View clinical trials related to ARDS.
Filter by:Abstract Background: Clinicians in pulmonary critical care medicine and critical care medicine considered dapsone administration to treat SARS-CoV-2 inflammasome. Dapsone is useful in the molecular regulation of Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3). Objective: To study the targeting of NLRP3 itself or up-/downstream factors of the NLRP3 inflammasome by dapsone must be responsible for its observed preventive effects, functioning as a competitor. Methods: Patients who were on standard COVID-19 therapy are also after obtaining off label uses and explanation of side effects are started on dapsone 100-200 mg daily along with Cimetadine 400 mg three times daily.
This is a Phase 2 randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of COVI-MSC in the setting of current standard of care treatments for subjects hospitalized subjects with acute respiratory distress syndrome not related to COVID-19 infection.
The corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), suddenly incepted in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, leading to one of the greatest health care emergencies of the last century. Acute exacerbation of the COVID-19 can develop to an ARDS in a significant proportion of hospitalized cases, leading to invasive mechanical ventilation requirement and in some cases even mandating use of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. Being a disease having affected up to 15'581'009 as of July 25th, with more than 635'173 deaths, the long-term repercussions are of foremost importance. Health care systems world-wide will be faced with the aftermath of COVID-19, and optimal understanding of the long-term progression of COVID-19 may aid in a better care of critically ill patients and enable specifically targeted rehabilitation programs to improve outcomes. Primary objective of this study is to assess the repercussions of COVID-19 induced critical illness on long-term functional status, quality-of-life, neuropsychology and cognition
Transpulmonary pressure may be higher in ARDS patients due to decreased respiratory system compliance. The hypothesis is that tidal volumes which are generated by Intellivent- Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) are safe range by transpulmonary pressure.
Primary Research Question for the Full ULTIMATE Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT): What is the effect of ultra-protective ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) versus best current conventional ventilation (CV) on all-cause hospital mortality among patients with early moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)? Secondary Research Questions: Among patients with early moderate-severe ARDS, what is the effect of ultra-protective ventilation versus CV on: (1) duration of mechanical ventilation; (2) duration of ICU and hospital stay; (3) organ dysfunction; (4) barotrauma; and (5) mortality at other time-points (ICU discharge, 28-day, 60-day)? The ULTIMATE Pilot Study: Before embarking on a definitive multinational trial to address the questions listed above, the ULTIMATE Pilot Study has these 3 specific feasibility objectives: 1. To assess adherence to our explicit mechanical ventilation protocols, with particular focus on delivered tidal volumes in both groups; 2. To estimate the rate of patient recruitment and understand barriers to recruitment; and 3. To measure and understand the reasons for crossovers or rescue by ECMO in the control group. In addition, we will monitor safety issues, recording serious adverse events in both groups.
The improvement in ARDS mortality over the last 20 years seems to be largely explained by the reduction of mechanical ventilation-induced injury (VILI). VILI is essentially related to volotrauma closely associated with "strain" and "stress". The pulmonary stress corresponds to the transpulmonary pressure (alveolar pressure - pleural pressure), and the strain to the change in lung volume related to the functional residual capacity (FRC) of the injured lung at PEEP = 0. The volotrauma corresponds therefore to the generalized excess of stress and strain on the injured lung. The initial therapeutic strategy consists in protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg of theoretical ideal weight (predicted by height), associated with a high respiratory rate between 25 and 30 cycles per minute to control PaCO2 (< 50 mmHg), apply a high positive expiratory pressure PEEP according to FiO2, maintain a plateau pressure (PP) lower than 30 cmH20, reduce instrumental dead space, use curarization, recruitment maneuvers such as alternate prone, improve ventilation-perfusion adequacy using inhaled NO. As a last resort, extracorporeal oxygenation by veno-venous ECMO is a device to supplement respiratory function by improving oxygenation and ensuring decarboxylation. Veno-venous ECMO is indicated in severe ARDS with PaO2/FiO2 < 80 mmHg and/or when mechanical ventilation becomes unsafe due to increased plateau pressure despite optimized ARDS management including high PEEP levels, curarization and prone position. After lung resection surgery, the incidence of ARDS is 2-8% and its prognosis remains more poor, despite advances in management, with a mortality of up to 60%. Risk factors include intraoperative vascular filling, type of pulmonary resection, and predicted postoperative respiratory function. Early support with VV ECMO is vital in some patients to treat severe hypoxemia, due to variable surgical reduction of lung parenchyma depending on carcinological involvement or initial lung pathology. ). There are very few data concerning these patients with pulmonary resection. The primary objective of this study is to describe the prevalence of ARDS and the risk factors for its occurrence after pulmonary resection surgery. The secondary objective is to compare the ventilation parameters (especially motor pressure) in patients with reduced lung parenchyma in ARDS under VV ECMO with those who did not use VV ECMO assistance.
The SARS-CoV2 pandemic and resulting COVID-19 infection has led to a large increase in the number of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is a severe, life-threatening medical condition characterised by inflammation and fluid in the lungs. There is no proven therapy to reduce fluid leak, also known as pulmonary oedema, in ARDS. However, recent studies have discovered that imatinib strengthens the cell barrier and prevents fluid leak in the lungs in inflammatory conditions, while leaving the immune response intact. The investigators hypothesize that imatinib limits pulmonary oedema observed in ARDS due to COVID-19, and may thus help to reverse hypoxemic respiratory failure and to hasten recovery. The hypothesis will be tested by conducting a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multi-centre clinical study of intravenous imatinib in 90 mechanically-ventilated, adult subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS. Study participants will receive the study drug (imatinib or placebo) twice daily for a period of 7 days. The effect of the intervention will be tested by measuring extravascular lung water (i.e. pulmonary oedema) difference between day 1 and day 4, using a PiCCO catheter (= pulse contour cardiac monitoring device). Other measurements will include regular blood tests to investigate the safety and the pharmacokinetic properties of imatinib, as well as biomarkers of inflammation and cellular dysfunction. Furthermore, parameters of ventilation and morbidity and mortality will be recorded as secondary outcome measures.
The aim of this study is to make analysis of potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome of mechanically ventilated ARDS adult patient receiving lung protective strategy. Primary Objective: is to evaluate whether DP was superior to the variables that define it in predicting hospital outcome including mortality. Secondary Objective: is to identify manageable factors associated with outcome such as ventilator-related parameters and to investigate the role of non-modifiable factors such as demographic characteristics, severity of illness.
Using echocardiography to investigate the incidence of RV dysfunction in ventilated patients with COVID-19.
Phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) first-in-human study in healthy subjects. Safety and tolerability assessments will be conducted, and blood samples will be taken pre-dose and at several time points post-dose for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis.