Clinical Trials Logo

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04566588 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Early Apical Release vs Classic Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Post-Operative Incontinence Rates and Surgical Outcomes

HoLEP EAR
Start date: June 25, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To determine if early apical release holmium enucleation of the prostate (EAR HoLEP), as a surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, reduces post-operative urinary incontinence compared to classic HoLEP.

NCT ID: NCT04563221 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Start date: May 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a single center, prospective, investigational study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Embolization will be performed with LC Bead LUMI particles using a balloon occlusion microcatheter or standard microcatheter.

NCT ID: NCT04529369 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Middle Lobe Only Laser Vaporization or Total Prostate Vaporization of the Prostate, Prospective Cohort Study

Start date: October 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigator aims to prospectively investigate the efficacy and durability of the middle lobe only versus traditional complete photoselective greenlight vaporization of the prostate in patients with prominent middle lobe. The investigator will select patients based on pre-op cystoscopy if patients have a prominent middle lobe to participate in this study. Researches will start to vaporize only the middle lobe then, at the end of this step, The investigator will look at the verumontanum into the prostatic fossa and determine if the patient is having adequate opened prostatic fossa or not. Patients with unsatisfactory opened fossa will have a complete PVP of lateral lobes, while patients with a satisfactory channel will not receive a complete PVP. Primary objectives of the study are to look into pre and post-operative uroflowmetry and post-void residual, International prostate symptoms scores, need of catheterization, and need for secondary interventions over five then ten years. Secondary objectives are to look into erectile and ejaculatory status using the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) and MSHQ-EjD Short Form for Assessing EjD. Researchers will follow the patients at three months, six months, one year then yearly for five years then an extension to up to 10 years.

NCT ID: NCT04471155 Completed - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation Prostatectomy and Open Transvesical Prostatectomy in Large Prostate

Start date: April 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

comparison of holmium laser enucleation prostatectomy and open prostatectomy regarding safety and efficacy in men with prostate larger than 80 grams

NCT ID: NCT04446429 Completed - Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials

Anti-Androgen Treatment for COVID-19

Start date: October 21, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is intended to explore the possible protective role of anti-androgens in SARS-CoV-2 infection

NCT ID: NCT04391114 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) vs the Traditional HoLEP for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Start date: October 15, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the non-malignant enlargement of the prostate gland, places pressure on the urethra and causes urination difficulties and bladder problems. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH is a common condition in aging men, with an overall prevalence of more than 50% in those older than 50 years of age. Men with LUTS often experience sexual dysfunction including ejaculatory loss, painful ejaculation, and erectile dysfunction, which among other complications can also lead to a decreased quality of life. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), first reported by Fraundorfer et al in 1998, is a more recent step in the evolution of holmium laser prostatectomy. HOLEP offers patients the alternative of being treated endoscopically with minimal blood loss, short catheterization time, and decreased hospital stay. One noted drawback to HoLEP, and the primary reason why it has yet to become the new standard for treatment of symptomatic BPH, is the complexity of this procedure, with a prolonged learning curve. Modifications to the procedure have thus been explored in order to address this limitation. The "Top-Down" HoLEP technique is a novel technique which offers potential benefits to the Traditional HoLEP procedure, including decreased complexity, a reduced learning curve, with anticipated improved continence. This study will compare the operating time between the Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and the Traditional HoLEP for the treatment of patients with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction due to BPH in Northwestern Ontario.

NCT ID: NCT04386941 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Greenlight Vaporization vs Xpeeda Vaporesection

Start date: July 31, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common problem, which impact patients' quality of life. It may lead to serious outcomes, including urinary tract infection, hematuria, bladder stones, urinary retention, hydronephrosis, and rarely renal insufficiency. Introduction of the Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) represented a turning point in minimally invasive laser therapy for BPH as it achieves size-independent prostatic cavities similar to simple open prostatectomy with significantly lower perioperative morbidity. Recently, Holmium Xpeeda side firing fibre was introduced and it stands apart from other available technologies as a combination of power and efficiency, which minimizes vaporization time. This technology seems to revolutionize utilization of the Holmium power and delivering more energy directly to the tissue, due to its capability of being in contact with the tissue. To date, no outcomes of the new Xpeeda laser fiber have been reported in the literature, which is striving for trials comparing XPS 180W with other competitors such as Holmium vaporesection with the new fiber Xpeeda. Therefore, this study is planned to compare both procedures in improving bothersome LUTS secondary to BPH, and to evaluate safety and cost effectiveness.

NCT ID: NCT04352257 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Bladder and Prostate Sonomorphology in Patients With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Start date: April 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Bladder and Prostate Sonomorphology in Patients With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

NCT ID: NCT04340934 Terminated - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

The Use of REZUM System in Chinese Male Patients With LUTS Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement

Start date: May 13, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Men with enlarged prostates commonly experience lower urinary tract symptoms and may go on to develop complications such as acute urinary retention (AUR). Surgery is the standard treatment option required to remove the enlarged prostates and to rectify such complications. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was first performed over 80 years ago and is still regarded as the "gold standard" for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) in prostates between 30 and 80ml. While TURP results in an improvement in symptoms, perioperative morbidity and long-term complications can include postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence, urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction. Rezūm is a system uses water steam energy to remove the particular part of the prostate that enlarges and causes symptoms due to BPH. Rezum involves a radiofrequency (RF) generator system and an endoscopic device that is introduced into the body via the urethra. Radiofrequency energy from the generator will heat up a controlled amount of water inside the system and converting the water into vapour or steam. The thermal energy created outside the body is delivered into the prostate tissue through the tiny needle at the tip of the endoscopic device. Small amount of steam will then be injected into the tissue and energy will be released during the conversion of steam to water. The energy will heat up the prostate tissue and result in gradually removal of the targeted obstructive prostate tissue. The treatment procedure takes approximately 3-7 minutes and can be performed as day surgery. No radiofrequency energy is delivered into the body, other than the prostate. Throughout the procedure normal saline (salty water) is running into the urethra through the scope to help ensure better views and to prevent the urethra from overheating. Voiding symptom will gradually improve after the procedure. From clinical study based in Caucasian population, patients had improved urinary flow rate by on average 50% and also improvement in quality of life scores. The treatment results could last for at least 4 years. However, information regarding the use of Rezum in Chinese and Asian is lacking. This study is proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rezum in our population.

NCT ID: NCT04338776 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Comparing UroLift Experience Against Rezūm

CLEAR
Start date: January 22, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

C.L.E.A.R. Study is poised to compare the patient experience post procedure, including catheterization needs as well as retreatment and BPH medication rates following treatment with either the UroLift® System or Rezūm™ System through 12 months.