View clinical trials related to Aortic Aneurysm.
Filter by:Prospective, randomized, multi-center study designed to evaluate the outcomes of commercially available contemporary EVAR in a real-world population. Patients will be randomized into two device cohorts and compared across the primary endpoints. Patients will be followed procedurally to discharge, at 1, 6, 12 months and annually through to 5 years (total follow-up commitment).
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a multi-branched thoracoabdominal stent graft system for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.
Retrospective study on the outcome of the renal function in patients operated because of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a multifactorial degenerative disorder, which if untreated might lead to catastrophic complications. The treatment for AAA includes open and endovascular repair, both of which carry a significant degree of risk. Thus, researchers have performed several studies addressing simple and readily available risk stratification markers, such as complete blood count in patients undergoing open AAA repair. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been frequently used as a marker of systemic inflammatory response, which reflects neutrophilia and lymphopenia. The primary pathophysiology of AAA involves chronic inflammation in the aortic wall and atherosclerosis, accompanied with thrombosis. NLR was proposed as a fair indicator for poor prognosis in patients with AAA. The mean platelet volume (MPV) is the marker of platelet activation and an indicator of the activation of thrombus formation. Moreover, it is reportedly associated with the prognosis of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) suggests thrombosis and inflammation and indicates a high risk of cardiovascular events in various groups of patients. The PLR is associated with poor prognosis following AAA repair. Despite accumulating evidence for the prognostic value of white blood cell counts in abdominal aortic aneurysm, few studies have investigated the value of these parameters, including NLR, MPV, and PLR, in patients undergoing AAA open repair. The investigators aimed to investigate if preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), or mean platelet volume (MPV) could be used to predict 1-year mortality in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
This is a Prospective Registry study to collect imaging and clinical data both on patients with aortic aneurysm disease undergoing serial monitoring and on patients pre and post-endovascular repair, using ViTAA (The Sponsor) aortic mapping technology.
Aneurysm of the abdominal aorta is defined by a loss of parallelism of the arterial wall. The main risk of this pathology is the rupture of the aneurysm which is life threatening and this risk increases with the size of the aneurysm. Connected stents allow the management of complex thoracoabdominal aneurysms in patients at high surgical risk and/or contraindicated for open surgery. These endovascular techniques have demonstrated their safety and efficacy, however, long-term CT follow-up remains essential to detect complications such as endo-leaks and restenosis/thrombosis of visceral and renal stents. The prognostic factors of these complications remain poorly elucidated. The type of stent to be used could be an explanation, however, no stent has been proven to be superior in this application to date. Data from the literature suggest an influence of stents on the aortic geometry and the arterial axes of the digestive tract during respiratory movements. The work of the Stanford vascular surgery team shows that the deformations and modifications of the geometry of these stents induced by the respiratory cycle could have a negative impact by migration, stenosis and thrombosis.
The NEOS-APAC post-market clinical follow-up study is undertaken to demonstrate the safety and clinical performance of E-vita OPEN NEO in the treatment of aneurysm or dissection in the ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta.
Aortic arch repair surgery is a technically complex and challenging procedure to treat aortic pathologies. Despite advancements in perioperative care, detrimental neurological complications occur during or after surgery. The neurological complications increase the economic burden of healthcare, morbidity and quality of life for the patients, even if they survive. Stroke, for example, leads to an increase in healthcare and social care costs, requiring a subsequent lengthy rehabilitation. Milder neurological impairments include transient ischaemic attacks, confusion and delirium, necessitating longer intensive care and hospital stay. Currently applied cerebral monitoring modalities are electroencephalogram and cerebral oximetry. However, they are not specific enough to timely detect early cerebral ischaemia to prevent neurological complications. S100B protein and neuron-specific enolase are serum markers that reflect cerebral damage, however, their applicability in the hyperacute setting is limited. However, rapid measurements of glial fibrillary protein have paved new pathways to detect cerebral injury. Recent studies reveal more sensitive biomarkers of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate and glycerol. These biomarkers could potentially detect cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis using the microdialysis method. The aim of the project is to develop a bedside system for early detection of cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis during aortic arch surgery. Early detection of cerebral ischaemia could mandate more aggressive cerebral protection strategies by further optimisation of hypothermia and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during surgery, and optimisation of blood pressure and oxygenation in the intensive care unit. Ultimately, early detection of cerebral ischemia during surgery will prevent disabling and costly neurological complications following surgery.
This is a pilot study to be performed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and the University of Massachusetts to determine the feasibility and develop the processes for a future randomized controlled trial to evaluate the occurrence of spinal cord ischemia after endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drains versus no pre-emptive drain. The research question to be addressed is as follows: In the setting of a comprehensive spinal cord ischemia prevention protocol, do prophylactic CSF drains decrease the rate of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in patients undergoing endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair?
The study of demographics and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms, allows to individualize treatment approaches. Determining of the results of treatment of patients who requires a late open conversion after EVAR will allow to develop the surgical approach and the selection of the optimal type of surgical treatment. Determination of genetic polymorphisms will reduce the number of postoperative complications by predicting of possible complications in the long term period.