View clinical trials related to ARDS.
Filter by:Many of the patients hospitalized for a severe form of SARSCoV-2 respiratory impairment require prolonged intensive care that can be complicated in the short term, In the medium and long term, physical and psychological sequelae can affect patients' quality of life and prevent a return to normal working life. To date, there is little data on the fate of patients treated in Resuscitation for a severe form of COVID-19, both in terms of respiratory sequelae, as well as in terms of psychological sequelae and their quality of life. The objective of this study is to be able to describe and evaluate the possible physical and psychological sequelae and quality of life of patients hospitalized in Resuscitation for a severe form of COVID-19 in the short (3 and 6 months), medium (1 year) and long (5 years) End of their stay in ICU. To do this, we want to carry out a prospective, observational and monocentric study in the consultation department of the Nice CHU. All patients admitted to Resuscitation for a severe form of COVID-19 who have accepted the longitudinal medical follow-up proposed by the Nice CHU will be included in the study and data from the computerized medical record will be analyzed.
Prone position (PP) has been proved to be effective in severe ARDS patients. On the other hand, High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) may prevent intubation in hypoxemic Acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients. Our hypothesis is that the combination of PP and HFNC in patients with COVID19 induced ARDS may decrease the need of mechanical ventilation. Primary outcome: Therapeutic failure within 28 days of randomization (death or intubation). Secondary outcomes: to analyze PP feasibility and safety in HFNC patients and to analyze effectiveness in terms of oxygenation. Methods: multicentric randomized study including patients with COVID19 induced ARDS supported with HFNC. Experimental group will received HFNC and PP whereas observation group will received standard care. Optimization of non-invasive respiratory management of COVID19 induced ARDS patients may decrease the need of invasive mechanical ventilation and subsequently ICU and hospital length of stay.
Multicenter investigation featuring an open-label lead-in followed by a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2/3 part to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MultiStem therapy in subjects with moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to pathogens including COVID-19.
The study aims to investigate the efficacy of extracorporeal CO2 removal for correction of hypercapnia in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome
The optimal amount caloric intake were still controversy in critically ill patients in literature. There were no significant outcome difference with different caloric intake in acute lung injury patients. In order to identify the optimal amount caloric intake in acute lung injury patients, we conduct a prospectively observational study to see whether the caloric differences influence hospital mortality.
The severity of ARDS in high altitude areas was classified according to the Berlin standard high altitude area Oxygenation.
There is little evidence about the mechanical characteristics and muscular function in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) at the time of weaning of the mechanical ventilation, as well as the behavior of the mechanical properties, breathing pattern, muscular effort, and gas exchange during a successful and failed spontaneous breathing trial.
The severity stratification criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Xi'ning Qinghai province (mean altitude: 2200m) were clarified according to the oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2).
Previous clinical trials in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have demonstrated that ventilator management choices can improve Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality and shorten time on mechanical ventilation. This study seeks to scale an established Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool to facilitate dissemination and implementation of evidence-based research in mechanical ventilation of infants and children with pediatric ARDS (PARDS). This will be accomplished by using CDS tools developed and deployed in Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) which are based on the best available pediatric evidence, and are currently being used in an NHLBI funded single center randomized controlled trial (NCT03266016, PI: Khemani). Without CDS, there is significant variability in ventilator management of PARDS patients both between and within Pediatric ICUs (PICUs), but clinicians are willing to accept CDS recommendations. The CDS tool will be deployed in multiple PICUs, targeting enrollment of up to 180 children with PARDS. Study hypotheses: 1. The CDS tool in will be implementable in nearly all participating sites 2. There will be > 80% compliance with CDS recommendations and 3. The investigators can implement automatic data capture and entry in many of the ICUs Once feasibility of this CDS tool is demonstrated, a multi-center validation study will be designed, which seeks to determine whether the CDS can result in a significant reduction in length of mechanical ventilation (LMV).
Investigation of effect of inhalation sedation by administration of Sevoflurane compared with Propofol on the moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome course in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.