Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trial
Official title:
Patients Assessment of Satisfaction for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Conventional Oral Anticoagulant (OAC) Compared With Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC)
| NCT number | NCT03187197 |
| Other study ID # | 1160-0286 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | June 20, 2017 |
| Est. completion date | January 11, 2019 |
| Verified date | February 2020 |
| Source | Boehringer Ingelheim |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Observational |
To describe the treatment perception from patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving Pradaxa® or VKA for stroke prevention by using the self-estimation questionnaire of PACT-Q during a 6-month study period.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 1315 |
| Est. completion date | January 11, 2019 |
| Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2018 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 20 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion criteria: Cohort A (patients switched from VKA to Pradaxa) - Written informed consent prior to participation. - Female or male patients = 20 years of age with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). - At least 3 months of continuous VKA treatment for stroke prevention prior to baseline assessment. - Patients switched to Pradaxa prior to baseline assessment according to the physician's discretion and the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs)/reimbursement criteria. OR Cohort B (patients newly initiated Pradaxa or VKA) - Written informed consent prior to participation. - Female or male patients = 20 years of age, newly diagnosed with NVAF, and no previous treatment for stroke prevention (no use of any OAC within 1 year prior to enrolment). - Patients initiated stroke prevention treatment with Pradaxa or VKA according to the physician's discretion and the SmPCs/reimbursement criteria. Exclusion criteria: - Contraindication to the use of Pradaxa® or VKA as described in the SmPCs. - Patients receiving Pradaxa® or VKA for any other condition than stroke prevention in NVAF. - Current participation in any clinical trial of a drug or device. - Current participation in an AF-related registry, e.g. the Gloria AF program. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | Chang-Hua Christian Hospital | Changhua | |
| Taiwan | Show Chwan Memorial Hospital | Changhua | |
| Taiwan | Chia-Yi Christian Hospital | Chia-Yi City | |
| Taiwan | Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital | Hsinchu | |
| Taiwan | National Taiwan University Hospital-Hsin-Chu Branch | Hsinchu | |
| Taiwan | E-Da Hospital | Kaohsiung | |
| Taiwan | Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Kaohsiung | |
| Taiwan | Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital | Kaohsiung | |
| Taiwan | Far Eastern Memorial Hospital | New Taipei City | |
| Taiwan | Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital | New Taipei City | |
| Taiwan | China Medical University Hospital | Taichung | |
| Taiwan | Taichung Veterans General Hospital | Taichung | |
| Taiwan | Chi Mei Medical Center | Tainan | |
| Taiwan | NCKUH | Tainan | |
| Taiwan | Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital | Tainan | |
| Taiwan | Mackay Memorial Hospital | Taipei | |
| Taiwan | National Taiwan University Hospital | Taipei | |
| Taiwan | Shin Kong International HealthCare Center | Taipei | |
| Taiwan | Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital | Taipei | |
| Taiwan | Tri-Service General Hospital | Taipei | |
| Taiwan | Taipe Veterans General Hospital | Taipei City | |
| Taiwan | Taipei Medical University Hospital | Taipei City | |
| Taiwan | Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(TaoYuan) | Taoyuan | |
| Taiwan | National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch | Yunlin County |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Boehringer Ingelheim |
Taiwan,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline Assessment | The PACT-Q was a self-administered questionnaire which was developed as a means to investigate patients´ satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment and treatment convenience in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or atrial fibrillation (AF). The PACT-Q2 was composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed(reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score (CDS). Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score (SDS). High scores were more favorable. The two dimension scores were presented for Baseline, Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD). | Baseline, Visit 2 (30-45 days after initiation on Pradaxa®), Visit 3 (150-210 days after initiation on Pradaxa®). | |
| Primary | Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment Groups | The PACT-Q2 was composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores were more favorable. The two dimension scores were presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD). Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to identify matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Only the matched patients in each treatment group was summarized and used for comparison. | Visit 2 (30-45 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA) and Visit 3 (150-210 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA). | |
| Secondary | Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second Assessment | The PACT-Q2 was composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores were more favorable. The two dimension scores were presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD). | Visit 2 (30-45 days after initiation on Pradaxa®) and Visit 3 (150-210 days after initiation on Pradaxa®). | |
| Secondary | Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at Baseline | The PACT-Q1 was composed of a single dimension (7 items), covering the expectations of patients regarding their anticoagulant treatment, and was to be administered before treatment initiation. The 7 items were: Q1: How confident are you that your anticoagulant treatment will prevent blood clots? Q2: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will relieve some of the symptoms you experience? Q3: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will cause side effects such as minor bruises or bleeding? Q4: How important is it for you to have an anticoagulant treatment that is easy to take? Q5: How concerned are you about making mistakes when taking your anticoagulant treatment? Q6: How important is it for you to take care of your anticoagulant treatment by yourself? Q7: How concerned are you about how much you pay for your anticoagulant treatment? Responses ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely/Completely/Very much). | Baseline |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05654272 -
Development of CIRC Technologies
|
||
| Terminated |
NCT04115735 -
His Bundle Recording From Subclavian Vein
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04571385 -
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AP30663 for Cardioversion in Participants With Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT05366803 -
Women's Health Initiative Silent Atrial Fibrillation Recording Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02864758 -
Benefit-Risk Of Arterial THrombotic prEvention With Rivaroxaban for Atrial Fibrillation in France
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05442203 -
Electrocardiogram-based Artificial Intelligence-assisted Detection of Heart Disease
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05599308 -
Evaluation of Blood Pressure Monitor With AFib Screening Feature
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03790917 -
Assessment of Adherence to New Oral anTicoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation patiEnts Within the Outpatient registrY
|
||
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05890274 -
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Electrocardiogram (EKG) Interpretation Project ECHO
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05266144 -
Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05316870 -
Construction and Effect Evaluation of Anticoagulation Management Model in Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06023784 -
The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05572814 -
Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04092985 -
Smart Watch iECG for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04087122 -
Evaluate the Efficiency Impact of Conducting Active Temperature Management During Cardiac Cryoablation Procedures
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT06283654 -
Relieving the Emergency Department by Using a 1-lead ECG Device for Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Pulmonary Vein Isolation
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05416086 -
iCLAS™ Cryoablation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05067114 -
Solutions for Atrial Fibrillation Edvocacy (SAFE)
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04546763 -
Study Watch AF Detection At Home
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03761394 -
Pulsewatch: Smartwatch Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke
|
N/A |