Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05196412
Other study ID # AinoScreening
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 22, 2022
Est. completion date December 31, 2022

Study information

Verified date June 2022
Source PulseOn Oy
Contact Antti Vehkaoja, DSc (tech)
Phone +358407393181
Email antti.vehkaoja@pulseon.fi
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study investigates the performance pf PulseOn Arrhythmia Monitor System that includes a wrist-worn device, which combines continuous optical heartbeat interval monitoring and intermittent ECG measurement, and a data management system used by healthcare professionals for data observation, in the detection of previously undiagnosed cardiac arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation.


Description:

The study consists of monitoring voluntary subjects with PulseOn Arrhythmia Monitoring System for the period of two weeks. The subjects are recruited mainly through newspaper advertisements. The study is executed in Tampere and Helsinki areas, Finland. During the two week monitoring time, the subjects are instructed to wear the wrist device continuously, except when taking the device off e.g. for going to sauna or swimming, and for charging. The subjects are instructed to perform a 35-second ECG measurement (recording) in three cases: 1. Scheduled recording four times a day 2. In case of suspecting arrhythmic event, i.e. feeling symptoms 3. In case the wrist device instructs to perform a recording by vibrating and showing an LED light The data collected in the study is analysed post-hoc. In the post-hoc analysis, the cardiac rhythm assessed automatically from the ECG measurements is visually confirmed by a cardiologist.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date December 31, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 50 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria for the main study group: - At least 65 years of age - Self-assessed ability to use the study devices - Ability to give informed consent - Volunteering for the study Inclusion criteria for the active endurance athlete group: - Minimum of 10 years of active training of endurance sport (e.g. long distance running, skiing, cycling, triathlon…) and currently an average amount of training of at least 10 hours a week. - Age: = 50 years - Self-assessed ability to use the study devices - Ability to give informed consent - Volunteering for the study Exclusion Criteria for both groups: - Cardiac pacemaker - Earlier diagnosis of atrial fibrillation - Inability to give informed consent - Denial

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
PulseOn Arrhythmia Monitor device
Wearing of the wrist device for a period of two weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
Finland Tampere Heart Hospital Tampere

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
PulseOn Oy Atostek Oy, TAYS Sydänkeskus Oy

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Finland, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Diagnostic performance improvement with continuous optical measurement Percentual improvement in the performance of detecting previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in the study population by the continuous PPG-based heartbeat interval monitoring when compared with relying only on scheduled and symptom -based ECG measurements. Cardiac rhythm assessed by a cardiologist from the ECG measurements that are made as a result of PPG-based arrhythmia notifications is compared with rhythm assessments made only from the scheduled and symptom-based ECG measurements. It is evaluated whether more subjects can be diagnosed having atrial fibrillation with the help of continuous PPG-based rhythm monitoring. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Primary Validation of the clinical performance of PulseOn Arrhythmia Monitor System in general population by showing the adequacy of the obtained ECG data for clinical decision making. Data recorded by the study subjects during the two-week study time is assessed by a cardiologist and subjects are classified as having: "no observed arrhythmias", "atrial fibrillation episode(s)", "other potential arrhythmia", or "unconfident assessment" (due to the quality or lack of data). The percentage of "unconfident assessment" shall be less than 20% of the subjects. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Primary Validation of the clinical performance of PulseOn Arrhythmia Monitor System in general population by showing sufficient patient convenience for using the device for the intended duration of two weeks The feedback from the subjects should show at least grade 3 in a scale of 1-5 for the "comfortability of using the wrist device". Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Secondary Showing the benefit of the combined wrist-worn PPG and ECG solution in detecting other cardiac arrhythmias than atrial fibrillation. The visual ECG-based rhythm annotation made by a cardiologist is compared with simultaneous PPG-algorithm alarm state. The incidence of notifications for other arrhythmias than atrial fibrilation is reported. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Secondary Evaluation of the necessity of performing scheduled ECG measurements in addition to ECG measurements triggered by PPG-based arrhythmia notifications for detecting atrial fibrillation. Evaluation is done by comparing the atrial fibrillation detection outcome when considering only the PPG-triggered and symptom-based ECG measurements or when considering also the scheduled ECG measurements. The outcome parameter is the number of subjects that would have been left undetected if the scheduled ECG measurements were not taken. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Secondary Feedback about the usability of the evaluated solution from study subjects. Feedback questions in scale of 1-5 and open-ended feedback. Easiness of use of the wrist device, understandability of the user interface, suitability of the user materials, and unobtrusiveness. At the end of the 2-week measurement period
Secondary Feedback about the usability of the evaluated solution from study personnel. Feedback questions in scale of 1-5 and open-ended feedback. Easiness of use of the data management service, suitability of the user materials. At the end of the study i.e. the end of 2022.
Secondary Quality of the measured ECG signals Percentage of the ECG measurements classified as inadequate quality for rhythm assessment either an ECG analysis algorithm or by a doctor. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Secondary Assessment of the subjects' adherence in using the solution. Analysis of how well the participants will follow the study protocol and do the participants register their ECG in correlation with the wrist device notification. The outcome parameter is the percentage of scheduled and PPG-based notifications to take an ECG measurement and the variation of the percentage between the subjects. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Secondary Benefit of optical measurement for the speed of detecting atrial fibrillation Comparison of the time to the first detection of atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmia when considering PPG-triggered ECG measurements or when considering the scheduled ECG measurements. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
Secondary Evaluation of the accuracy of automatic ECG analysis algorithms when comparing with manual annotations by a cardiologist. The automated assessment done for the 30-second ECG recordings is compared with the visual assessment to calculate the sensitivity and specificity for each rhythm category. Duration of patient measurement, i.e. two weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05654272 - Development of CIRC Technologies
Terminated NCT04115735 - His Bundle Recording From Subclavian Vein
Completed NCT04571385 - A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AP30663 for Cardioversion in Participants With Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Phase 2
Completed NCT05366803 - Women's Health Initiative Silent Atrial Fibrillation Recording Study N/A
Completed NCT02864758 - Benefit-Risk Of Arterial THrombotic prEvention With Rivaroxaban for Atrial Fibrillation in France
Recruiting NCT05442203 - Electrocardiogram-based Artificial Intelligence-assisted Detection of Heart Disease N/A
Completed NCT05599308 - Evaluation of Blood Pressure Monitor With AFib Screening Feature N/A
Completed NCT03790917 - Assessment of Adherence to New Oral anTicoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation patiEnts Within the Outpatient registrY
Enrolling by invitation NCT05890274 - Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Electrocardiogram (EKG) Interpretation Project ECHO N/A
Recruiting NCT05266144 - Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation
Recruiting NCT05316870 - Construction and Effect Evaluation of Anticoagulation Management Model in Atrial Fibrillation N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06023784 - The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block N/A
Recruiting NCT05572814 - Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams N/A
Recruiting NCT04092985 - Smart Watch iECG for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Completed NCT04087122 - Evaluate the Efficiency Impact of Conducting Active Temperature Management During Cardiac Cryoablation Procedures N/A
Completed NCT06283654 - Relieving the Emergency Department by Using a 1-lead ECG Device for Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Recruiting NCT05416086 - iCLAS™ Cryoablation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study N/A
Completed NCT05067114 - Solutions for Atrial Fibrillation Edvocacy (SAFE)
Completed NCT04546763 - Study Watch AF Detection At Home
Completed NCT03761394 - Pulsewatch: Smartwatch Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke N/A