Clinical Trials Logo

Barotrauma clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Barotrauma.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06209021 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Middle Ear Barotrauma

Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Middle and Inner Ear Functions

HBOT
Start date: January 2024
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The goal of this observational study is to measure the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on middle ear pressure in order to predict the risk factors for middle ear barotrauma also, to assess its effects on hearing functions of the inner ear in participant population. The main questions aim to answer are: - Is there a change in middle ear pressure before and after exposure to hyperbaric oxygen therapy ? - Is there a change in hearing threshold level before and after exposure to hyperbaric oxygen therapy ? The middle ear pressure, eustachian tube functions and the hearing threshold of the participants will be assessed immediately before the fist session and within one hour after the first and tenth sessions.

NCT ID: NCT06001645 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Laboratory Biomarkers and Pulmonary Interstitial Emphysema in ARDS (PIE-ARDS)

PIE-ARDS
Start date: November 27, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Barotrauma (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum) is a well-described complication of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), especially in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (16.1% in COVID-19, and about 6% in non-COVID-19 ARDS). Macklin effect was recently discovered by our group as an accurate radiological predictor of barotrauma in COVID-19 ARDS; the Investigators also found that density histograms automatically extracted from chest CT images provide a reliable insight into lung composition . Since lung frailty is a major issue also in non-COVID-19 ARDS, the Investigators want to confirm the predictive role of Macklin effect also in this setting. In addition, the Investigators aim to explore inflammatory profiling to decipher different biological aspects of the same clinical issue. Finally, the Investigators want to develop a specific management algorithm for patients diagnosed, according to our findings, with a specific ARDS sub phenotype characterized by increased lung frailty

NCT ID: NCT05877443 Completed - COVID-19 Clinical Trials

Barotrauma in Adults With Critical COVID-19

Start date: March 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

During the pandemic of COVID-19, studies reporting a high incidence of barotrauma, both pneumothorax but also pneumomediastinum, in patients with critical COVID-19. If this is complications of the respiratory support used to treat patients hypoxemia or if it is a direct consequence of COVID-19 damaging the lung tissue is not known. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence and type barotrauma, if there is an association between barotrauma and level of respiratory support used in the intensive care unit, and if barotrauma is associated with worse outcome compared to patients without barotrauma.

NCT ID: NCT05816954 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Imaging Biomarkers to Stratify the Risk of Barotrauma in ARDS

FRAIL ARDS
Start date: August 30, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The high incidence of barotrauma in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (16.1%, with a mortality rate >60%) provides rationale for considering COVID-19 ARDS a paradigm for lung frailty. The investigators recently discovered that the Macklin effect is an impressive radiological predictor of barotrauma in COVID-19 ARDS. Since lung frailty is a major issue also in non-COVID-19 ARDS (6% barotrauma, with a mortality rate of 46% ) the investigators want to confirm the importance of Macklin effect in non-COVID-19 ARDS. Using artificial intelligence-based approaches the investigators also want to identify imaging biomarkers to non-invasively assess lung frailty in a mixed cohort of COVID-19/non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. Furthermore, the investigators want to prospectively validate these biomarkers in a cohort of ARDS patients. This will provide a therapeutic algorithm for ARDS patients at high-risk for barotrauma, identifying those most likely to benefit from hyper protective strategies.

NCT ID: NCT05697328 Recruiting - Barotrauma Clinical Trials

Barotrauma in Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

HBOT
Start date: January 31, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this research is to study whether the use of pseudoephedrine can help prevent middle ear trauma during HBOT. Pseudoephedrine is an approved drug that is used for temporary relief of nasal or sinus pain and pressure.

NCT ID: NCT05216523 Completed - COVID-19 Clinical Trials

"Barotrauma in Admitted Covid-19 Cases - A Single Center Retrospective Study"

BARCOV
Start date: June 24, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

A retrospective study is planned to find out the incidence and association type of respiratory support with barotrauma in Covid-19 cases admitted in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. As widely known, Covid-19 affects the respiratory system primarily and is the main cause of admission to hospital. Depending upon the severity, different levels of respiratory support are offered to the patients. Normally patients with viral/bacterial respiratory diseases have a low incidence of barotrauma. Since this disease is new and it has been observed that a significant number of covid-19 patients develop barotrauma, hence it is deemed worthwhile to investigate the matter. All the patients admitted to the ward, high dependency unit, and intensive care unit will be scanned and those who developed barotrauma (pneumothorax, surgical emphysema, pneumo-pericardium, and pneumo-mediastinum) will be studied in detail and analyzed. This review is expected to highlight the problem and etiology and we might be able to suggest a management strategy to deal with this problem.

NCT ID: NCT04859881 Completed - Covid19 Clinical Trials

Risk Factors for Barotrauma in COVID-19

Start date: April 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Barotrauma in mechanical ventilation (MV) is defined as lung damage attributable to the application of high airway pressure and is one of the potential mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Previous studies have shown an increased mortality in patients with barotrauma under MV; pneumothorax (PTX) being the most common presentation, but it can also present as pneumomediastinum (PM) with or without PTX, with extension to soft tissue as subcutaneous emphysema or even as pneumo-retroperitoneum and pneumo-scrotum. Traditionally, underlying lung disease or age are known risk factors for non-trauma related barotrauma. However, in patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the incidence of this complication is more common than in non-infected patients, as recently reported. Since little is known regarding which are the main risk factors for these events to develop, most pathophysiological mechanisms remain unexplained. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for developing barotrauma in patients under MV with COVID-19 associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Secondary objectives were to determine the incidence of barotrauma and its association with mortality.

