View clinical trials related to Back Pain.
Filter by:To determine the effects of pregabalin in reducing pain intensity and improving functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain of neuropathic origin when used in combination with Etoricoxib. Hypothesis Pregabalin-etoricoxib combination is more effective than etoricoxib monotherapy in reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with chronic low back pain. Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference between pregabalin-etoricoxib combination and etoricoxib monotherapy in reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with chronic low back pain. Study Design: Comparative clinical study Setting: Watim General Hospital Duration of study: 18 months after ethical approval Sample Size: a previous study (8), was used to calculate the sample size, Using the WHO sample size calculator, a sample size of 140 patients (70 in each group) was determined with a 5% level of significance and 95% power of test. Sampling Technique: non-probability convenience sampling. Sample selection Inclusion criteria: - Participants within age 20-65 years - Both male and non-pregnant non-lactating female patients will be included in the study - Patients experiencing CLBP symptoms from last 6 months - No experience of previous low back surgery Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with the history of antidepressant, opioid, and benzodiazepine medications - Patients with the history of CYP1A2 inhibitors usage - Patients already taking pregabalin - Patients with the history of suicidal ideation, severe depression, anxiety disorder psychosis, and cognitive impairment Data collection Participants will be divided into two study groups. Group A (n=70) participant will receive 60mg Etoricoxib once daily along with a placebo and Group B (n=70) participants will also receive etoricoxib 60mg once daily(15) along with a placebo for 4 weeks. At the start of week 5 the group B will start taking Pregabalin 75mg along with Etoricoxib 60mg once daily for next 4 weeks, while, group A will continue same treatment as before. At Weeks 0 and 4 and 8 of the study, participants will be evaluated. Liver enzyme levels will be measured both at the beginning and end of the trial. The pain will be measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). CLBP-related impairment will be evaluated using the self-reported 24-item Roland-Morris impairment Questionnaire (RMDQ)
The goal of this two-group randomized trial is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely-delivered health coaching intervention offered in conjunction with usual care for patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic low back pain who present to the emergency department (ED). The main questions this feasibility trial aims to answer are: - Is our health coaching intervention and randomized trial methodology feasible to conduct? - Is our health coaching intervention acceptable to participants and ED providers? Participants will be randomized to one of two groups (usual ED care plus health coaching or usual ED care plus education) and complete outcome assessments at 3 and 6 months after ED discharge. Participants and ED providers will also complete an interview.
Low back pain is one of the most common conditions for which patients are sent to physiotherapy clinics. 84% of people have experienced it at least once in their lifetime, and over 50% have experienced it more than once, according to research. However, diagnosis and, in particular, the provision of specialized back pain therapy remain difficult.
This study aims to measure the effects of spinal manipulation on Chronic Spinal Pain by assessing Muscle Mechanical Properties (MMPs) using MyotonPRO®, Mechanical Perception Threshold (MPT) using Von Frey monofilaments, and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) using an algometer. Participants will be randomly assigned to either spinal manipulation or placebo groups to compare effects on MMPs, MPT, and PPT. Assessments will occur at three time points: baseline, immediately post-intervention (real or simulated), and 24 hours post-intervention. This research targets individuals with chronic spinal pain, providing insights into the potential benefits of spinal manipulation in managing this condition.
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of deep breathing pattern on dynamic balance in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain versus healthy controls. Secondary to compare between dynamic balance control during deep versus regular breathing patterns in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain and healthy controls. Further, to detect whether pain intensity differs during balance testing applying either deep or regular breathing in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.
Pilates has emerged as a prominent exercise therapy gaining recognition among healthcare professionals for its potential benefits in managing low back pain (LBP). As healthcare practitioners increasingly incorporate Pilates into clinical practice, understanding its effects on LBP becomes crucial. This study explores the rationale behind Pilates as a therapeutic intervention for LBP, its diverse applications, varying programme durations, and the significance of long-term follow-ups. Through an examination of existing studies, the aim is to unravel the nuanced impact of Pilates on pain intensity, functional disability, and overall quality of life for individuals experiencing LBP. Furthermore, this study addresses gaps in current research, guiding the way for an extended exploration into the ideal duration of Pilates programmes and the implications of sustained, long-term engagement. Throughout this research study, the following research question was adopted: What is the perception and actual outcomes of a Pilates programme in the management of LBP in the short and long term? The null hypothesis (H0) for this study was that there is no significant difference following a 12 weeks Pilates programme in all outcome measures. The alternative hypothesis (H1) stated that there is significant difference in outcomes following a 12-week Pilates programme in the management of LBP.
Single center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of back pain. A total of 150 patients age 18-65 presenting to the emergency department with chief complaint of backpain will be enrolled from April 2024 - April 2025. Patients will be randomized and symptom levels will be recorded at 30, 60, 90, minutes. Follow-up will be performed by telephone at 24 hours.
Thirty male and female hypertension patients with chronic mechanical non-specific low back pain were included in this randomized controlled study conducted at the Ababa Private Physical Therapy Center in Beni-Seuf, Egypt. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups; the study group A control (n = 15) had a supervised conventional core stability, while the study group B (n = 15) received a home exercise program. In both groups' patients had evaluations before and after their six-week course of therapy. Modified-modified Schober test was used to assess the active back range of motion (ROM), Arabic version of Oswestry disability index (ODI) was utilized to evaluate functional disability, and visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain.
This study is a randomized controlled trial and the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of Static Stretching Versus Post Facilitation Stretch of Iliopsoas combined with core stability exercises in Non-Specific Low Back Pain"
This pilot randomized controlled trial aims to recruit 66 community-dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain and follow up them for 8 weeks. This study aims to test the preliminary effect of a mindfulness-based meditation (MBM) intervention on pain and symptoms among community-dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain, and also to test the effect of the MBM intervention on the host Gut-Brain Axis (GBA).