View clinical trials related to Breast Conserving Surgery.
Filter by:The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the Quality of Recovery (QoR) in Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS) with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) using Pectoral Nerves (PECS) Block and General Anesthesia (GA). The primary objectives are as follows: First, to determine if the PECS group exhibits better QoR; Second, to investigate if the PECS group experiences less postoperative pain and complications; Third, to examine if the PECS group demonstrates more stable hemodynamics.
The standard method for localizing non-palpable breast cancer is currently clip localization, its positive margin rate still remains around 20-50%. This study aims to compare the accuracy and efficacy of single vs. combined breast tissue markers in localizing non-palpable breast cancer.
The standard method for localizing non-palpable breast cancer is currently preoperative wire-guided localization, its positive margin rate still remains around 20-50%. This study aims to compare the accuracy and efficacy of wire vs. combined breast tissue markers in localizing non-palpable breast cancer.
A growing number of Chinese breast cancer patients are diagnosed at a young age. The quality of life of young breast cancer patients has been a critical issue. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) not only removes the tumor but also maintains the appearance of breast. The Breast Tumor Center of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital is one of the first departments in China to perform breast-conserving surgeries. Endoscopic breast surgery has emerged as a promising surgical approach. However, it is hard to delineate the tumor margins in endoscopic BCS, which restrains its development. In traditional BCS, surgeons determine the tumor border by palpation, which is impossible in endoscopic BCS. For the first time, we performed the intra-operative navigation system-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery, in which the tumor border was accurately delineated using the navigation system.
The LOLIPOP Trial is a large (n=4,300 patients) pragmatic, international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel assessment, safety and effectiveness superiority study.
The investigators will perform this study to prospectively compare the clinical outcome after percutaneous microwave ablation(MWA) and breast conserving surgery of benign and malignant breast lesion under ultrasound (US) guidance.
Following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for localized ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, whole-breast irradiation (WBRT) is a standard of care, reducing the absolute rate of in-breast recurrences (IBR) by more than 15% at 10 years, from 28% without radiotherapy to 13 % with radiotherapy. Half of the recurrences occurred as invasive disease. Whereas in the comparative trials, WBRT did not impact on overall survival, survival of patients who recurred with invasive cancers was impaired in comparison to patients who did not recur, or to patients with DCIS-only recurrences. Using criteria based on age, tumor size, nuclear grade, and margins status, several trials and cohort studies failed to identify subgroups of patients at low risk, who could be safely spared the need for WBRT. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) DCIS trial included patients treated with BCS for low- or intermediate grade DCIS revealed by unifocal microcalcifications, size ≤25 mm, margins ≥3 mm, and no residual microcalcifications after surgery. The 5-year rates of IBR were 3.5 % without radiotherapy, versus 0.4 % with radiotherapy, and 6.7 % and 0.9 % at 7 years, respectively (p <0.001). Sixty percent of the patients received tamoxifen in both groups. Several studies showed that the same molecular classes were identified in DCIS as in invasive cancers. Studies suggested that low proliferation, hormone receptors expression, and lack of ERBB2 amplification were associated with a low risk of IBR in patients not receiving radiotherapy. A combined signature was tested in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) trial, showing a 10% IBR rate at ten years in patients with a low-risk. Identifying very low-risk DCIS, using biological markers in addition to the clinical and histological markers of low-risk DCIS, could help to select patients who could be safely avoided WBRT following BCS. It would avoid over-treatment in these women and could decrease the cost of management.
The quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is the outcome measure of choice in England and Wales for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). To be able to conduct a cost utility analysis, QALY data is required. This can either be collected within trial or published data can be used. In the United Kingdom (UK) there is no up to date QALY data for women with early breast cancer treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy. The OSTaRa Study aims to provide up to date QALY data for women in this cohort.
In this study,the eligible breast cancer patients will be randomized divided into two groups. the study group receive the accelerated hypo-fractioned whole breast irradiation with a concurrent boost to the tumor bed (WBI 2.5Gy x18 and SIB 2.88Gy x18) and the control group receive conventional fractioned whole breast irradiation with a concurrent boost to the tumor bed(WBI 1.8Gy x28 and SIB 2.15Gy x28). All radiotherapy will be delivered by external beam-intensity modulated radiotherapy. the purpose of this study is to assess whether the accelerated hypo-fractioned is non-inferior to the conventional fractionated radiotherapy. The outcomes evaluation will include acute toxicity , late toxicity including breast fibrosis and cardiac disease, cosmetic outcome ,local control and survival outcome.
The aim of this study is to compare conventional and ultrasound guided paravertebral blocks to with respect to efficacy, patient satisfaction and complication rates.