View clinical trials related to Back Pain.
Filter by:Exercise and education is recommended as the first-line treatment by evidence-based, international guidelines for low back pain (LBP). Despite consensus regarding treatment, there is a gap between guidelines and what is offered to patients and less than half of the patients with nonspecific low back pain receive proper first-line care. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term effect in pain and function in people with nonspecific LBP, participating in the digitally delivered treatment program Joint Academy.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment of nonspecific pain in the lower back (LBP) is currently largely based on the patient's subjective feelings. The purpose of this study was to use passive medical radiometry (MWR) as a tool for assessing the effectiveness of various treatment methods in patients with acute and subacute nonspecific LBP. Patients with pain assessment on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 6 to 10 points were divided into 2 groups: Group I included patients with pharmacological, syndrome-oriented treatment (n = 30, age 54.9 ± 2.3 years); Group II is a combination pharmacotherapy with self-controlled energy-neuro-adaptive regulation (SCENAR) (n = 25, age 52.8 ± 2.5 years). The investigators will compare that the addition of SCENAR therapy (Group II) will be able to potentiate the analgesic effect of the treatment using VAS. the investigators will confirm that the thermal asymmetry visualization allows to identify the area of pathological muscle spasm and/or inflammation in the projection of the vertebral-motor segment.
The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of paracetamol/ibuprofen Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) compared to ibuprofen in patients with uncomplicated non-specific acute low back pain after a 3-day treatment period.
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of psychologically-informed physical therapy (PIPT) in the ED in a pilot study of ED patients with neck or back pain. We will conduct a single-site, prospective trial comparing the combined program in one group with a usual care-only group. Primary outcomes will focus on feasibility based on recruitment and retention rates, and acceptability based on a 5-point patient satisfaction scale, while secondary outcomes will include pain severity, pain interference, anxiety, physical function, opioid use, repeat ED visits, and hospitalizations at 1 hour and at 24 hours, 1 month and 3 months after ED discharge. We will use pilot study results to develop a protocol for a larger pragmatic randomized clinical trial designed to rigorously evaluate PIPT in the ED combined with Spine Health follow up for ED patients with neck or back pain. We will perform a process evaluation of our proposed clinical trial study design, including characterizing and quantifying the degree of CBT and PT components used by treating PTs while in the ED and during Spine Health follow up, number of Spine Health visits attended in the first month, and integration into usual ED care. Qualitative interviews will be used to identify facilitators, barriers and potential solutions to intervention and research study procedures based on the patients' experience.
The proposed study seeks to evaluate effectiveness, implementation processes, and cost of MOTIVATE among older Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain and comorbid depressive symptoms.
Previous research showed that direct access to physiotherapy, and the associated early physiotherapeutic treatment of patients with low back pain (LBP), results in improved clinical outcomes, as well as reduced health-related costs. However, despite these results, the effectiveness of direct access to physiotherapy and its impact on costs has never been investigated in Belgium. Therefore, the goal of this study is to compare the (cost-)effectiveness of direct access to physiotherapy compared to usual care by the general practitioner (GP) for patients with acute LBP. In this study, 600 patients with acute LBP (lasting >24 hours and <6 weeks) will be divided into two groups (Dutch-speaking: n=2x150; French-speaking n= 2x150). One group will receive treatment through direct access to the physiotherapist, without prescription by a GP. The other group will follow the traditional care pathway through the GP. Th effects on pain, disability and cost-effectiveness will be analysed using questionnaires obtained before and at the end of treatment, after 3 months, after one and after two years. Primary outcomes include pain and disability. Secondary outcomes include clinical outcomes, beliefs related to LBP, quality of life, patient satisfaction, but also direct health care costs, health care resource use, as well as absenteeism and productivity loss. The results of this study will answer the question whether direct access to physiotherapy is (cost)effective for acute LBP. In the long term, these results might be used to optimize the care pathway in Belgium for patients with acute low back pain.
Randomized, Open-label, Oral, Single-dose, two-Sequence, four-Period, crossover study
Randomized, Open-label, Oral, Single-dose, two-Sequence, four-Period, crossover study
Low back pain is a major public health challenge worldwide. The aim of this study will be to compare the effect of dry needling with mobilization on pain, functional disability, quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold using a randomized controlled trial design. pain and functional disability are primary outcomes and quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold are considered as secondary outcomes. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: The experimental group (dry needling, sham mobilization and routine physiotherapy) and the control group (mobilization, sham dry needling and routine physiotherapy).
The main objective of this study is to assess efficacy of a spine rehabilitation program, using spine flexion and extension full active range of motion, on physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain.