressure is applied through a neck mask to alleviate upper airway collapsibility and can potentially decrease the number of apneas during bronchoscopy under conscious sedation [2].
Flexible bronchoscopy is one of the most widely performed procedures for diagnosis of various bronchopulmonary diseases. Most patients tolerate the procedure well although cough is often reported as a distressing symptom. It is likely that the acceptance of bronchoscopy would be significantly improved with control of cough. Topical lignocaine is administered during bronchoscopy for local anaesthesia. There is uncertainty regarding the adequate dose of lignocaine sprays for pharyngeal anaesthesia during flexible bronchoscopy. This study would help to determine the optimal dose of lignocaine sprays for pharyngeal anaesthesia during flexible bronchoscopy.