View clinical trials related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Filter by:The objectives of the trial are to demonstrate the safety and performance of the Zenflow Spring System in relieving the symptoms of obstructive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
A dual-arm prospective, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and performance of obtaining hemostasis with catheters along with the use or absence of a hemostatic agent following treatment with the AQUABEAM System.
The study is being conducted to learn why some patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) do not respond to a commonly used treatment drug, Finasteride. The hope is to find ways to predict which patients will not respond to Finasteride so that, in the future, these patients can be identified prior to offering this treatment and they can be offered alternative treatment strategies in its place. The aim is to see if noninvasive techniques such as MRI can detect inflammation of the prostate to assist with early detection of those who will and who will not respond to Finasteride.
This registry study is designed to collect data on the procedural success and complication rates in real-world patients undergoing HydroPearl embolization procedures via radial access.
UDS evaluates the impact of Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) as measured by pressure flow, urodynamic testing (UDS) and an optional UroCuff Testing, an alternative urodynamic test. In addition, standard BPH measures such as symptoms, qualify of life, uroflowmetry, and post void residual will be evaluated at screening and at the follow-up visits.
A prospective single centre study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using contrast enhanced ultrasound and echogenic embolic agent Ekobi Embolization Microspheres in Prostate Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) has proven to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). New laser technologies such as the Moses Pulse laser system provide for improved energy delivery which may decrease blood loss and operative time. We seek to evaluate Moses technology for enucleation of the prostate in the setting of BPH.
This study compares safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated wit benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate Ga-68 MAA distribution on PET/MRI after injection into the prostatic arteries in patients without prostate cancer who are being treated with prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Participants: Study subjects will be 5 men scheduled to undergo the PAE procedure at UNC Hospital for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Procedures (methods): Study subjects will undergo PAE using the standard technique. Prior to embolization of the prostatic artery with the bland embolic agent, Ga-68 MAA will be injected. Standard departmental radiation protection procedures will be followed. After the PAE procedure is complete, the patient will be transported to the UNC Biomedical Research Imaging Center to undergo PET/MRI.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate improvement of symptoms from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for prostate artery embolization (PAE) with microspheres (Embozene™, 400µm) compared to conventional Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).