View clinical trials related to Brain Injuries, Traumatic.
Filter by:The main goal of this clinical trial is to check if the treatment is safe and well-tolerated. Researchers will compare the MR-301 active drug group with the placebo group to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the drug. Other measurements include assessing the patient's overall outcome, neurological responses, time spent in the intensive care unit, time in the hospital, and mortality. Participants will receive either MR-301 BID IV dosing or a matching placebo for a total of 3 weeks.
This was a multicenter randomized controlled study of 98 severe Traumatic Brain Injury patients with tracheostomy. Patients enrolled were divided randomly into the observation group with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding or the control group with Nasogastric tube feeding for enteral nutrition support, respectively. Nutritional status, complications, decannulation of tracheostomy tubes and level of consciousness on day 1 and day 28 were recorded and compared.
The goal of this observational study is to identify blood biomarkers that could help in the management of paediatric patients with mild TBI. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How can blood biomarkers reduce unnecessary CT scan and reduce the length of stay at the emergency department? 2. How can blood biomarker predict post-concussion symptoms? Participants will have a blood sample taken when they are admitted at emergency department and will receive a questionnaire describing their symptoms 14 days and 3 months after their trauma.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the impact of daily self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) therapy on the cognitive function of individuals with moderate to severe cognitive impairment resulting from a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study aims to answer the following questions: Does daily self-administered tDCS therapy, when combined with computerized cognitive training (CCT), improve cognitive function in TBI patients? Is CCT+tDCS with anodic stimulation more effective than CCT+tDCS with simulated stimulation in enhancing immediate and one-month post-treatment cognitive function? Does CCT+tDCS with anodic stimulation lead to better functionality immediately and one month after treatment compared to CCT+tDCS with simulated stimulation? Does CCT+tDCS with anodic stimulation have a positive impact on mood improvement immediately and one month after treatment compared to CCT+tDCS with simulated stimulation? Participants in the study will engage in CCT through a smartphone or tablet application and self-administer tDCS therapy for 20 minutes each day for a duration of one month. The tDCS therapy will involve applying a 2 mA anodic current to the prefrontal dorsolateral cortex (PFDL). Prior to the intervention, patients or their caregivers will receive training on the proper and safe usage of the tDCS device. Cognitive function, mood, and functionality will be evaluated before and after the intervention using appropriate measurement scales. The outcomes of this clinical trial have the potential to identify an effective and accessible therapeutic approach to enhance cognitive function in individuals with moderate to severe TBI. The combination of tDCS therapy with CCT offers an appealing and feasible treatment strategy for these patients, particularly when conducted in a home setting. The findings from this study will guide future clinical trials in the field of cognitive rehabilitation for TBI patients. Researchers will compare active tDCS with sham tDCS to determine if there are differences in the primary outcomes mentioned.
The goal of this study is to test the effect of a planning, reminders, and micro-incentives intervention verses regular health education facts on physical activity participation over 12-weeks, in older adults who have previously suffered a non-penetrating mild or moderate TBI. Participants will provide information and be screened for eligibility via phone screening call (verification of age, confirmation that the participant is not currently on any medication that affects the central nervous system, and verification that the subject can participate in exercise, brief TBI history). Baseline testing will take place at the Center for Cognitive and Brain Health and Northeastern University Biomedical Imaging Center, for the baseline magnetic resonance imaging, in the interdisciplinary science and engineering complex on Northeastern University's campus. In person testing will take place over one session. The study period lasts 12 weeks, during which all participants will 1. Receive a weekly phone call with study staff, 2. Wear a wrist-worn Fit Bit tracker and 3. Record their weekly walking activities.
Our understanding of neurosecretory dysfunction after TBI is still insufficient, and the number of patients with neuroendocrine dysfunction caused by craniocerebral trauma may be underestimated, especially the neuroendocrine changes related to HPA axis in the early stage after craniocerebral trauma. Moreover, there are few and fragmentary literature data on the benefits of hormone replacement therapy in patients with neuroendocrine disorders after traumatic brain injury. This requires more studies to further determine the characteristics of pituitary function or hormone disorders in the early stage after traumatic brain injury, which makes it necessary for us to further study the neuroendocrine dysfunction (hormone disorder) in the early stage after craniocerebral injury. To explore the relationship between craniocerebral injury and early hormone disorder by measuring the changes of early hormone levels in patients with TBI is of great significance for the early detection of related complications after craniocerebral injury and the evaluation of the prognosis of patients with craniocerebral injury, and can provide a new diagnosis and treatment plan for early intervention of related complications after TBI.
The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate communication through a brain implant in people in locked-in state, i.e. people with severe paralysis and communication problems. The main questions it aims to answer are efficient and stable control of Brain-Computer interface (BCI) functions for communication with attempted hand movements and operation of a keyword-based speech BCI. Participants will be implanted with four electrode grids, with in total 128 electrodes, on the surface of the brain and a connector on the skull. Participation includes visits of researchers for recording and training at home, 2-3 times per week for one year. Extension of participation after one year is possible. If successful, the participant will be able to use the BCI at home independently, without the presence of a researcher.
This is an observational study in patients who require clinical anesthesia. The main purpose of this study is to understand whether there are differences in the cerebral blood flow, and oxygen metabolism affected by different types of anesthesia. Subjects who require clinical anesthesia for a clinical MRI and for whom the use of anesthetics for the exam are in clinical equipoise are asked to join the study. All eligible subjects will be asked to provide informed consent before participating in the study.
The main objective is to assess the feasibility of collecting and implementing a multidimensional evaluation in a sample of patients with a mild to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their relatives, evaluated at 6 months (primary outcome), and at 12 then 18 months post-injury (secondary outcomes).
The goal of this observational study is to test the association between baseline ventilatory parameters (in particular mechanical power (MP), mechanical power normalized to predicted body weight (MP/PBW) and driving pressure (DP) with the baseline neurological status (assessed through the Glasgow coma score) in adults patients under mechanical ventilation with acute neurological injury secondary to stroke, brain trauma or subarachnoid hemorrhage. The main question[s]it aims to answer are: 1. In patients with acute neurological injury under mechanical ventilation, is there a correlation between the acute neurological injury, assessed using the Glasgow scale on admission, and baseline ventilatory parameters? 2. In patients with acute neurological injury under mechanical ventilation, are the baseline ventilatory parameters altered at baseline?