View clinical trials related to Bipolar Disorder.
Filter by:The study intervention is DBT adapted for youth with and/or at familial risk for bipolar disorder. Participants will have completed one full year of DBT in a previous study. This study is examining use of booster sessions. It is delivered in the form of individual sessions and skills sessions, based on the preference of the study participant. The study participant may also receive skills coaching via phone. There is no standard reference therapy/comparator against which the study intervention is being compared.
For patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), a single low dose of intravenous (IV) ketamine can help relieve symptoms as quickly as 24 hours later. The main problem with IV ketamine for TRD is that the effect is short-lived, lasting only days to 1 or 2 weeks. Furthermore, IV ketamine is a resource-intensive treatment, and the safety of long-term, repeated use for depression is unknown. To provide this treatment in a safe and cost-effective way, Investigators must allocate it efficiently to those patients who have the greatest need and probability of benefit. Therefore, this project aims to find clinical features (signs, symptoms, and parts of a patient's history) that will help predict which patients are most likely to respond to a single dose of IV ketamine for TRD. This will help guide patient selection and triaging. Investigators will recruit 40 participants with TRD over one year, and randomize them to one of two conditions (ketamine followed by an active placebo 3-weeks later, or vice versa). With clinical data collected through detailed interviews, questionnaires, actigraphy, speech sampling, electroencephalography (EEG), and computerized tasks, this study design will let us evaluate how well such factors predict (A) rapid response at 24-hours, and (B) sustained response at 7 and 14 days.
The goal of this clinical trial is to conduct a randomized double-blind controlled trial to explore the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of manic episode (ME) and analyzes the brain functional connectivity to construct the therapeutic effect prediction model of tDCS for ME. The main questions it aims to answer are: - A randomized double-blind controlled trial is conducted to clarify the efficacy and safety of tDCS combined with pharmacological treatments in the ME. - A therapeutic effect prediction model of tDCS for ME by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to evaluate brain function. Participants will be receive: - clinical data interview and clinical symptom assessment. - the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to analysis brain functional connectivity. - tDCS stimulation, which was performed once a day sessions of active or sham anodal tDCS to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Cathode to the left OFC (2 mA, 20 minutes, 10 sessions). In the active group, current stimulations were gradually ramped up to 2 mA (in 30 seconds) intensity for 20 minutes, once a day, for 10 days. For sham stimulation, the procedure was identical, except that the current was gradually ramped up to 2mA and rapidly down to zero (in 30 seconds), thus leading to the same initial sensations of tDCS.
At present, diagnosis and recognition of depression and bipolar disorder are mainly based on subjective evidence such as clinical interview and scale evaluation. The corresponding diagnosis basis has some shortcomings, such as poor diagnostic reliability and failure in early identification of bipolar disorder. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore objective diagnostic indicators to remedy the deficiencies. Therefore，the investigators collect psychological and physiological information data of patients with bipolar disorder and depression.Then the investigators aim to construct and verify the multidimensional emotion recognition model to analyze the personality characteristics, negative emotions and cognitive reactions of different individuals, and form a systematic accurate recognition and evaluation tool.
Differentiation between major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) as soon as possible in the patient journey represents a major clinical issue. When the patient is in a depressive phase, the symptoms are similar between the two pathologies and the current clinical scales fail in distinguishing them. Physicians often report this difficulty and as a consequence, the mean time from onset to bipolar disorder diagnosis is currently 7.5 years. These diagnostic delays and misdiagnosis lead to damaging consequences for patients and their loved ones: worsening of symptoms, comorbidities, suicide risk and inadequate care resulting in severe impairment in social and occupational functioning. Faced with these high expectations for accurate diagnostic methods for an earlier management of psychiatric patients, the combination of relevant clinical features and biomarkers could stand for a solution, leading to a personalised approach in patients with mood disorders. In a first clinical discovery study, a panel of RNA biomarkers in the blood of patients with a major depressive episode (MDE) has been identified, allowing to differentiate bipolar disorder from MDD (unipolar depression). These biomarkers are based on RNA modifications, namely RNA editing, that could be identified using molecular biology, NGS and artificial intelligence. This panel constitutes EDIT-B test, which is based on Alcediag's proprietary and patented biomarkers and algorithms. The present study aims to validate the biomarker signatures proposed by Alcediag by measuring the association between the modifications of the RNA editing and major depressive disorder/ bipolar disorder diagnosis, in patients with a MDE in real-life setting pilot centres.
