Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trial
The primary objective of this research is to determine if evaluating CIEDs using CareLink
Express® can lead to shorter time to interrogation in the Emergency Department compared to
evaluation of devices using traditional evaluation procedures. The goal of the research is to
determine if patients evaluated by CareLink Express® have a reduction of "time to
interrogation" compared to the traditional patient cohort.
Secondary objectives of the study are to determine any significant differences in the two
populations regarding:
1. Health care resource utilization including total charges for ED care.
2. Number of patients leaving the ED without being seen (LWBS) or left without the device
interrogation completed.
3. Device related issues detected.
Background:
Over the past 15 years the number of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) implanted
has increased dramatically. This is due in part to the aging of the population in general,
but primarily due to expanded indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs),
cardiac resynchronization pacemaker therapy (CRT-P) devices, and CRT devices with
defibrillator capabilities ("biventricular ICDs" or CRT-D devices). As more patients with
structural heart disease survive longer, and as more CIEDs are placed, the number of patients
requiring treatment in the emergency departments for arrhythmias and potential device-related
matters has increased.
When a patient with a CIED experiences a problem they presume to be cardiac in nature, they
often go to the emergency room to seek care. Most emergency departments (ED) are neither
equipped to interrogate the CIED, nor staffed with personnel trained to interrogate the CIED.
These CIEDs often record data that can assist the physician in the formulation of a
diagnostic and treatment strategy tailored to the specific needs of the patient. However,
interrogation of the device is dependent on proprietary programming equipment that is not
routinely kept in the emergency department. The programming equipment has traditionally been
a "stand-alone" unit, which can store the data from the device interrogation (onto a USB
drive or floppy disk), but does not have the capability to transmit the data to the patient's
physician for rapid interpretation. In addition, ED personnel are not routinely trained to
assess CIEDs. In most health care institutions, it is standard practice for a representative
of the manufacturer to be contacted so the device can be evaluated. The representative must
then travel to the ED with the programming equipment to interrogate the CIED on site. After
interrogation, either the representative discusses the findings with the ED physician, or
calls the physician that manages the patient's device. The process of in-person device
evaluation can be cumbersome and inefficient, especially in an emergency setting. The time
involved in the device interrogation process can cause delays in patient care and add
unnecessary costs for the patient and health care institution.
Methods:
Patients with CIEDs will be evaluated in the ED setting. Patients will be divided into two
cohorts. Each cohort will have a minimum of 50 patients.
The control group will include CIED patients who have been evaluated in the ED at The Heart
Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano. A minimum of 50 devices
not compatible with the CareLink Express® system will be prospectively interrogated in the
traditional evaluation method using the device manufacturer representative.
The study group will include CIED patients who present to the ED and receive a device
evaluation using the CareLink Express® system. A minimum of 50 devices will be prospectively
evaluated using CareLink Express®.
The patient's presenting symptoms in the ED include any medical conditions (not just
cardiac).
Consent will be obtained from the subject after treatment has occurred in the ED and prior to
release. Consent can be obtained from the subject or the subject's Legally Authorized
Representative. This will ensure that treatment is not delayed or altered for research
purposes.
Initial data will be collected using a Data Collection Form. The research staff or a research
trained Emergency Department staff member will complete the Data Form.
Data will be collected by the research coordinators who will collect the Data Collection
Forms from the ED at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at
Plano. The Data Collection Form will be used by the research coordinators to determine the
patient's study cohort.
Other data will be collected by the research coordinators using the hospital EMR and
Financial systems.
Data Collection:
Criteria for the hospital and ED encounters will be extracted from the hospital EMR, the Data
Collection Form, or the hospital financial system. Device data will be extracted from the
device report completed at the time of the device interrogation.
;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05654272 -
Development of CIRC Technologies
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04571385 -
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AP30663 for Cardioversion in Participants With Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT04115735 -
His Bundle Recording From Subclavian Vein
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05366803 -
Women's Health Initiative Silent Atrial Fibrillation Recording Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02864758 -
Benefit-Risk Of Arterial THrombotic prEvention With Rivaroxaban for Atrial Fibrillation in France
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05442203 -
Electrocardiogram-based Artificial Intelligence-assisted Detection of Heart Disease
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05599308 -
Evaluation of Blood Pressure Monitor With AFib Screening Feature
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03790917 -
Assessment of Adherence to New Oral anTicoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation patiEnts Within the Outpatient registrY
|
||
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05890274 -
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Electrocardiogram (EKG) Interpretation Project ECHO
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05266144 -
Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05316870 -
Construction and Effect Evaluation of Anticoagulation Management Model in Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06023784 -
The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05572814 -
Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04092985 -
Smart Watch iECG for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04087122 -
Evaluate the Efficiency Impact of Conducting Active Temperature Management During Cardiac Cryoablation Procedures
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT06283654 -
Relieving the Emergency Department by Using a 1-lead ECG Device for Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Pulmonary Vein Isolation
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05416086 -
iCLAS™ Cryoablation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05067114 -
Solutions for Atrial Fibrillation Edvocacy (SAFE)
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04546763 -
Study Watch AF Detection At Home
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03761394 -
Pulsewatch: Smartwatch Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke
|
N/A |