NCT ID: NCT04804098 Recruiting - Pressure Injury Clinical Trials

Effect of Rate (Slope) of Compression on the Incidence of Symptomatic ETD and MEB: a Phase III Prospective Study.

Start date: September 20, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and middle ear barotrauma (MEB) are common reported complications during hyperbaric oxygen treatment. The Phase I study data was the first to demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in the occurrence of symptomatic ETD and middle ear barotrauma (MEB). The Phase I Trial suggested the total time interval and rate (slope) of compression (ROC) may be a determining factor in ETD and MEB. This Phase II study investigates an optimal total time interval and rate of compression to reduce ETD and MEB when considering each multiplace treatment (with multiple patients) as the unit of observation collectively as a group, rather than for each individual patient. Data will be collected prospectively on group patient-treatment exposures. Our investigators randomly assign patient-treatment group exposures to two different rates (slopes) of compression. These are limited to the linear versus the non-linear rates (slopes) of compression identical to two of four compression profiles used in the Phase I and Phase II trials. All patients experiencing symptoms of ETD and MEB requiring compression stops will be evaluated post treatment to confirm the presence of ETD and MEB using the O'Neill Grading System (OGS). Data will be analyzed using the IBM-SPSS statistical software program. The number of compression holds observed in each of the compression schedules/compression profiles using an identical 15-minute total time interval of compression but varying in the rate (slope) of compression will be recorded as in the Phase I and II studies. Symptomatic patients who required compression stops (as in the Phase I trial) using a USN TT 9 during elective hyperbaric oxygen treatments in a Class A multiplace hyperbaric chamber will be compared. Statistical analysis using descriptive and Inferential statistics will be applied to the patients requiring first stops in the compression profiles. This will be used to further evaluate the data restricted to the rate of compression (linear vs. non-linear) and whether this is associated with the number of compression holds. The 15-minute total time interval of compression will be identical in both compression profiles studied since this was found to be the total time interval of compression with the least number of treatment stops/holds in the phase I and phase II studies.

NCT ID: NCT04776967 Completed - Pressure Injury Clinical Trials

Effect of Total Compression Time and Rate (Slope) on Incidence of Symptomatic ETD and MEB: A Phase II Prospective Study.

Start date: September 8, 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and middle ear barotrauma (MEB) are common reported complications during hyperbaric oxygen treatment. The Phase I study data was the first to demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in the occurrence of symptomatic ETD and middle ear barotrauma (MEB). The Phase I Trial suggested the total time interval and rate (slope) of compression (ROC) may be a determining factor in ETD and MEB. This Phase II study investigates an optimal total time interval and rate of compression to reduce ETD and MEB when considering each multiplace treatment (with multiple patients) as the unit of observation collectively as a group, rather than for each individual patient. Data will be collected prospectively on group patient-treatment exposures. The investigators randomly assigned patient-treatment group exposures to four different time interval and rate (slope) of compression. These total time intervals of compression and rates (slopes) of compression are identical to those used in the Phase I trial. All patients experiencing symptoms of ETD and MEB requiring compression stops will be evaluated post treatment to confirm the presence of ETD and MEB using the O'Neill Grading System (OGS). Data will be analyzed using the IBM-SPSS statistical software program. The number of compression holds observed in each of the 4 compression schedules, similar to ther Phase I trial will be recorded. Patients who are symptomatic and require compression stops (as in the Phase I trial) using a United States Navy Treatment Table 9 (USN-TTN9) during elective hyperbaric oxygen treatments in a Class A multiplace hyperbaric chamber will be analyzed. Analysis using descriptive and inferential statistics will be applied to the patients requiring first stops in the 4 compression profiles. This Phase II study increases the sample size of treatments and they will be combined with the total number of treatments used in the original phase I study. This will increase power to facilitate detailed descriptive analysis and to determine if the findings are robust in the phase I study.

NCT ID: NCT04726306 Enrolling by invitation - Pressure Injury Clinical Trials

Diagnostic Precision and Accuracy Using the Teed Scoring System Versus the O'Neill Grading System

OGS
Start date: February 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This validation study investigates the diagnostic precision and accuracy when grading otic barotrauma using two alternative gradings systems including the TEED and the OGS grading systems. Background There are two grading systems used to grade otic barotrauma. They include the Teed Score (TEED) and the O'Neill Grading System (OGS). Teed has been utilized more extensively but among physicians has been found to have limitations. The OGS is an alternative grading system with less classification categories than what the Teed classification system utilizes. The OGS system is tied directly to treatment decision making, specific to the respective grading level. Methods This study will utilize a sample of clinical examiners who will independently grade 120 digital color photos of actual patient tympanic membranes with and without evidence of eustachian tube dysfunction and middle ear barotrauma including variable stages or grades of otic barotrauma. They will use the TEED chart as a reference in selecting the appropriate TEED score for each of the photos. Simultaneously they will also utilize the OGS chart as a reference in selecting the appropriate OGS grade for each of the photos. The grading will be conducted by physicians, nurses, and technicians. This will allow for comparisons at varying provider levels. The comparisons will be made using the kappa statistics across the disciplines. This will allow comparison between observed agreement, and expected agreement due to chance for all reviewers. Research Hypothesis Ho: There is no difference in diagnostic precision and accuracy when grading otic barotrauma between clinical examiners using either the TEED or OGS grading systems. Ha: There is a difference in diagnostic precision and accuracy when grading otic barotrauma between clinical examiners using either the TEED or OGS grading systems.