Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Assessment of Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Training According to the Concept of Kinetic Control in Treatment of Lumbar Spine and Knee Pain and in Reduction of Risk of Injury in Female Football Players
Verified date | September 2019 |
Source | Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The project aims to assess the effectiveness of neuromuscular training according to the
concept of Kinetic Control (KC) in prevention and treatment of lumbar spine and knee pain and
in reduction of risk of injury in female football players.
The study was designed as single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) and conducted on a
group of 18 female football players from University Club of the Academic Sports Association
of Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska. Participants were
randomly divided into two 9-person groups: A - used standard training and neuromuscular
training (Kinetic Control) and B - used only standard training.
Main hypothesis:
The application of neuromuscular therapy (KC) reduces the risk of injuries and pain of the
lumbar spine and the knee and improves the static and dynamic balance.
Research questions:
1. Will the application of the KC training reduce the risk and frequency of spine and knee
injuries in females football players?
2. Will the KC training lead to reduction of the intensity of lumbar spine and knee pain?
3. Will the application of the KC training lead to increase in the torque strength of knee
flexors and extensors and improved stability of the knee?
4. Will the application of the neuromuscular training (KC) lead to reduction of the
disability level and improved functional level?
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 18 |
Est. completion date | June 16, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | June 16, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 19 Years to 25 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - female players not taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for at least a week before the start of the study, - written consent for the participation in the study. Exclusion criteria: - female players with acute inflammation (neuralgia) and massive intervertebral disk herniation requiring a surgery, - female players who suffered from a lumbar spine and/or knee injury up to 6 months before the start of the study, - female players with acute knee inflammation and after knee surgeries. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Poland | Pope John Paul II State School Of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska | Biala Podlaska |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska |
Poland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) | Visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) evaluates intensity of pain in the scale from 0 to 10. Maximum score means the highest level of pain. | Visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) was carried out at the beginning of each season and after 6 months | |
Primary | Modified Laitinen's pain questionnaire | Laitinen's pain questionnaire took into account four indicators evaluated in the scale from 0 to 4: the intensity of pain, the frequency of its occurrence, the use of analgesic medications and limitation of the participant's motor activity. A research participant could have been granted from 0 to 16 points, the maximum score means the highest level of pain. | Modified Laitinen's pain questionnaire was carried out at the beginning of each season and after 6 months | |
Primary | Stratford's back pain functional scale (BPFS) | In Stratford's scale (BFPS), the research participants assessed twelve actions related to everyday life activity in the scale from 0 to 5. The result fell within a range from 0 to 60 points, where the higher final result, the lower level of pain. | Stratford's back pain functional scale (BPFS) was carried out at the beginning of each season and after 6 months | |
Secondary | Single leg small knee bend test | The test is performed in the standing position with feet a hip distance apart and parallel inner sides. The participant is then asked to transfer their body weight on one leg and raise the other leg over the ground. The body weight should be placed over the metatarsus. The participant is then asked to slightly bend the knee whilst keeping the heel on the ground. A photo is taken with a camera. Subsequently, computer software is used to determine the axis of the bent limb. The participant undergoes the test twice. If the test is not performed properly the first time, the participant is instructed how to perform the movement and the test is repeated. Proper test performance for the first time scores 2 points. Proper test performance after the guidance of the physical therapist scores 1 point and improper test performance twice scores 0 points. |
Single leg small knee bend test was carried out at the beginning of each season and after 6 months | |
Secondary | Tests on the GAMMA dynamometric platform | Assessment of the load of lower limbs in the standing position for 30 seconds with eyes open. 1-1.15 was assumed as the proper load distribution ratio. Assessment of the load of lower limbs in the standing position for 30 seconds with eyes closed. 1-1.15 was assumed as the proper load distribution ratio. Assessment of the load of lower limbs in the squat test. The platform marks the load of lower limbs in three phases - standing up, stabilisation and squatting. 1-1.15 was assumed as the proper load distribution ratio in each phase. Assessment of the load of lower limbs in the jumping test. The platform marks the load of lower limbs in three phases - jumping up, landing and stabilisation. 1-1.15 was assumed as the proper load distribution ratio in each phase. |
Tests on the GAMMA dynamometric platform were carried out at the beginning of each season and after 6 months | |
Secondary | Measurement of muscle force torque on a UPR-02A chair | The test was performed under isometric conditions and included two measurements of each muscle group, for both the left and the right lower limb. The tested limb was stabilised at the 30-degree bend at the knee in order to measure the flexors and at the 60-degree bend in order to measure the extensors, assuming the 0 degree angle as full extension at the knee. In addition, the torso and distal thighs were stabilised with a belt. During the test, upper limbs were crossed on the chest. The axis of the torque measuring device was placed at the level of the knee joint gap (joint rotation axis). The measurements were taken in the following sequence: extension of the right limb, flexion of the right limb, extension of the left limb and flexion of the left limb. | Measurement of muscle force torque on a UPR-02A chair were carried out at the beginning of each season and after 6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05982483 -
Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Usual Care for ED Patients With Mechanical Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04744246 -
Muscle Activity During Load Carriage in ROTC Cadets
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03680846 -
Comparison of HF10 Therapy Combined With CMM to CMM Alone in the Treatment of Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05597189 -
Clinical Study for Palliative/Preventive Treatment of Chronic Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05342181 -
Static and Dynamic Core Stability Exercises in Potpartum Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02955342 -
Back and Neck Pain in Adolescence
|
||
Completed |
NCT02704845 -
Biopsychosocial Exploration of Pain Profiles in Inflammatory and Chronic Non-specific Axial Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02536274 -
"Examination of the Impact of a Dynamic Flexion Orthosis (Dynaflex®Ottobock) or of a Back Bandage (Lumbo Sensa®Ottobock) on the Voluntary Activation of the Back Muscles in Patients With Specific Back Pain"
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02237105 -
The Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on the Outcome of Spinal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02485795 -
Observational Study of the Impact of Genetic Testing on Healthcare Decisions and Care in Interventional Pain Management
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02254694 -
The Influence of High Heeled Shoes on the Sagittal Balance of the Spine and Whole Body
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02239627 -
Epidural Clonidine Versus Corticosteroid for Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02609009 -
Back Pain and Spinal Manipulation in Adolescent Scoliosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00986180 -
NUCYNTA (Tapentadol Immediate Release) Versus Oxycodone Immediate Release in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00769626 -
Standardizing Management of Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care and Physical Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00771758 -
Tapentadol IR vs Oxycodone IR vs Placebo in Acute Pain From Vertebral Compression Fracture Associated With Osteoporosis
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00231374 -
Measure of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Pressure Variation With Patient Positioning
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00103675 -
Sensor Measurement of Acupuncture Needle Manipulation
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00454064 -
Cognitive-behavioural Treatment of Chronic Back Pain
|
Phase 3 |