Schizophrenia, bipolar and major depressive disorders collectively affect over 10 million people across the EU and are associated with annual healthcare and societal costs in excess of 100 billion Euros. When diagnosed with one of these disorders, patients are prescribed psychotropic medication such as antidepressants, mood stabilisers or antipsychotics. It is unknown whether this first-line treatment will be successful. After this first-line treatment fails, usually a second-line treatment is initiated, and when this is not successful either a third-line treatment is initiated. Third-line treatments are quite successful, especially when compared to second-line treatments. The research question is whether the third-line treatments (early-intensified treatments) would be more efficacious than the current second-line treatments (treatment as usual) for schizophrenia, bipolar and major depressive disorders. If this is indeed the case, this could lead to the prevention of unnecessary trials of ineffective treatments and adaptations of worldwide guidelines as well as a reduction of healthcare and societal costs.
One in five people will present a major depressive episode (MDE) in their lifetime. While antidepressants (ADs) are currently the standard treatment for MDE, the first AD prescribed is effective in less than 40% of patients and a complete clinical response is only observed after several weeks. Identifying early biomarkers of the response to treatment with an AD could allow the clinician to rapidly identify patients in whom treatment will not be effective and therefore modify patient care. We have recently shown that the messenger RNA (mRNA) of two proteins, ELK1 and GPR56, were present in different amounts in the blood cells of "responder" compared to those of "non-respondent" patients. In this context, our main objective will be to determine whether ELK1 and GPR56 mRNAs, are very early biomarkers of the response to AD, i.e., biomarkers whose variation precedes the clinical response by several weeks. Secondary objectives will be to identify early phase changes in neurophysiological measures, cognitive and behavioral tasks, as well as levels of blood coding and non-coding RNAs, serum cytokine, mitochondrial and metabolic markers, neuroimaging markers as biomarkers of differential treatment outcomes to antidepressant treatment. Patients will be treated with SERTRALINE or FLUOXETINE or DULOXETINE or MAPROTILINE (in monotherapy) with or without adjunct benzodiazepine. Patients are identified as responders or non-responders based on their clinical assessment at 8 weeks after treatment onset. In addition, a second stage will collect data to address another important issue for the management of patients with a MDE: to discriminate those with a major depressive disorder (MDD) from those with a bipolar disorder (BD). BD diagnosis is one of the most common reasons of failure to response to ADs. Therefore, one of our secondary objectives will be to identify biomarkers to differentiate between these two categories of patients. To do this, we will follow patients for a period of 24 months to identify those who will present during this follow-up the diagnostic criteria of bipolarity.
Suicide is a major public health concern, particularly among Veterans with serious mental illness (SMI, i.e., psychotic disorders or bipolar disorders). Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) is a well-established evidence-based practice for those with SMI that centers on identifying warning signs of mental illness, developing wellness tools for functional independence, planning for day-to-day effective living within one's community, and building an action plan to create a valued life worth living. This proposed study will refine and pilot SUicide Prevention by Peers Offering Recovery Tactics (SUPPORT), a novel integrated recovery program that is an adaptation of peer-delivered WRAP for Veterans with SMI. In SUPPORT, a Peer Specialist leads a Veteran at increased risk for suicide through recovery planning that is tailored to the Veteran's suicidal experiences with cognitive learning strategies to enhance safety plan recall and improve functioning.
Current research on the pathogenesis of depression shows that imbalanced inflammatory factors are closely related to Major Depressive Disorder(MDD). As reported, physical exercise, Ω-3 fatty acids, and sulforaphane can be complementary therapies for moderate-to-severe depression. In addition, imaging studies have found changes in the structure and functional connectivity of the brain. Therefore, this study intends to collect clinical and biological information from patients with depression and healthy controls to establish a multi-factor model for early warning and diagnosis of major depressive disorder
The objective of this project is to determine the concordance between the subjective and objective evaluation of cognitive functions in affective patients in partial remission through scales and cognitive tests that would be easily implemented in the different mental health care devices. This is a cross-sectional case-control study of non-probabilistic sampling, which will include a group of patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder and a group of healthy controls from the same population and matched by age, gender and years of education with the group of patients. Patients will be recruited from the psychiatric service of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau who meet the inclusion criteria, and they will undergo a blood draw, a clinical assessment, a complete neuropsychological examination together with scales of subjective perception of cognitive deficit, a measure of cognitive reserve and an evaluation of psychosocial functionality. In addition, the same evaluation will be made to a group of healthy subjects.The total sample will be 120