View clinical trials related to Biliary Tract Cancer.
Filter by:This is a Phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of TT-00420 tablet, as monotherapy or in combination regimens, in patients with advanced solid tumors (solid tumor, BTC and TNBC).
First-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic advanced biliary tract cancer and the optimal duration of the treatment is not mentioned in current clinical guidelines. In the pivotal phase 3 ABC-02 trial, patients received up to 6 to 8 cycles of treatment and stopped without maintenance and our retrospective study shows no significant benefit of continuing gemcitabine plus cisplatin beyond 6 to 8 cycles. However, the survival outcomes of patients who completed 6 to 8 cycles of gemcitabine plus cisplatin without progression are dismal with progression-free survival from the last dose of the treatment of median 5.2 months in a prior retrospective study. Indeed, there is an unmet clinical need in terms of maintenance therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer without progression to first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy. Durvalumab with/without tremelimumab, anti-CTLA4 inhibitor, showed encouraging results in recently presented study for treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Combination of olaparib and durvalumab showed promising results for metastatic HER-2 negative BRCA mutated breast cancer. For DDR gene mutated advanced biliary tract cancer, olaparib plus durvalumab combination may show synergistic effect with better efficacy than olaparib monotherapy. Both olaparib and durvalumab are relatively well tolerated compared to other cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Olaparib may have some degree of myelosuppression, most patients are expected to well tolerate. Although combination of durvalumab and olaparib may cause additional adverse events, these also might be tolerable, considering that there are no overlapping toxicities between durvalumab and olaparib and the safety data for the combination of durvalumab with olaparib. Considering poor prognosis in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer and lack of maintenance treatment following scheduled first-line GemCis, clinical benefits with maintenance olaparib or olaparib plus durvalumab weigh more than the potential risks.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the ability to recruit and retain participants, and to successfully conduct a psilocybin-based protocol, for a study of the treatment of distress related to inoperable pancreatobilliary cancer. Secondary objectives include pre/post, and longitudinal measurement of distress in intervention participants and a paired family member who is in an observational arm.
No validated biomarkers exist that can identify patients with biliary tract cancer at an early stage or predict treatment outcomes. The objective of the present study is to find diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers.
The primary objective are: To assess the safety and tolerability of the combination of D07001-softgel capsules and Xeloda/TS-1. To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of D07001-softgel capsules and Xeloda/TS-1, as assessed by disease control rate (DCR).
A Phase Ⅱ, open-label, single-arm study to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Surufatinib Combination With Toripalimab in Patients With Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancer.
The main objective of the study is to establish if patients with advanced bile duct cancer, who have already received a line of treatment for their disease, will receive any associated benefits from the combination of mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab and atezolizumab as a second-line therapy All patients who meet the criteria to participate in the study shall receive the following drugs intravenously every 14 days: mFOLFOX6 combined with Atezolizumab 840 mg and Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. These drugs will be administered until one of the following situations arises: disease progress, intolerable side effects, pregnancy or if the patient or the doctor decide to stop the treatment. Atezolizumab is an antibody that operates on an important receptor of the immune system (PD1/PD-L1 axis). Atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) has already been approved in a number of countries to treat a range of tumours, although it has not yet been approved for bile duct tumours. Bevacizumab is an antibody that is joined to the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab was approved for the first time in the USA in 2004 and is now approved in over 100 countries around the world for a variety of conditions. However, it has not yet been approved for treating bile duct cancers. mFOLFOX6 is a chemotherapy regime used to treat many kinds of gastrointestinal tumours, including bile duct cancer, since it is a treatment approved for this type of tumour. The combination of mFOLFOX6 with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (trial drugs), may bring more information about an anti-tumour immune response that could improve the results of mFOLFOX6, which backs up the research on this treatment combination with cancer patients.
In patients with cancer, resistance training appears to be a safe and effective exercise modality to increase both lean muscle mass and strength, as well as attenuates cancer-related fatigue. It may serve as a feasible intervention in these patients to mitigate cachexia, especially if implemented before the onset of cancer cachexia or in a pre-cachectic state. This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that will compare a blood flow restricted resistance training intervention during the pre- (prehabilitation) and post-operative (rehabilitation) phase in patients with pancreatic, biliary tract and liver cancer, versus usual care on skeletal muscle and other health-related outcomes.
This open-label, First-into-Human (FIH) study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and early efficacy of AVA6000, a FAP-activated pro-drug of doxorubicin, in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic solid tumours. In Phase Ia, using a 3+3 design, escalating doses of AVA6000 will be administered to patients with a range of solid tumour types to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). In Phase 1b, the selected RP2D dose will be assessed in one to three tumour types.
The objective of this study is to identify prognosis and predictive markers of response to treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy,loco-regional treatments ) in patients with bile duct cancer. The effectiveness and tolerance of these treatments in current practice will also be evaluated.