Atherosclerosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium in Active Duty Enlisted Military Members With 10 or More Years of Service
Verified date | May 2020 |
Source | David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
Hypothesis: Enlisted military members with 10 or more years of service and at least one cardiovascular risk factor will demonstrate a higher risk of future cardiac events as assessed by coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring than the risk calculated by the Framingham Risk Score.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 112 |
Est. completion date | July 18, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | July 18, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 35 Years and older |
Eligibility |
INCLUSION Criteria: Active Duty Military Members with at least 10 years of service Enlisted Rank Males 35 years and older OR Females 45 years and older (please note the age difference is due to the fact that female plaque formation with calcification has been shown to lag that of males by about 10 years) One or More of the Following Risk Factors: Smoker - at least 5 pack years in the past 5 years (pack year = number of packs per day number of years of smoking) Diabetic (Fasting glucose of >125 mg/dL on two or more blood draws, or Random Blood Glucose of >200 mg/dL on a single blood draw, or Hemoglobin A1C >6.5%, or previous diagnosis of diabetes listed in the subject's medical record) or Pre-diabetic (Fasting glucose >100 on two or more blood draws or Hgb A1C 5.7-6.4) Hypertension (Systolic BP > 140 or Diastolic BP >90 or on blood pressure medications or diagnosis of hypertension in medical record) Waist Circumference > 40 inches for males or >35 inches for females Hyperlipidemia (LDL>130, HDL<40 for males, HDL <50 for females, Triglycerides >200, on lipid lowering medications and/or diagnosis of hyperlipidemia in medical record) EXCLUSION Criteria: Males <35 years old Women <45 years old (please note the age difference is due to the fact that female plaque formation with calcification has been shown to lag that of males by about 10 years) Officer Rank - officers are excluded as we are looking at the enlisted culture in the military. History of any of the following: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Myocardial Infarction (MI) Percutaneous Intervention/Stent Placement (PCI) Angina Radiotherapy (external beam, brachytherapy, radiopharmaceutical) Under the care of any of the following types of providers in the past 12 months (As these subjects are at greater risk of having had significant radiation exposure to the chest over the past 12 months): Radiation/Medical Oncologist Interventional Radiologist Cardiologist Cardiothoracic Surgeon Vascular Surgeon Females who think they may be pregnant Pregnant females |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | David Grant USAF Medical Center | Travis Air Force Base | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Prevalence of Atherosclerosis | Percent of active duty enlisted military members with 10 or more years of military service determined to have a prevalence of atherosclerosis based on CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale), is derived from the CAC score (i.e., an estimate of the degree of atherosclerosis present in each participant's coronary arteries, reported as a number), and percentage by age to establish risk of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: Low risk = CAC of 0 and no cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, Low - Moderate risk = CAC of 0 with CV risk factors, Moderate - High risk: CAC 1-100 and percentile for age <75%, High risk = CAC 100-399 or percentile for age >75%, Very high risk = CAC >100 and percentile for age >90% or CAC >400". Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst. | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Primary | Rate of Reclassification | Percent/Number of subject that were reclassified from FRS to CAC risk category using CAC scores. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Primary | Compare FRS to the CAC - At Least One Additional Risk Factor | Compare FRS risk category to CAC risk category for enlisted subjects with at least 10 years of service and at least one additional CV risk factor to determine how well the results correlate with one another using the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Metabolic Syndrome - Compare FRS to CAC | Compare FRS category and CAC risk category for those meeting and not meeting criteria for metabolic syndrome. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between the presence/absence of metabolic syndrome and the FRS and CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Living in the Dorms - Compare FRS to CAC | Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those who lived in the dorms > 5 years and < 5 years. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those who lived in the dorms > 5 years and < 5 years and the FRS and CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Physical Fitness (PT) Failures - Compare FRS to CAC | Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those with and without PT failures. Calculate Fischer's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those with and without PT failures and the FRS and CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Years of Military Service - Compare FRS to CAC | Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those with 10-14, 15-19, 20-24 and 25+ years of military service. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those with 10-14, 15-19, 20-24 and 25+ years of military service and FRS & CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Additional Cardiovascular Risk Factors - Compare FRS to CAC | Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those with 1 risk factor (RF), vs 2 RF, vs 3 RF, vs 4 RF, vs 5 CV risk factors. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those with 1 RF, vs 2 RF, vs 3 RF, vs 4 RF, vs 5 CV RF and the FRS & CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Metabolic Syndrome - CAC | Compare CAC risk category between two groups, those that meet criteria for metabolic syndrome and those that do not, to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Living in the Doors - CAC | Compare CAC risk category between two groups, those who lived in the dorm for > 5 years and < 5 years, to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | PT Failures - CAC | Compare CAC risk category between two groups, those with and without a PT failures, to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Years of Military Service - CAC | Compare CAC risk category among groups, those with 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, and 25+ years of military service, to see if there is an association between overall years of military service and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan | |
Secondary | Additional Risk Factors - CAC | Compare CAC risk category among groups, those with 1 risk factor (RF) vs. 2 RF, vs 3 RF, vs 4 RF, vs 5 RF (as listed in the inclusion criteria), to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome | within 10 days of CT scan |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05052918 -
The Effect of Exercise and Metformin on Carotid Intima-media Thickness in Patients With Prediabetes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04511234 -
Sirolimus Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon for SFA and Popliteal Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05906797 -
Impact of Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy in the Improvement of Early Endothelial Dysfunction in Subjects With Periodontitis.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273972 -
INvestigating the Lowest Threshold of Vascular bENefits From LDL Lowering With a PCSK9 InhibiTor in healthY Volunteers
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT02932176 -
Machine Learning for Handheld Vascular Studies
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05158257 -
Clinical Of Plain Balloon Dilatation Combined Stent Versus Endovascular Debulking Combined Drug-coated Balloon to Treat Arteriosclerosis Occlusive Disease of Lower Extremity
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01212900 -
Randomized Trial of Imaging Versus Risk Factor-Based Therapy for Plaque Regression
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03697382 -
Effect of Daily Steps on Fat Metabolism
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06230406 -
T-Mem GEne in Atherosclerosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT03654313 -
Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of MEDI6570 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00382564 -
Magnetic Resonance Angiography to Diagnose Atherosclerotic Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02894931 -
Effects of Dietary Interventions on Serum and Macrophage Atherogenicity
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02578355 -
National Plaque Registry and Database
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02998918 -
Effects of Short-term Curcumin and Multi-polyphenol Supplementation on the Anti-inflammatory Properties of HDL
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02265250 -
Pilot Study-Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Global Atherosclerosis Risk Assessment
|
||
Completed |
NCT02224339 -
New Technologies to Determine Carotid Plaque Vulnerability
|
||
Completed |
NCT03393377 -
Preventive Arterial Wall Phenotype and Low-dose Fluvastatin/Valsartan Combination
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02268513 -
Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) Social Network Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT02377310 -
Pd/Pa vs iFRâ„¢ in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02116829 -
Is There Room for Butter in a Healthy Diet?
|
N/A |