View clinical trials related to Bradycardia.
Filter by:This is an open label, interventional, feasibility, prospective, multicenter, clinical trial of lead extraction. The Xtrac O.S. system is intended for transvenous removal of pacing or defibrillator leads, having an inner lumen, through a superior approach. A total of 15 patients, who are scheduled for CIED lead extraction, will be recruited in order to ensure a total of at least 10 patients finishing the study procedures and follow up.
The purpose of this coverage with evidence development (CED) study is to evaluate complications and long-term health outcomes of the single-chamber Aveir Atrial Leadless Pacemaker device (aka Aveir™ AR LP system).
The study is a non-randomized, active prospective observational study permitting to report the behavior of Micra AV pacemaker during an exercise. Only patients who were previously implanted with a Micra MC1AVR01 can be enrolled in the study. Exercise test is part of the standard clinical care practice for this patients population during the first year follow-up.
A prospective, multinational, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a novel atrioventricular interval modulation (AVIM) algorithm downloaded into a previously implanted dual-chamber Medtronic Astra/Azure DR MRI IPG.
The primary study objective is to evaluate the feasibility, initial clinical safety and potential effectiveness of the Calyan Pacemaker system.
Guidelines for patients having first-time implants advocate that even when heart function is only mildly impaired, modern pacing approaches should be utilised to avoid the potentially damaging effects of RV pacing to preventing symptoms from pacing induced or worsened cardiomyopathy. However, once a traditional (RV) pacemaker is implanted, development of impaired heart function does not prompt a device upgrade. Even at the end of battery life, physicians simply replace it like-for-like. This trial tests whether such patients have better symptoms and quality of life if changed to a modern physiological pacing strategy from the traditional RV pacing approach. In this crossover trial, participants will be upgraded to a physiological pacing strategy. After their procedure, they will have a one-month run-in period to recover from the procedure (their pacemaker will be programmed to continued RV pacing). They will be have 2 one-month blinded time periods, randomised to physiological pacing or right ventricular pacing alternately. They will subsequently undergo two six-month blinded randomised time periods. Patients will document symptoms monthly on a mobile phone application or computer. At the end of each time period, they will have measurements of heart function, a walking test and quality-of-life questionnaires including the SF-36 questionnaire. The investigators hypothesise that upgrading to physiological pacing strategies will improve patients' quality of life.
The purpose of the China CIED 3.0T MRI Performance Study is to confirm safety of SureScan CIED in the clinical 3.0T MRI environment when subjects receive MRI scans. ll subjects will have required follow-up visits at baseline, MRI visit, 1-month post-MRI. The MRI scans will occur at the MRI visit. The MRI scan region will be determined by investigator according to the subject's clinical condition.
The study is designed as an open-label, prospective, international, multicenter, non-randomized study to determine safety and product performance of the CE-marked Amvia/Solvia pacemaker family, including the aATP, CRT AutoAdapt and Early Check features in the setting of a post-market clinical follow-up study.
The study is intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific INGEVITY+ cardiac pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch area (LBBA).
Study Title: Pacing characteristics of a conventional bipolar, active fixation pacing lead for left bundle branch area pacing in patients with symptomatic bradycardia Study Objectives: To characterize an approach for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with bradycardia indications for pacing and to assess implant success rate, safety, and long-term stability with a conventional bipolar, active fixation pacing lead. Methodology: Open-label, prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm study Study Endpoints: Primary Endpoint: • Implant success rate Secondary Endpoints: - Intra-operative procedure time and fluoroscopic exposure time - Intra-operative intracardiac electrogram (EGM) changes: paced QRS duration, stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time, and LBB potential - Post-operative imaging data: posteroanterior, left anterior oblique 30O, right anterior oblique 30O, Left lateral views - Serial paced 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and intracardiac EGM changes: QRS duration (QRSd), pacing-QRS interval, and new atrial fibrillation (AF) - Serial echocardiography changes: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial (LA) and LV chamber size, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) of tissue Doppler imaging - Serial changes of pacing parameters: capture threshold, impedance, and sensing amplitude for both atrial and ventricular Solia S leads - Safety: Immediate (< 24 hours), in-hospital, and chronic (12 months) adverse events